Hi,
I am using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS with postfix 2.7.0
I have suddenly discovered a lot of the following in some of my mailservers (
5) mail.logs:
Mar 19 02:27:37 mxgw2.sdu.dk postfix/smtpd[5173]: table
hash:/etc/postfix/myrelaydomains(0,lock|fold_fix) has changed – restarting
Mar 19 02:30:14
Am 25.03.2011 09:59, schrieb Peter Sørensen:
> I have a set of function which among others will create the myrelaydomains
> from
> a mysql DB table and then postmap hash: myrelaydomains
why in the world are you not using the mysql-table directly in postfix
> but this should’nt be called on
Am 25.03.2011 00:15, schrieb Murray S. Kucherawy:
MTA history goes back to sendmail, which had three main modes for injecting a
message:
1) sendmail user@host
[message header and body here]
["." or EOF]
2) sendmail -t
[message header and body here]
["." or EOF]
Both commands
I am fully aware that postfix supports mysql. The reason is actually a
performance issue
concerning the mysql backend so you might see this as a temporary workaround for
the mysql problems.
/Peter
Fra: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@p
Hello
We have an inhouse application that deliver emails
to validate students registrations.
For adminitrative purpose we nedd to keep a copy of
each sent email.
I activated the sender_bcc_maps feature to send a
copy to another administrative email address :
in the sender_bcc_maps map I have the
* Frank Bonnet :
> Hello
>
> We have an inhouse application that deliver emails
> to validate students registrations.
>
> For adminitrative purpose we nedd to keep a copy of
> each sent email.
>
> I activated the sender_bcc_maps feature to send a
> copy to another administrative email address :
On 03/25/2011 10:56 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Frank Bonnet :
>> Hello
>>
>> We have an inhouse application that deliver emails
>> to validate students registrations.
>>
>> For adminitrative purpose we nedd to keep a copy of
>> each sent email.
>>
>> I activated the sender_bcc_maps feature to
* Frank Bonnet :
> smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-122
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Frank Bonnet :
>
>> smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
>-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
>
Thank you Ralf .
>The "*" entry is not required, that's what "default_transport" is for. If
>you want non-default nexthops for the relay_domains, just use the default
>setting of "relay_transport = relay" without an explicit nexthop.
Hello!
Your original suggestion has now been tested, but there is some issue w
Peter S?rensen:
> Mar 19 02:27:37 mxgw2.sdu.dk postfix/smtpd[5173]: table
> hash:/etc/postfix/myrelaydomains(0,lock|fold_fix) has changed _ restarting
This is how Postfix works when you change a hash file. If this
bothers you. don't use unnecessary postmap commands.
Wietse
Peter S?rensen:
> I am fully aware that postfix supports mysql. The reason is actually a
> performance issue
> concerning the mysql backend so you might see this as a temporary workaround
> for
> the mysql problems.
Use proxymap.
Replace "mysql:/file/name" by "proxy:mysql:/file/name".
http://w
Dear
I would like to limit the recipients number in Bcc Header field
i have set
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
content:
/^To:([^@]*@){50,}/ REJECT Sorry, your message has too many recepients.
/^Cc:([^@]*@){50,}/ REJECT Sorry, your message has too many recepients.
/^
David Touzeau:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> Dear
>
> I would like to limit the recipients number in Bcc Header field
>
> i have set
>
> header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
>
> content:
>
> /^To:([^@]*@){50,}/ REJECT Sorry, your message has too many recepients
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 07:21 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> David Touzeau:
> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > Dear
> >
> > I would like to limit the recipients number in Bcc Header field
> >
> > i have set
> >
> > header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
> >
> >
Am 25.03.2011 12:19, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Peter S?rensen:
>> I am fully aware that postfix supports mysql. The reason is actually a
>> performance issue
>> concerning the mysql backend so you might see this as a temporary workaround
>> for
>> the mysql problems.
>
> Use proxymap.
>
> Repl
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, David Touzeau wrote:
What do you means when you said "BCC" is deleted ?
