> I installed both pdns-recursor and unbound (running without any zone > data) on a test box and got very similar performance results from > both. We happened to go with unbound, but based on your > recommendation, maybe I'll give pdns-recursor another look (it's still > running on our test box).
We switched from bind to unbound for our mailer's and content filter's DNS server a couple of months ago, I think it was as good choice: lean, mean and designed from grounds up with standards, security, speed, low footprint and DNSSEC in mind. (I even run unbound on a laptop natively under Win7 as its only resolver/server :) Mark
