Re: My unqualified host name (servername) unknown; sleeping for retry

2011-11-10 Thread Ian
> i do you stop the daemon sendmail with the standard script systeme and start > postfix daemon > or use the toolkit to your system configuration if you use centos or redhat: stop sendmail: service sendmail stop remove sendmail from system rpm -e sendmail start postfix service postfix start in

Re: My unqualified host name (servername) unknown; sleeping for retry

2011-11-10 Thread fakessh @
Le jeudi 10 novembre 2011 09:30, Ian a écrit : > > i do you stop the daemon sendmail with the standard script systeme and > > start postfix daemon > > or use the toolkit to your system configuration > > if you use centos or redhat: > > stop sendmail: > service sendmail stop > > remove sendmail from

Re: bounce problem

2011-11-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Gabriele Gabriele : > > Dear Mailinlist, may be I'm not the fist who have thin problem, but I can't > found a solution > > I need to send all the bounce messages, that my mail server bounce to the > spammers, for example to /dev/null Solution: Don't generate bounces. Why are you generating b

RE: bounce problem

2011-11-10 Thread Gabriele Gabriele
for example: if some one send one e-mail from internet to one user that non existi on my domain > Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:52:13 +0100 > From: ralf.hildebra...@charite.de > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: bounce problem > > * Gabriele Gabriele : > > > > Dear Mailinlist, may be I

Re: bounce problem

2011-11-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Gabriele Gabriele : > > for example: > if some one send one e-mail from internet to one user that non existi on my > domain In that case your server is simply misconfigured :) Please show "postconf -n" output and I can tell you where the problem might lie. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbe

bad From: field

2011-11-10 Thread privat
After moving to a new host running Ubuntu 10.10 I get in outgoing mails sent from account "privat" a From:-field From: privat it used to be before From: ulrich.laut...@t-online.de In sender_canonical I have privat@localhostulrich.laut...@t-online.de and in generic pri

postfix multple instances

2011-11-10 Thread Amira Othman
Hi all I have configured two instances of postfix 2.8 and it's working fine but I want to separate logs of each instance to be different than the other instance . How can I do that? Regards

Re: bad From: field

2011-11-10 Thread Simon Brereton
On 10 November 2011 07:21, privat wrote: > After moving to a new host running Ubuntu 10.10 I get in outgoing mails > sent from account "privat" a From:-field > >        From: privat > > it used  to be before > >        From: ulrich.laut...@t-online.de > > In sender_canonical I have > privat@local

Re: bounce problem

2011-11-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 10.11.2011 12:56, schrieb Gabriele Gabriele: > for example: > if some one send one e-mail from internet to one user that non exist on my > domain you have to reject mail for non-existent users and the sending server is repsonsible for bounces in this case, what you are doing is backscatterin

RE: bounce problem

2011-11-10 Thread Gabriele Gabriele
postconf -n alias_database = hash:/postfix/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/postfix/etc/aliases command_directory = /postfix/sbin config_directory = /postfix/etc daemon_directory =/postfix/libexec debug_peer_level = 2 html_directory = no local_recipient_maps = luser_relay = /dev/null mail_owner = po

Re: bounce problem

2011-11-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Gabriele Gabriele : > alias_maps = hash:/postfix/etc/aliases > local_recipient_maps = These must not be empty! Use the default (delete this line9 > luser_relay = /dev/null remove this. There is no user "/dev/null" > relay_domains = > $mydomain,aririeti.it,justprime.com,sabina.it,pippoborrell

RE: bounce problem

2011-11-10 Thread Gabriele Gabriele
thanks a lot but this not revolve my problem.. to send the bouce mail into /dev/null > Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:18:12 +0100 > From: ralf.hildebra...@charite.de > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: bounce problem > > * Gabriele Gabriele : > > > alias_maps = hash:/postfix/etc/aliases

Re: bounce problem

2011-11-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Gabriele Gabriele : > > thanks a lot > but this not revolve my problem.. to send the bouce mail into /dev/null Yes it does. With my recommendation your server won't send any bounces for unknown recipients, since it REJECTs those right away. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilu

Re: postfix multple instances

2011-11-10 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 11/10/2011 7:26 AM, Amira Othman wrote: Hi all I have configured two instances of postfix 2.8 and it’s working fine but I want to separate logs of each instance to be different than the other instance . How can I do that? Regards http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#syslog_name Rea

Re: bad From: field

2011-11-10 Thread Wietse Venema
privat: > After moving to a new host running Ubuntu 10.10 I get in outgoing mails > sent from account "privat" a From:-field > > From: privat > > it used to be before > > From: ulrich.laut...@t-online.de That information is provided by the mail submission client. Postfix does

Re: postfix multple instances

2011-11-10 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thursday 10 November 2011 07:48:19 Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > On 11/10/2011 7:26 AM, Amira Othman wrote: > > I have configured two instances of postfix 2.8 and it’s working > > fine but I want to separate logs of each instance to be > > different than the other instance . > > > > How

smtpd_restriction_classes

2011-11-10 Thread Blake Hudson
I've read the manual on smtpd_restriction_classes (http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html) and have one question that remains unanswered. Per the example, if I had the following configured: --- /etc/postfix/main.cf: s