You means that BCC is not stored in the header when postfix try to catch it
BCC is BLIND Carbon Copy. It wouldn't be very blind if the BCC header was
allowed to stay in the message so to prevent that,
I've already used the proxymap solution. We ran into serious problems with the
clustered mysql backend.
I have 5 servers with smtd set to max 300.
I will get back to the proxymap solution. I have adjusted some settings in the
mysql backend.
But still - this annoys me. What is triggering postfi
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 07:06 -0500, Larry Stone a écrit :
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, David Touzeau wrote:
>
> > What do you means when you said "BCC" is deleted ?
> > You means that BCC is not stored in the header when postfix try to catch it
>
> BCC is BLIND Carbon Copy. It wouldn't be very blin
Jeroen van Aart put forth on 3/23/2011 5:06 PM:
> I am curious if postfix would be able to send out 30 emails in one
> hour, to different recipients of course.
How are you injecting the 30k emails into Postfix? Mailing list manager
or other means? Via SMTP or the local sendmail command?
--
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Frank Bonnet :
>
>> smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
>-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
>
It does not work, the target still receive two copies.
Steve Jenkins put forth on 3/23/2011 7:22 PM:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Joe wrote:
>> IMNSHO it's standard practice to run a dns server on the MX host. If you
>> don't want a full blown bind server, at least run some sort of caching dns
>> server; the difference in the lookup times has a
David Touzeau:
> So is there a tips/HOWTO in order to reject messages that store more
> than 50 emails addresses in BCC header
> or
> it is not possible ?
The Postfix cleanup daemon does not care how many recipients are
in the BCC header.
If you submit mail with an SMTP client, the recipients a
On 25/03/2011 12:06, Peter Sørensen wrote:
I've already used the proxymap solution. We ran into serious problems with the
clustered mysql backend.
I have 5 servers with smtd set to max 300.
I will get back to the proxymap solution. I have adjusted some settings in the
mysql backend.
But still
Peter S?rensen:
> But still - this annoys me. What is triggering postfix to make this behavior?
By running the postmap command every five minutes.
Wietse
I've redone the official doc from your website to the point I don't see
issues.
I need a way to provoke more logging or info out of dovecot smtpd so I can see
why my auth is failing. I need to see more than the message from my ISP. Is
there any way to see more about the dovecot communication wit
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 08:23 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> David Touzeau:
> > So is there a tips/HOWTO in order to reject messages that store more
> > than 50 emails addresses in BCC header
> > or
> > it is not possible ?
>
> The Postfix cleanup daemon does not care how many recipients ar
David Touzeau:
> Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 ? 08:23 -0400, Wietse Venema a ?crit :
> > David Touzeau:
> > > So is there a tips/HOWTO in order to reject messages that store more
> > > than 50 emails addresses in BCC header
> > > or
> > > it is not possible ?
> >
> > The Postfix cleanup daemon does
Walt Shekrota:
> if I telnet localhost smtp I get a lot of seemingly inert debug or trace info
> in the same log which ultimately gets...
> SASL: Connect to private/auth failed: connection refused
This means one or more of the following:
- The Dovecot authentication server does not listen on the
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 08:57 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> David Touzeau:
> > Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 ? 08:23 -0400, Wietse Venema a ?crit :
> > > David Touzeau:
> > > > So is there a tips/HOWTO in order to reject messages that store more
> > > > than 50 emails addresses in BCC header
> >
Zitat von Peter Sørensen :
I've already used the proxymap solution. We ran into serious
problems with the clustered mysql backend.
I have 5 servers with smtd set to max 300.
I will get back to the proxymap solution. I have adjusted some
settings in the mysql backend.
You really should use
* Frank Bonnet :
> On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Frank Bonnet :
> >
> >> smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
> >-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
> >
>
> It does not work, the target still receive two copies.
My changed m
On Friday 25 March 2011 09:09:27 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Walt Shekrota:
> > if I telnet localhost smtp I get a lot of seemingly inert debug or trace
> > info in the same log which ultimately gets...
