On 15/03/14 07:16, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 15/03/14 07:12, Alan Chandler wrote:
...
According the explanation of all the parameters for main.cf
virtual_mailbox_domains defaults to $virtual_mail_box maps. so I am
thinking that I can drop that line in main.cf and move many of the
elements in vi
On 2014-03-18 Alan Chandler wrote:
> On 15/03/14 07:16, Alan Chandler wrote:
>> On 15/03/14 07:12, Alan Chandler wrote:
>>> ...
>>> According the explanation of all the parameters for main.cf
>>> virtual_mailbox_domains defaults to $virtual_mail_box maps. so I
>>> am thinking that I can drop that l
On 18/03/14 10:01, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2014-03-18 Alan Chandler wrote:
On 15/03/14 07:16, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 15/03/14 07:12, Alan Chandler wrote:
...
According the explanation of all the parameters for main.cf
virtual_mailbox_domains defaults to $virtual_mail_box maps. so I
am think
Thanks for the suggestion. The client in question is not too tech savvy
so explaining the POP thing will probably not help. I have used that
method before on a previous mail server with a different client and it
worked perfectly.
At the moment, all the spam is being directed to me by way of a
On 3/18/2014 5:14 AM, Alan Chandler wrote:
> But in this case, I think it is the only way for me to illustrate my
> frustration with this problem. Why is there no lookup of
> virtual_mailbox_maps to notice that the recipient is to be routed to
> a virtual mailbox.
Postfix behaves as documented.
Hi Sahil,
Sorry for my delayed response. I work in DEVOPS and we have had a crazy
release schedule!
I ran "postfix set-permissions" as root and did not see anything following -
just sent me to the next line.
I was working with another group within our company that uses Postfix just
for relay pur
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 07:27:01AM -0700, jmct wrote:
> Hi Sahil,
>
> Sorry for my delayed response. I work in DEVOPS and we have had a crazy
> release schedule!
>
> I ran "postfix set-permissions" as root and did not see anything following -
> just sent me to the next line.
>
> I was working wi
jmct:
> I was working with another group within our company that uses Postfix just
> for relay purposes and they noticed that in my /etc/postfix/master.cf - the
> pickup process in the "never" column was set to a default of "60". I changed
> this value to "1" and noticed that my e-mails are now sen
I've done away with the traditional alias files & virtually aliased
everything:
$ postconf -n alias_maps \
alias_database \
virtual_alias_domains \
virtual_alias_maps
alias_maps = $alias_database
alias_database =
virtual_alias_domains = btree:$config_directory/virtual_alias
Am 18.03.2014 16:09, schrieb Ben Johnson:
> A daily rkhunter scan produced the following warning, which mentions Postfix.
> Is this a false-positive?
>
> Warning: Network TCP port 47107 is being used by /usr/lib/postfix/proxymap.
> Possible rootkit: T0rn
> Use the 'lsof -i' or 'netsta
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:09:44AM -0400, Ben Johnson wrote:
> A daily rkhunter scan produced the following warning, which
> mentions Postfix. Is this a false-positive?
What is the anonymous port range on this system? Does proxymap
perform LDAP, MySQL or other lookups making client TCP connectio
Hello,
A daily rkhunter scan produced the following warning, which mentions Postfix.
Is this a false-positive?
Warning: Network TCP port 47107 is being used by /usr/lib/postfix/proxymap.
Possible rootkit: T0rn
Use the 'lsof -i' or 'netstat -an' command to check this.
The suggested com
On 18/03/14 14:12, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/18/2014 5:14 AM, Alan Chandler wrote:
But in this case, I think it is the only way for me to illustrate my
frustration with this problem. Why is there no lookup of
virtual_mailbox_maps to notice that the recipient is to be routed to
a virtual mailbox.
On 3/18/2014 10:20 AM, Alan Chandler wrote:
> What I am becoming to realise - but which I can't find documented
> anywhere is that there is a subtle difference between a map of
> domains (as keys) and a map of e-mail addresses (as keys), and
> although the documentation tells you that virtual_mail
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 03:20:16PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> What I am becoming to realise - but which I can't find documented anywhere
> is that there is a subtle difference between a map of domains (as keys) and
> a map of e-mail addresses (as keys), and although the documentation tells
> yo
Hi Wietse,
Apologies - I have VERY little Linux experience - all learned using Google
trying to get this mail server spun up. I've figured out the hard way that a
lot of my problems on getting this thing set up were permission related in
some form..
