mouss put forth on 3/6/2011 7:03 PM:
> /^.*foo/
> means "it starts with something followed by foo". and this is the same
> thing as "it contains foo", which is represented by
> /foo/
I was taught to always start my expressions with "/^" and end them with
"$/". Why did Steven teach me to do this
Reid Thompson put forth on 3/6/2011 9:07 PM:
> What I would like to do:
> Configure my home postfix server (ubuntu) to:
> send email from local user accounts
> accept external (through my cable modem) smtp requests/relay mail for
> only authorized senders
> I.E. when I'm using a public int
I am running a Debian Lenny machine with Postfix 2.5.5 and Dovecot 2.0.8.
Up until now I ran Postfix with the Procmail delivery agent succesfully.
The machine has only local users; I am not using virtual mailboxes. Due to
obvious reasons I want to switch to Dovecot LDA delivery, through LMTP.
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 18:46:44 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> > In order to have postfix 2.8.1 feeding email to a ezmlm 1.2.17
> If you follow the mlmmj website's instructions, then it should
> work.
Do you mean the README.Postfix at
http://mlmmj.org/archive/mlmmj/att-0511/README.postfix ?
>
On 2011-03-07 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> mouss put forth on 3/6/2011 7:03 PM:
>> /^.*foo/
>> means "it starts with something followed by foo". and this is the same
>> thing as "it contains foo", which is represented by
>> /foo/
>
> I was taught to always start my expressions with "/^" and end them
> w
On 6 mrt 2011, at 22:34, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 3/6/2011 9:08 AM, DTNX/NGMX Postmaster wrote:
>>
>> I suspect that if you were to increase logging detail, you'd find that
>> 'permit_sasl_authenticated' evaluates to zero during the client restrictions
>> stage because of a delay in getting back
On 3/7/2011 4:47 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I was taught to always start my expressions with "/^" and end them with
"$/". Why did Steven teach me to do this if it's not necessary?
That's good advice when you're actually matching something.
The special case of .* means, as you know, "anything o
myrdhin bzh put forth on 3/7/2011 1:53 AM:
> No, it's not SPAM.
Ok, agreed, not spam.
> In fact, zeDomain.tld is a french know domain : wanadoo.fr (and orange.fr).
> :(
The same 10 servers handle mail for both wanadoo.fr and orange.fr. All
Postfix controls relevant to your issue available in
On 3/7/2011 7:21 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
myrdhin bzh put forth on 3/7/2011 1:53 AM:
No, it's not SPAM.
Ok, agreed, not spam.
In fact, zeDomain.tld is a french know domain : wanadoo.fr (and orange.fr). :(
The same 10 servers handle mail for both wanadoo.fr and orange.fr. All
Postfix cont
Noel Jones put forth on 3/7/2011 7:00 AM:
> On 3/7/2011 4:47 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>> I was taught to always start my expressions with "/^" and end them with
>> "$/". Why did Steven teach me to do this if it's not necessary?
>
> That's good advice when you're actually matching something.
O
Mark Alan:
> But in this case, as this is rather generic regarding MLM proper
> interfacing with Postfix, it sure would be welcome to have your
> view about the proper way to setup a generic interface between Postfix
> and a generic MLM.
Sorry, I don't have time to review all the instructions on t
On 3/7/2011 8:13 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Noel Jones put forth on 3/7/2011 7:00 AM:
On 3/7/2011 4:47 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I was taught to always start my expressions with "/^" and end them with
"$/". Why did Steven teach me to do this if it's not necessary?
That's good advice when you'r
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 09:43:40 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> The basic idea is that with a local aliases
> file, file ownership determines the execution privileges for
> "|command" and /file/name destinations, and the envelope sender
> address for non-delivery notifications.
Meaning that (kee
I've followed the discussion in the thread.
Is it possible to for example make configuration with:
- two SMTP(Postfix)/POP&IMAP(maildb) servers in front;
- two db servers(PostgreSQL) working in active-active (both read&write)
configuration behind?
I would like to have configuration in which failur
Am 07.03.2011 17:14, schrieb Rafał Radecki:
> I've followed the discussion in the thread.
>
> Is it possible to for example make configuration with:
> - two SMTP(Postfix)/POP&IMAP(maildb) servers in front;
> - two db servers(PostgreSQL) working in active-active (both read&write)
> configuration
Firstly, can someone point me to a link on setting up just
a plain Unix mailbox (no LDAP, no fanciful stuff). I know
how to use useradd to create a Unix account & nothing
more about getting it to be able to receive external emails.
Is saslauth needed for postfix to be able to receive mails?
I'
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:01:21AM +0900, Peter Evans wrote:
> At the same time, please go here and request removal from the PBL.
>http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL043205
PBL removal will not be done for a host with generic rDNS. I am in a
PBL block too, but my host has custom reverse DNS.
Am 07.03.2011 17:23, schrieb sunhux G:
> Firstly, can someone point me to a link on setting up just
> a plain Unix mailbox (no LDAP, no fanciful stuff). I know
> how to use useradd to create a Unix account & nothing
> more about getting it to be able to receive external emails.