> > SASL: Connect to private/auth failed: connection refused
>
> This means one or more of the follo
On 03/25/2011 02:47 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Frank Bonnet :
>> On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> * Frank Bonnet :
>>>
smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
>>>-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
>>>
>> It does not work, t
* Frank Bonnet :
> On 03/25/2011 02:47 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Frank Bonnet :
> >> On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >>> * Frank Bonnet :
> >>>
> smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
> >>>-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
Walt Shekrota:
> > > Mar 24 13:57:27 ubu postfix/smtp[15875]: BAD9F82CB0:
> > > to=, relay=199.224.64.207[199.224.64.207]:25,
> > > delay=0.57, delays=0.2/0.03/0.17/0.17, dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced (host
> > > 199.224.64.207[199.224.64.207] said: 554 5.7.1 Error: The message could
> > > not be
>
>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Walt Shekrota
wrote:
>
> ok :( then I am at fault in understanding. The outgoing process must then be
> fully contained within postfix and the sasl2-bin. (still?) The above message
> is the ISP saying "you didn't authenticate". Is smtpd then part of postfix or
> a
On 03/25/2011 03:01 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Frank Bonnet :
>> On 03/25/2011 02:47 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> * Frank Bonnet :
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Frank Bonnet :
>
>> smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
>
On Friday 25 March 2011 10:09:23 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Walt Shekrota:
> > > > Mar 24 13:57:27 ubu postfix/smtp[15875]: BAD9F82CB0:
> > > > to=, relay=199.224.64.207[199.224.64.207]:25,
> > > > delay=0.57, delays=0.2/0.03/0.17/0.17, dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced
> > > > (host 199.224.64.207[199.224.64.
I'm trying to match this and similar phish mail subjects:
Subject: CONGRATULATION YOUR EMAIL HAS WON $500,000.00USD
postmap -q matches this expression, but this is too broad.
/Subject:.*won.*\d.*/ REJECT Probable phish
In the second, and variations, escaping the $ doesn't seem to wo
Wietse:
> The remote SMTP server rejects mail from your Postfix SMTP client.
> To configure SASL authentication in your Postfix SMTP client, see
> http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl (Configuring
> SASL authentication in the Postfix SMTP/LMTP client).
Walt Shekrota:
> Ok yes that i
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Frank Bonnet :
>
>> smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
>
>-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
>
You means this instead ?
#
# Postfix master process configuration file. For details on the for
* Frank Bonnet :
> On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Frank Bonnet :
> >
> >> smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
> >
> >-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
> >
>
> You means this instead ?
>
>
> #
> # Postfix master process
On 03/25/2011 03:31 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * Frank Bonnet :
>>
>>> smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
>>
>>-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
>>
>
> You means this instead ?
>
>
> #
> # Post
On Friday 25 March 2011 10:09:23 Wietse Venema wrote:
> The remote SMTP server rejects mail from your Postfix SMTP client.
>
> To configure SASL authentication in your Postfix SMTP client, see
> http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl (Configuring
> SASL authentication in the Postfix S
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> You simply need a caching resolver on an MX/outbound, not a zone server.
> A zone server is useless in this case.
Yep - I know that now. :)
> I use PowerDNS Recursor on my MX/outbound and never had a problem.
> Under Debian it's a 3 minute
> On Friday 25 March 2011 10:09:23 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The remote SMTP server rejects mail from your Postfix SMTP client.
> >
> > To configure SASL authentication in your Postfix SMTP client, see
> > http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl (Configuring
> > SASL authentication in t
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
/Subject:.*won.*\$\d.*/ REJECT Probable phish
/Subject:.*won \$\d.*/REJECT Probable phish
What the heck am I missing WRT making $ literal?
Likely that it must be quoted/escaped correctly in the shell:
$ cat won_money
/^Subject:.
Rob Foehl put forth on 3/25/2011 10:03 AM:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> /Subject:.*won.*\$\d.*/ REJECT Probable phish
>> /Subject:.*won \$\d.*/REJECT Probable phish
>>
>> What the heck am I missing WRT making $ literal?
