Hi All,
I have configured content filter to block spam at mta level, to reject mails
header subject, recently our client sent a mail with subject "pharmacy school"
mail is rejected triggering keyword pharmacy.
I would like to know how to white list domains bypassing content filter.
Thanks
On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:08, Ramesh wrote:
> I have configured content filter to block spam at mta level, to reject mails
> header subject, recently our client sent a mail with subject "pharmacy
> school" mail is rejected triggering keyword pharmacy.
>
> I would like to know how to white list d
I've not configured third party software, content filter configured using
header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks
this rejects mails if any keyword defined in header_checks triggers.
Thanks,
Ramesh
From: DTNX Postmaster
To: "postfix-users@postfi
Stan Hoeppner:
> Wietse, I recall being part of a discussion quite some time ago, and I
> thought this had been worked out already, using proxymap. My
> recollection is really vague.
Your recollection is incorrect.
> What am I remembering, if not postscreen
> cache sharing between hosts?
This t
Viktor, I'll report your answer internally and so we'll decide next step.
Timo, also your suggestion is right; the problem is that we must teach to our
Customers the guide line to use, and it's not an easy task. But we can do
something with it.
I'll back on this thread as soon I have news
Than
On Apr 16, 2013, at 12:47, Ramesh wrote:
> I've not configured third party software, content filter configured using
> header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks
>
> this rejects mails if any keyword defined in header_checks triggers.
Please do not top-post.
Read and understand the fo
On 2013-04-16 18:47:44 +0800, Ramesh wrote:
> I've not configured third party software, content filter configured
> using header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks
>
> this rejects mails if any keyword defined in header_checks triggers.
[...]
> > I would like to know how to white list doma
Ramesh:
>
>I've not configured third party software, content filter configured
>using header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks
>
>this rejects mails if any keyword defined? in header_checks triggers.
As documented header/body_checks stop an explosion of worms/viruses
or backscatter email.
On 4/14/2013 1:23 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> This sends mail from me to me, but smtp_generic_maps replaces all
>> the addresses with postmaster.
>>
>> Commands:
>> % postconf smtp_generic_maps
>> smtp_generic_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/generic
>> % postmap -q wie...@porcupine.org hash:/etc/postfix/g
On 4/16/2013 1:12 AM, kandy kandy wrote:
> Can I receive an email every time I have a rejection ?
Postfix can't do this by itself, but you can configure an external
process to send a notice based on log events.
fail2ban could be pretty easily convinced to do this.
But I fail to see any benefit
On 4/16/2013 7:14 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2013-04-16 18:47:44 +0800, Ramesh wrote:
>> I've not configured third party software, content filter configured
>> using header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks
>>
>> this rejects mails if any keyword defined in header_checks triggers.
si
Noel Jones:
> On 4/16/2013 1:12 AM, kandy kandy wrote:
> > Can I receive an email every time I have a rejection ?
>
> Postfix can't do this by itself, but you can configure an external
> process to send a notice based on log events.
It can with notify_classes, but you really don't want to get one
hello
I use sender_canonical_maps to rewrite sender addresses
since years.
Due to end of support of vexira anti-virus for mail server
I moved to the amavis-new + clamav + spamassassin
installed from FreeBSD ports.
Everything works well except the sender_canonical_maps
which does not seems to be
Frank Bonnet:
> hello
>
> I use sender_canonical_maps to rewrite sender addresses
> since years.
>
> Due to end of support of vexira anti-virus for mail server
> I moved to the amavis-new + clamav + spamassassin
> installed from FreeBSD ports.
>
> Everything works well except the sender_canonica
On 4/16/2013 6:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> Wietse, I recall being part of a discussion quite some time ago, and I
>> thought this had been worked out already, using proxymap. My
>> recollection is really vague.
>
> Your recollection is incorrect.
>
>> What am I remembering, i
15 matches
Mail list logo