On 4/16/2013 6:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Stan Hoeppner: >> Wietse, I recall being part of a discussion quite some time ago, and I >> thought this had been worked out already, using proxymap. My >> recollection is really vague. > > Your recollection is incorrect. > >> What am I remembering, if not postscreen >> cache sharing between hosts? > > This text: > > --begin quote-- > backup (default: undefined) > An optional Postfix database that provides persistent backup... > > # Non-shared postscreen cache. > backup = btree:/var/lib/postfix/postscreen_cache_map > > # Shared postscreen cache for processes on the same host. > backup = proxy:btree:/var/lib/postfix/postscreen_cache_map > > Access to remote proxymap servers is under development. > --end quote-- > > Wietse
I'm not recalling the docs. What I'm vaguely recalling is the conversation where we discussed methods of implementing the multihost sharing. IIRC someone mentioned possibly adapting TCP tables for use here. This was probably part of the same conversation that resulted in the above feature. In any event, whatever we discussed hasn't yet been implemented. I simply had recollection of discussing the multihost feature, but not the resulting status, which was obviously "future development". Sorry for wasting time. -- Stan