>
> Likely that it must be quoted/e
On Friday 25 March 2011 11:01:58 Wietse Venema wrote:
> You must first fix the problem with SENDING MAIL to the REMOTE SERVER.
> The REMOTE SERVER is not on localhost port 25.
ok point taken... the server in that doc is the remote isp then obviously I
picked up a bad idea in some doc. So when I
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Walt Shekrota
wrote:
>
> ok point taken... the server in that doc is the remote isp then obviously I
> picked up a bad idea in some doc. So when I telnet auth with the remote its
> fine.
> 235 2.7.0 Authentication successful
>
> I'm grasping here trying to find wa
On 3/25/2011 11:12 AM, Walt Shekrota wrote:
> On Friday 25 March 2011 11:01:58 Wietse Venema wrote:
>> You must first fix the problem with SENDING MAIL to the REMOTE SERVER.
>> The REMOTE SERVER is not on localhost port 25.
> ok point taken... the server in that doc is the remote isp then obviousl
On Friday 25 March 2011 11:28:26 Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> 1. The authentication really happened when postfix/smtp tried deliver?
I used telnet to verify that I truely have THE RIGHT ID AND PW
Now I look in the /etc/postfix/sasl_password I created and see it the same so
I am at a loss undesta
On Friday 25 March 2011 11:32:01 Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> > smtp.frontier.com wshekro...@frontier.com:x
> > relayhost = 199.224.64.207
>
> smtp.frontier.com != 199.224.64.207
>
> As documented, they MUST be equal
yes I read that last night and fixed it. Something I alternative
Walt Shekrota:
> On Friday 25 March 2011 11:32:01 Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> > > smtp.frontier.com wshekro...@frontier.com:x
> > > relayhost = 199.224.64.207
> >
> > smtp.frontier.com != 199.224.64.207
> >
> > As documented, they MUST be equal
>
> yes I read that last night and
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:47:03AM -0400, Walt Shekrota wrote:
> On Friday 25 March 2011 11:32:01 Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> > > smtp.frontier.com wshekro...@frontier.com:x
> > > relayhost = 199.224.64.207
> >
> > smtp.frontier.com != 199.224.64.207
> >
> > As documented, they MU
On Friday 25 March 2011 12:34:37 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> 1. Why did you switch from ssmtp? It's possible, even likely, that
>your needs would be better served by a null SMTP client, rather
>than a MTA such as Postfix.
>
Like you said this enables you to use a single client to access your mai
> I installed both pdns-recursor and unbound (running without any zone
> data) on a test box and got very similar performance results from
> both. We happened to go with unbound, but based on your
> recommendation, maybe I'll give pdns-recursor another look (it's still
> running on our test box).
Hello,
Sometimes I want to sent out email from 2nd instance of Postfix bypassing
scanner, can someone tell me the command to sent email using 2nd instance of
Postfix?
I used a while ago and can't remember full command and I'm not very familiar
with Postfix
# postfix -c /etc/postfix2 -t < messag
Le 25/03/2011 15:55, Steve Jenkins a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> You simply need a caching resolver on an MX/outbound, not a zone server.
>> A zone server is useless in this case.
>
> Yep - I know that now. :)
>
>> I use PowerDNS Recursor on my MX/outbound
>
> http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl_enable
>
>
Trust me I've been through a lot of your documents and some several times.
What does come to mind going through these is ...
1. Somehow I have to convey that I'm coming from a non existant domain (mine)
and the remote side d
motty.cruz:
> Hello,
> Sometimes I want to sent out email from 2nd instance of Postfix bypassing
> scanner, can someone tell me the command to sent email using 2nd instance of
> Postfix?
> I used a while ago and can't remember full command and I'm not very familiar
> with Postfix
>
> # postfix -
Wietse Venema:
> motty.cruz:
> > Hello,
> > Sometimes I want to sent out email from 2nd instance of Postfix bypassing
> > scanner, can someone tell me the command to sent email using 2nd instance of
> > Postfix?