Re: smtpd_restriction_classes

2011-11-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Blake Hudson: > I've read the manual on smtpd_restriction_classes > (http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html) and have one > question that remains unanswered. > > Per the example, if I had the following configured: > --- >

Re: bad From: field

2011-11-10 Thread privat
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:58:54AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > privat: > > After moving to a new host running Ubuntu 10.10 I get in outgoing mails > > sent from account "privat" a From:-field > > > > From: privat > > > > it used to be before > > > > From: ulrich.laut...@t-onl

Re: bad From: field

2011-11-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* privat : > BTW, for composing and sending mail, I use mutt. in muttrc: my_hdr From: Ralf Hildebrandt -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155

Re: 450 4.7.1 error using Postfix/MIMEDefang/milter-manager

2011-11-10 Thread Larry
Nov 10 16:36:35 mailproc milter-manager[28798]: [statistics] [session][end][unknown][abort][79.3845](7) Nov 10 16:36:35 mailproc milter-manager[28798]: [statistics] [sessions][finished] 4(+1) 0 Nov 10 16:36:38 mailproc postfix/postfix-script[31022]: refreshing the Postfix mail system Nov 10 16:3

Re: 450 4.7.1 error using Postfix/MIMEDefang/milter-manager

2011-11-10 Thread Larry
stinking chroots! :) --- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Larry G. Wapnitsky: > > 220 mailproc.domain.com ESMTP Postfix (Debian/GNU) > > helo test > > 250 mailproc.domain.com > > mail from: root > > 451 4.7.1 Service unavailable - try again later > > This mail server err

Re: bad From: field

2011-11-10 Thread Ulrich Lauther
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:21:17PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * privat : > > > BTW, for composing and sending mail, I use mutt. > > in muttrc: > my_hdr From: Ralf Hildebrandt > Thanks a lot, that did it. -ulrich

Re: bad From: field

2011-11-10 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 2011-11-10 13:21, privat wrote: After moving to a new host running Ubuntu 10.10 I get in outgoing mails sent from account "privat" a From:-field From: privat it used to be before From: ulrich.laut...@t-online.de These are headers; postfix does not "fix" them unless you

reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-10 Thread Steve Fatula
This check says that the RFC requires a fully qualified hostname for HELO. Most internet searches show this to be a "safe" check that shouldn't really kill any real mail. Lately, noticed no ebay mail was coming through, looked through the logs and see entires like: Nov  9 20:30:58 host2 postfix

Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-10 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 2011-11-11 00:45, Steve Fatula wrote: This check says that the RFC requires a fully qualified hostname for HELO. Most internet searches show this to be a "safe" check that shouldn't really kill any real mail. Lately, noticed no ebay mail was coming through, looked through the logs and see en

Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-10 Thread Steve Fatula
From: Jeroen Geilman >To: postfix-users@postfix.org >Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 6:13 PM >Subject: Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety > > >I have seen it too, on bulk mailer software (as ebay's probably is), but my >logs from the past 6 weeks do not contain a single reject

Configure Postfix for Request Tracker and localhost smtp relay

2011-11-10 Thread Gregory Machin
Hi. I have a server that's running Postfix, it's configured to deliver email generated by applications on the same server to an Exchange server which then sends them to their final destination. I have installed Request Tracker on the server. One of the requirements for RT is that it needs to recei

Re: Configure Postfix for Request Tracker and localhost smtp relay

2011-11-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:59:48 +1300, Gregory Machin wrote: /etc/postfix/aliases postmaster:root clamav: root www-data: root rt r...@endace.com rt-comment rt-comm...@endace.com rt and rt-comment missing : after this is edited, run newaliases, and show logs if still not working

Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-10 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thursday 10 November 2011 17:45:18 Steve Fatula wrote: > This check says that the RFC requires a fully qualified hostname > for HELO. Most internet searches show this to be a "safe" check > that shouldn't really kill any real mail. Lately, noticed no ebay > mail was coming through, looked throug

Re: bad From: field

2011-11-10 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thursday 10 November 2011 15:21:17 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * privat : > > BTW, for composing and sending mail, I use mutt. > > in muttrc: > my_hdr From: Ralf Hildebrandt I tried this, but now my mail says I am you! Please help!! ;) -- Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless

Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-10 Thread Simon Brereton
On 10 November 2011 18:45, Steve Fatula wrote: > This check says that the RFC requires a fully qualified hostname for HELO. > Most internet searches show this to be a "safe" check that shouldn't really > kill any real mail. Lately, noticed no ebay mail was coming through, looked > through the logs

Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-10 Thread Steve Fatula
From: Simon Brereton >To: postfix users >Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 9:26 PM >Subject: Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety > > > >Write them a note with the RFC I say.  Standards are no good if you >let yours slip because it's Ebay.  or Google.  or InsetBrandnamehere. > > >

Problem In Zimbra Postfix

2011-11-10 Thread Uma Shankar
Hi Guys, Do you have any idea about how does the zimbra domain alias works. As currently I have done the following setup but I am getting an error "Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table;" real domain: domain.com alias domain: aliasdomain.com user: t...@domain.com creati

postfix not running and not startable

2011-11-10 Thread Dave Stevens
I have a vps running ubuntu 10.04LTS on an openVZ platform. On top of that I installed Virtualmin GPL to help host web sites and simplify mail setup. I don't have much need for mail at the moment but I expect to in the next few months. Recently I ssh'd into the machine and did this: logwat