Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-28 Thread Marko Weber | ZBF
"The table was created many years ago over an extended period of time,...::" so, its outdated? i think its better to use postscreen and a regular updated file like DROP from spamhaus. i refresh this DROP every hour. so maybe wrong listed candidates are deleted in the refreshe

Re: compile and path

2013-03-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh: > // > ehlo localhost > 250-plato.example.com > 250-PIPELINING > 250-SIZE 3072 > 250-VRFY > 250-ETRN > 250-STARTTLS > 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN > 250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN > 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES > 250-8BITMIME > 250 DSN > /// >

Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-28 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:15:02AM +0100, Marko Weber | ZBF wrote: > "The table was created many years ago over an extended period of > time,...::" That was what Stan said, yes. > so, its outdated? Let's scroll down through the mass of quoting over which you top-posted and see w

Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-28 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 3/28/2013 12:12 AM, Noel Jones wrote: > Yes, first match wins. This needs to be *immediately* followed by what you stated way down below, copied here: > - each smtpd_*_restrictions section must resolve to "permit" (or > empty) to accept mail. A "permit" in one smtpd_*_restrictions > section

Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-28 Thread Matthew Hall
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > I don't have the thread archived (it's been 8 years or so), so I'm > guessing here, but IIRC it took at least a half dozen or more emails > back-forth before I understood this lack or inheritance. Once I did, > and realized how much I'd have

Re: Distributed Postfix

2013-03-28 Thread Bill Cole
On 27 Mar 2013, at 8:32, Gaby L wrote: Thanks I have refered to split only postfix functions,but for it ,is need create coherent users system. For example if I create one user in gmail system,this user physical is stored only one central machine then is accesed through diverse distribute mec

Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-28 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 3/28/2013 8:03 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > "... maintaining it ..." see? I would think that something which is > maintained generally isn't outdated. Depends how well the maintainer > maintains it, of course. Precisely. Let me add that ISPs introduce new consumer rDNS strings very infrequently.