Hello,
I'm having problems with mail accumulating in the incoming queue under
heavy load (2500+ SMTPd processes). The queue manager stops for a long
time once in a while after trying to communicate with the "trace" client,
as shown in a trace from cleanup below:
--
open("public/qmgr", O_WRONLY|O_
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:27:25AM -0300, Eduardo M. Stelmaszczyk wrote:
> I'm having problems with mail accumulating in the incoming queue under
> heavy load (2500+ SMTPd processes). The queue manager stops for a long
> time once in a while after trying to communicate with the "trace" client,
> a
2011/4/18 fakessh :
> I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time to
> watch list archives and found no answers
>
> example of a header that I want to appear in my mail
>
> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
> abuse report
> X-
Eduardo M . Stelmaszczyk:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having problems with mail accumulating in the incoming queue under
> heavy load (2500+ SMTPd processes). The queue manager stops for a long
> time once in a while after trying to communicate with the "trace" client,
> as shown in a trace from cleanup belo
Le lundi 18 avril 2011 13:10, Morten P.D. Stevens a écrit :
> 2011/4/18 fakessh :
> > I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time
> > to watch list archives and found no answers
> >
> > example of a header that I want to appear in my mail
> >
> > X-AntiAbuse: This header
On 4/18/2011 6:46 AM, fakessh wrote:
Le lundi 18 avril 2011 13:10, Morten P.D. Stevens a écrit :
2011/4/18 fakessh:
I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time
to watch list archives and found no answers
example of a header that I want to appear in my mail
X-AntiAb
Eduardo M . Stelmaszczyk:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having problems with mail accumulating in the incoming queue under
> heavy load (2500+ SMTPd processes). The queue manager stops for a long
> time once in a while after trying to communicate with the "trace" client,
> as shown in a trace from cleanup belo
My default account is getting hammered with spam. I've
got SA / Amavisd-new working and tagging the messages as ***spam***
however I've just re-configured SA to be a little more aggressive on
scoring the messages. My question to the Postfix group is if I can
configure a restriction in /etc/postfix
* Carlos Mennens :
> My default account is getting hammered with spam. I've
> got SA / Amavisd-new working and tagging the messages as ***spam***
> however I've just re-configured SA to be a little more aggressive on
> scoring the messages. My question to the Postfix group is if I can
> configure
Hello All,
I just wanted to confirm that if I create a recipient bcc map and have a
messages forwarding basically to another address, if that additional address
rejects the message it will go back to the sender?
If so whats the real difference if I am doing a 1 to 1 bcc between that and
addin
Jack:
> Hello All,
>
> I just wanted to confirm that if I create a recipient bcc map and have a
> messages forwarding basically to another address, if that additional address
> rejects the message it will go back to the sender?
This depends on your Postfix version. Postfix < 2.3 will send
a bounc
On 04/18/11 10:07, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> My default account is getting hammered with spam. I've
> got SA / Amavisd-new working and tagging the messages as ***spam***
> however I've just re-configured SA to be a little more aggressive on
> scoring the messages. My question to the Postfix group is
Hi,
I'm trying to configure postfix v2.7.3 on fedora with the best options
for utilizing RBLs, including zen, and was trying to implement
rbl_reply_maps (as per the STRESS_README of all places):
1 /etc/postfix/main.cf:
2 smtpd_client_restrictions =
3 permit_mynetworks
4 r
* Alex :
> Hi,
> I'm trying to configure postfix v2.7.3 on fedora with the best options
> for utilizing RBLs, including zen, and was trying to implement
> rbl_reply_maps (as per the STRESS_README of all places):
>
> 1 /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> 2 smtpd_client_restrictions =
> 3 permi
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:54:11 -0400
Alex wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to configure postfix v2.7.3 on fedora with the best
options
for utilizing RBLs, including zen, and was trying to implement
rbl_reply_maps (as per the STRESS_README of all places):
1 /etc/postfix/main.cf:
2 smtpd_client_restr
> 95.98.* REJECT
# cidr_reject file
95.98.0.0/16 REJECT
add reject_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/cidr_reject to
smtpd_*_restriction
On 04/18/2011 04:07 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
My default account is getting hammered with spam. I've
got SA / Amavisd-new working and tagging the messages as ***spam***
however I've just re-configured SA to be a little more aggressive on
scoring the messages. My question to the Postfix group is
We are testing a new mail server set-up. During this test period we want
for some users deliver their mail as usual but we also want to send the
mail to a second postfix mail server: the test environment.
Our current working setup: mail filtering with greylist -> amavisd +
spamassassin + dspa
Ruud Baart put forth on 4/18/2011 5:22 PM:
> We are testing a new mail server set-up. During this test period we want
> for some users deliver their mail as usual but we also want to send the
> mail to a second postfix mail server: the test environment.
>
> Our current working setup: mail filterin
Le lundi 18 avril 2011 14:16, Noel Jones a écrit :
> On 4/18/2011 6:46 AM, fakessh wrote:
> > Le lundi 18 avril 2011 13:10, Morten P.D. Stevens a écrit :
> >> 2011/4/18 fakessh:
> >>> I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time
> >>> to watch list archives and found no a
fakessh wrote:
>hello postfix guru
>hello wieste
>hello mouss
>
>
>
>
>I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time to
>watch list archives and found no answers
>
>example of a header that I want to appear in my mail
>
>X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abu
Le mardi 19 avril 2011 01:22, fakessh a écrit :
> Le lundi 18 avril 2011 14:16, Noel Jones a écrit :
> > On 4/18/2011 6:46 AM, fakessh wrote:
> > > Le lundi 18 avril 2011 13:10, Morten P.D. Stevens a écrit :
> > >> 2011/4/18 fakessh:
> > >>> I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a go
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 00:22:33 +0200, Ruud Baart wrote:
> We are testing a new mail server set-up. During this test period we
> want for some users deliver their mail as usual but we also want to
> send the mail to a second postfix mail server: the test environment.
[ .. ]
> It must be possible
Hi,
>> 10 /etc/postfix/rbl_reply_maps:
>> 11 # With Postfix 2.3-2.5 use "421" to hang up connections.
>> 12 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.10 521 4.7.1 Service unavailable;
>> 13 $rbl_class [$rbl_what] blocked using
>> 14 $rbl_domain${rbl_reason?; $rbl_reason}
>
> This needs to go
Hi,
I've just set up a fedora14 box with postfix v2.7.3, and would like to
use procmail as the delivery agent. In previous systems I've set up,
procmail was setuid root, but on this one it is not. Without it, it
seems it can't write the spool file:
Apr 18 21:39:58 mail02t postfix/local[12142]: 3B
Hi,
>> I've just set up a fedora14 box with postfix v2.7.3, and would like to
>> use procmail as the delivery agent. In previous systems I've set up,
>> procmail was setuid root, but on this one it is not. Without it, it
>> seems it can't write the spool file:
>>
>> Apr 18 21:39:58 mail02t postfix
26 matches
Mail list logo
