Please check the parameter soft_bounce in main.cf.
If it is set to yes then it will disable the locally generated bounce
messages
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Erik Grøtnes wrote:
> Hi.
>
> In my postfix queue I can see messages with return code 5xx which are
> still in queue for delivery.
Hello,
I've got 3 machines running postfix 2.11-20131001. Incoming connections are
balanced via haproxy (and postscreen_upstream_proxy_protocol=haproxy). Right
now each postfix instance has its own postscreen_cache_map. Everything works
fine.
I thought I could share the cache among all nodes usin
Am 2013-11-21 17:39, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 04:42:10PM +0100, Michael Storz wrote:
I am trying to configure a fixed destination for a smtp transport in
master.cf instead of confguring the destination in a transport_map.
There's your mistake. Set the nexthop for the
Kris Deugau wrote:
>jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Can someone explain this error to me, I have never seen this one
>before. I tested my spf records and they seem fine.
>>
: host mail.ncem-pa.org[204.186.202.37] said:
>554
5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Failed
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 06:00:04PM +0100, Michael Storz wrote:
> >There's your mistake. Set the nexthop for the transport in the
> >transport table. There is no master.cf (i.e. smtp(8) command-line)
> >option to set the nexthop destination.
>
> Well, it is not a mistake, it was the question, if
Hi,
I'm wanting to get some unix socket support on my mail server for the same
protocol used by the TCP table. I can see patches for this were submitted
before but had some issues with usability and namespace:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/222895
Has any thought been put int
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:13 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 20.11.2013 13:55, schrieb bitozoid:
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Brian Evans wrote:
>>> The smtp client process does not have support for the deprecated smtps
>>> protocol (465) you are trying to use.
>>
>> I have another instan
> Why not use socketmaps? These already support "inet" and "unix"
> domain sockets, and they use (length, value) netstrings which require
> no encoding of special characters. There are netstring implementations
> for many languages, so availability should not be a problem.
Thanks. I'll definitely
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:07:44AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=devisubox.com; s=mail;
> > t=1385028965; bh=75o/sAM/Vtv41UrIwg0b4q1zZtrst1XwSPtjrKyZij0=;
> > h=To:Subject:From:Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
> >
Greetings,
Can someone explain this error to me, I have never seen this one before. I
tested my spf records and they seem fine.
>> : host mail.ncem-pa.org[204.186.202.37] said: 554
>>5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Failed SPF
>>check; beth.k12.pa.us, Redundant applicable 'v=spf1' se
Thanks! Very cool!
Pol
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:33:30PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> --8<-snip-here--8<--
>> #!/bin/sh
>>
>> case $# in
>> 0) echo usage: $0 example.com ... 1>&2; exit 1;;
>> esac
>>
>> VIRTUAL_MAP=/etc/postfix/virtual
>> VIRTUAL_DOMAINS=/etc/postfix/virtual_domains
>>
>>
Jean-Christophe Begue:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running postfix 2.7.0 and OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.2 on Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS.
The critical component that you fail to mention is the program that
generates the email. And that program is the most likely source of
the problem.
> I suspect that i'm missing somethi
jeffrey j donovan:
> Greetings,
>
> Can someone explain this error to me, I have never seen this one before. I
> tested my spf records and they seem fine.
>
> >> : host mail.ncem-pa.org[204.186.202.37] said: 554
> >>5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Failed SPF
> >>check; beth.k12.pa.u
Hello,
I'm running postfix 2.7.0 and OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.2 on Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS.
I managed to get DKIM signature working, but I still have a problem with
multipart Content-Type. When it is so, I get dkim=neutral (bad format)
header.i=@devisubox.com as authentication result.
I suspect that i'm
Why do you even have this record? "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all"
Did you get it from here? https://support.google.com/a/answer/178723
You already have what you need for Google site verification, so unless
you have a good specific reason for it, you should drop that line
altogether.
Also,
Am 21.11.2013 18:40, schrieb jeffrey j donovan:
> Greetings,
>
> Can someone explain this error to me, I have never seen this one before. I
> tested my spf records and they seem fine.
>
>>> : host mail.ncem-pa.org[204.186.202.37] said: 554
>>>5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Failed SPF
hodor:
> Hello,
>
> I've got 3 machines running postfix 2.11-20131001. Incoming connections are
> balanced via haproxy (and postscreen_upstream_proxy_protocol=haproxy). Right
> now each postfix instance has its own postscreen_cache_map. Everything works
> fine.
>
> I thought I could share the cac
On 2013.11.21 17:45:29 +0100, Michael Storz wrote:
> Am 2013-11-21 17:26, schrieb Manuel Bieling:
> >On 2013.11.21 16:42:10 +0100, Michael Storz wrote:
> >You specify command line options for the smtp daemon via '-o'.
> >All options are well documented in
> >
> >http://www.postfix.org/smtp.8.ht
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 04:42:10PM +0100, Michael Storz wrote:
> I am trying to configure a fixed destination for a smtp transport in
> master.cf instead of confguring the destination in a transport_map.
There's your mistake. Set the nexthop for the transport in the
transport table. There is no
On 2013.11.21 16:42:10 +0100, Michael Storz wrote:
> I am trying to configure a fixed destination for a smtp transport in
> master.cf instead of confguring the destination in a transport_map.
> Since smtp has no special command-line option for this I suppose I
> have to specify a generic Postfix da
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:45:29PM +0100, Michael Storz wrote:
> Correct, default_transport cannot be used because to is too late.
> What I need is a smtp option which would be evaluated when the email
> arrives at the smtp transport and which would overwrite the
> destination already calculated b
Jason Woods:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wanting to get some unix socket support on my mail server for
> the same protocol used by the TCP table. I can see patches for
> this were submitted before but had some issues with usability and
> namespace:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/222895
>
>
jeffrey j donovan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Can someone explain this error to me, I have never seen this one before. I
> tested my spf records and they seem fine.
>
>>> : host mail.ncem-pa.org[204.186.202.37] said: 554
>>>5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Failed SPF
>>>check; beth.k12.p
Wieste : apparently, the php script uses htmlMimeMail5.php, that you can
find here:
http://code.google.com/p/punchcms/source/browse/trunk/manager/libraries/htmlMimeMail5/htmlMimeMail5.php?r=87.
I think it could be as buggy as you described, i'll try to dump the Raw
message.
Viktor : thank you for
Hello,
I am trying to find a way to use an LDAP filter in Postfix to bypass my amavis
(maia mailguard) content filter. Currently I do use hash or cidr files in my
smtpd recipient restrictions list to bypass the filter for certain senders
and/or recipient that has lines like this in it:
FILTER
Am 2013-11-21 17:26, schrieb Manuel Bieling:
On 2013.11.21 16:42:10 +0100, Michael Storz wrote:
I am trying to configure a fixed destination for a smtp transport in
master.cf instead of confguring the destination in a transport_map.
Since smtp has no special command-line option for this I suppos
Jean-Christophe Begue:
> Wieste : apparently, the php script uses htmlMimeMail5.php, that you can
> find here:
> http://code.google.com/p/punchcms/source/browse/trunk/manager/libraries/htmlMimeMail5/htmlMimeMail5.php?r=87.
> I think it could be as buggy as you described, i'll try to dump the Raw
>
I am trying to configure a fixed destination for a smtp transport in
master.cf instead of confguring the destination in a transport_map.
Since smtp has no special command-line option for this I suppose I have
to specify a generic Postfix daemon option via -o. However, since all
relevant command
28 matches
Mail list logo