> > I used a while ago and can't remember full command and I'm not very familiar
> >
Thanks! I appreciated.
-motty
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 11:34 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: 2nd instance of Postfix
Wietse Venema:
> motty.cruz:
> > Hello,
> > Sometimes I w
On 3/25/2011 1:26 PM, Walt Shekrota wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl_enable
Trust me I've been through a lot of your documents and some several times.
What does come to mind going through these is ...
1. Somehow I have to convey that I'm coming from a non existan
Le 25/03/2011 09:59, Peter Sørensen a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I am using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS with postfix 2.7.0
>
> I have suddenly discovered a lot of the following in some of my mailservers
> ( 5) mail.logs:
>
> Mar 19 02:27:37 mxgw2.sdu.dk postfix/smtpd[5173]: table
> hash:/etc/postfix/myrelayd
Walt Shekrota:
> > http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl_enable
>
> Trust me I've been through a lot of your documents and some several times.
These are simple instructions to turn on SASL authentication.
Nothing more, nothing less. If the instructions don't work, then
show what yo
On 03/25/2011 01:06 PM, Peter Sørensen wrote:
I've already used the proxymap solution. We ran into serious problems with the
clustered mysql backend.
I have 5 servers with smtd set to max 300.
If you're allowing 1500 concurrent smtpd's to query - say - a dozen maps
each, the default value
On Friday 25 March 2011 14:44:07 Noel Jones wrote:
> If you're having trouble reading the logs, it's possible
> someone here might know what to make of those messages.
>
> If you need help, please see:
> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
>
> In particular, show us "postconf -n" outpu
Does anyone have a simple policy daemon written in Python they would be willing
to share? I was looking at policy but that's overkill and it might require some
tweaking just to support my tiny requirements.
Gary Smith
Hi postfix-users,
is it possible to share credentials among multiple ldap table files?
E.g. if I have
/etc/postfix/ldap/users
/etc/postfix/ldap/aliases
/etc/postfix/ldap/groups
and in main.cf the
virtual_mailbox_maps = /etc/postfix/ldap/users
virtual_alias_maps = /etc/postfix/ldap/aliases,
On Friday, March 25, 2011 05:35:01 pm Gary Smith wrote:
> Does anyone have a simple policy daemon written in Python they would be
> willing to share? I was looking at policy but that's overkill and it might
> require some tweaking just to support my tiny requirements.
>
> Gary Smith
Sure.
https:
> Sure.
>
> https://launchpad.net/pypolicyd-spf
>
> Scott K
Scott,
Thanks. Looks much simpler than the other ones that I have looked at. I really
need to have a single check for sasl_username and compare it against a set of
canned rules from stats in a memcached server, and either return "DUN
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Walt Shekrota
wrote:
> Mar 25 16:55:39 ubu postfix/qmgr[560]: 3485281365: from=,
> size=505, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
[..]
>
> smtp.frontier.com:25 wshekr...@frontier.com:mypassword
. The sender (MAIL FROM) is equals to authentication user (AUTH)?
No: wshekr...@fro
Timo Veith:
> ldap_table(5) says that a ldap table file has the same format as main.cf.
>
> Can I just put
>
> server_host
> search_base =
> bind =
> bind_dn =
> bind_pw =
> version =
> ..
>
> in main.cf and leave the other parameters in the files mentioned above?
Nope, the format for main.cf p
On Friday 25 March 2011 18:19:32 Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Walt Shekrota
>
> wrote:
> > Mar 25 16:55:39 ubu postfix/qmgr[560]: 3485281365:
> > from=, size=505, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
>
> [..]
>
> >
> > smtp.frontier.com:25 wshekr...@frontier.com:mypassword
Am 26.03.2011 00:32, schrieb Walt Shekrota:
> On Friday 25 March 2011 18:19:32 Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Walt Shekrota
>>
>> wrote:
>>> Mar 25 16:55:39 ubu postfix/qmgr[560]: 3485281365:
>>> from=, size=505, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
>>
>> [..]
>>
>>>
>>> smtp
77 matches
Mail list logo