I have ran the command you requested. Here is t
On 18/03/14 15:26, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/18/2014 10:20 AM, Alan Chandler wrote:
What I am becoming to realise - but which I can't find documented
anywhere is that there is a subtle difference between a map of
domains (as keys) and a map of e-mail addresses (as keys), and
although the documenta
jmct:
> Hi Wietse,
>
> Apologies - I have VERY little Linux experience - all learned using Google
> trying to get this mail server spun up. I've figured out the hard way that a
> lot of my problems on getting this thing set up were permission related in
> some form..
>
> I have ran the command yo
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 08:29:43AM -0700, jmct wrote:
> I have ran the command you requested. Here is the output:
>
> [root new]# ls -ld / /var /var/spool /var/spool/postfix
> dr-xr-xr-x. 25 root root 4096 Mar 10 20:38 /
> drwxr-xr-x. 20 root root 4096 Jan 20 08:37 /var
> drwxr-xr-x. 13 root root
On 3/18/2014 11:14 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:09:44AM -0400, Ben Johnson wrote:
>
>> A daily rkhunter scan produced the following warning, which
>> mentions Postfix. Is this a false-positive?
>
> What is the anonymous port range on this system? Does proxymap
> perf
On 18/03/14 15:29, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 03:20:16PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
What I am becoming to realise - but which I can't find documented anywhere
is that there is a subtle difference between a map of domains (as keys) and
a map of e-mail addresses (as keys), an
Am 18.03.2014 16:38, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Now, look for SELINUX warnings.
>
> Or see if the warning goes away with:
>
> /etc/selinux/config: SELINUX=disabled
>
> and
>
> $service selinux restart
selinux is not a service
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/enable-permissive-mode-for-selinux-trou
I just figured this out myself when the command failed.
My $setgid_group is set to "postdrop" and $queue_directory set to
"/var/spool/postfix".
I have ran "ls -ld" for those directories you specified --
[root~]# ls -ld /var/spool/postfix/maildrop/
drwx-wx---. 2 postfix postdrop 4096 Mar 18 10:57
Am 18.03.2014 17:13, schrieb jmct:
I spoke with one of our Linux administrators and he advised that SELinux
didn't even cross his mind because he's so used to disabling it on install.
:P
Just curious: normally postfix runs quite well with selinux enabled.
Have you checked the audit logs where
Am 18.03.2014 22:21, schrieb Sergei:
> Is there a way to announce and allow unencrypted smtp authentication (AUTH
> LOGIN) only from 127.0.0.1?
>
> I want Roundcube (webmailer) to use the users credentials when sending mail
> for them and for performance reasons this should not require TLS. Bu
Is there a way to announce and allow unencrypted smtp authentication (AUTH
LOGIN) only from 127.0.0.1?
I want Roundcube (webmailer) to use the users credentials when sending mail
for them and for performance reasons this should not require TLS. But when
remote clients connect they should not be
My maillog entries like like this:
Mar 18 03:45:40 jgs postfix/pickup[20868]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 8C94B4F6B:
uid=0 from=
What is the "[ID 197553 mail.info]" part?
Can I turn it off?
Thanks.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 06:25:40PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>
> My maillog entries like like this:
>
> Mar 18 03:45:40 jgs postfix/pickup[20868]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 8C94B4F6B:
> uid=0 from=
>
> What is the "[ID 197553 mail.info]" part?
Your syslogd(8) inserts this data, Postfix does not g
Jay G. Scott:
>
> My maillog entries like like this:
>
> Mar 18 03:45:40 jgs postfix/pickup[20868]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 8C94B4F6B:
> uid=0 from=
>
> What is the "[ID 197553 mail.info]" part?
That text comes from your syslog daemon, not Postfix.
> Can I turn it off?
That is not a Postfix qu
Greetings,
I'm having troubles setting up the postfix after queue content filter.
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
In a nutshell, the filter works correctly, however the sendmail
command re-inserts the mail into the queue, and it hits the content
filter again.
(which in turn re-inserts i
I've recently inherited an old posfix server and I'm having a fair bit of
trouble with phising and compromised user accounts. I'm looking to rebuild the
whole system in the near future but migrating thousands of mailboxes is a task
that can't be done overnight.
I've hacked together a couple scri
31 matches
Mail list logo
