jeffrey j donovan wrote: > Greetings, > > Can someone explain this error to me, I have never seen this one before. I > tested my spf records and they seem fine. > >>> <someu...@ncem-pa.org>: host mail.ncem-pa.org[204.186.202.37] said: 554 >>> 5.7.1 <someu...@ncem-pa.org>: Recipient address rejected: Failed SPF >>> check; beth.k12.pa.us, Redundant applicable 'v=spf1' sender policies >>> found >>> (in reply to RCPT TO command) >>> Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp5.beth.k12.pa.us > > in this , it looks like the user recipient address is incorrect or something > along those lines. > I do have two spf records, one for my relays and one for google.
I'm not completely clear on what you mean by "one for my relays and one for google", but you have two SPF records published publicly. Don't Do That. (I don't think it's strictly a violation of the spec, but clearly the recipient is being picky.) There's no reason not to combine them like so: beth.k12.pa.us IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:209.96.107.0/24 ip4:209.96.96.0/24 mx:beth.k12.pa.us mx:bethsd.org include:_spf.google.com ~all" unless you really need different SPF records to be visible to different systems, which means you'll need to investigate DNS views so that any given client only sees one SPF record. -kgd