>
> Is saslauth
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:39:29AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> I'm running postfix version 2.8.1 from Debian.
>
> I've got basic pcre header checks working as they should. I'm trying
> to reject mail that has a DKIM signature that says its from att.net
> but a Message-ID ending in 'yahoo.
Hello,
I've updated the Postfix packages for Solaris 10 to 2.8.1.
Features:
- Native SysV Solaris package
- Build with Sun Studio 12.1
- Linked against the native LDAP libraries
- No dependencies against 3rd party packages
- SMF support
- Sparse zone safe
- Jumpstart safe
Packaging fixes:
- Vers
Noel Jones put forth on 3/7/2011 7:37 AM:
> On 3/7/2011 7:21 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> I would suggest you grep your mail log for all outbound smtp connections
>> to these 10 IP addresses, and document all the recipient domains. Then
>> add all these domains to your slow transport map. If you
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:55:34AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Unfortunately, the newer postfix rate delay controls are still based on
> > the recipient domain, not the MX destination.
>
> Yeah. He can absolutely fix his current problem with it. But if he has
> to configure huge delays to a
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 06:50:15PM +0100, ??hsan??Do??an wrote:
>
> Features:
> - Native SysV Solaris package
> - Build with Sun Studio 12.1
> - Linked against the native LDAP libraries
> - No dependencies against 3rd party packages
> - SMF support
> - Sparse zone safe
> - Jumpstart safe
The pac
Victor Duchovni:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 06:50:15PM +0100, ??hsan??Do??an wrote:
>
> >
> > Features:
> > - Native SysV Solaris package
> > - Build with Sun Studio 12.1
> > - Linked against the native LDAP libraries
> > - No dependencies against 3rd party packages
> > - SMF support
> > - Sparse
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 01:35:13PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> You must:
>
> - Execute "postfix upgrade-configuration" after installing postfix.
>
> - Respect pathname and mail_owner etc. settings in existing main.cf files.
This is done:
\$BASEDIR/usr/sbin/chroot \$BASEDIR /usr/sbin/post
Noel Jones put forth on 3/7/2011 9:49 AM:
> On 3/7/2011 8:13 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Noel Jones put forth on 3/7/2011 7:00 AM:
>>> On 3/7/2011 4:47 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I was taught to always start my expressions with "/^" and end them with
"$/". Why did Steven teach me to d
CERT/CC announces a flaw today in multiple STARTTLS implementations.
This problem was silently fixed in Postfix 2.8 and 2.9. Updates
for Postfix 2.[4-7] are made available via the usual channels.
Wietse
Plaintext injection in multiple implementations of STARTTLS
==
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.7.3.html]
Postfix legacy releases 2.7.3, 2.6.9, 2.5.12 and 2.4.16 are available.
These releases contain a fix for CVE-2011-0411 which allows plaintext
command injection with SMTP sessions o
Hello,
> I would suggest you grep your mail log for all outbound smtp connections to
>these
> 10 IP addresses, and document all the recipient domains. Then add all these
> domains to your slow transport map. If you still get those 421 errors,
>completely
> disable concurrency. If you still g
I've searched but haven't found quite what I'm trying to do. I have
found a couple of similar questions here but no answer to my problem.
I have a dozen outbound Postfix mail servers (vers. 2.5.5-6.8 & 2.5.2)
processing a relatively large amount of e-mail from a "service" account,
which trigg
Paul:
> I was
> asked to config the outbound mail servers to quit returning deferred
> message delivery notifications back to our mail server but I'm not
> really seeing way to do that.
The simplest option is to set delay_warning_time=0.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#delay_warning_ti
Hi Wietse
I would like to say THANK YOU for postfix because i know
developers are hearing this words not often enough as long
their "baby" is running well and nobody takes notice about
Especially for the great documentation and crazy online-times
on the mailing-list :-)
--
Reindl Harald
the lo
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> You are lucky this does not work.
This is my own private mail server that serves me and my immediate
family. If I break stuff everyone on the receiviing end knows who
to complain to.
> Much of the att.net mail infrastructure
> is operated by Yahoo.
Over the last many mo
Reindl Harald:
> Hi Wietse
>
> I would like to say THANK YOU for postfix because i know
> developers are hearing this words not often enough as long
> their "baby" is running well and nobody takes notice about
Thanks. I guess this situation is similar to that of a sysadmin
when systems are runnin
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > DKIM signatures are also added in messages handled
> > by lists, ... What you are attemtping to do is a bad idea based on a
> > deep misconception of the role of DKIM in email processing.
>
> I think I have a fair handle on it. However, my opinion on DKIM
> is that
Le 07/03/2011 11:47, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> mouss put forth on 3/6/2011 7:03 PM:
>
>> /^.*foo/
>> means "it starts with something followed by foo". and this is the same
>> thing as "it contains foo", which is represented by
>> /foo/
>
> I was taught to always start my expressions with "/^" and
On 3/7/2011 4:57 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
DKIM signatures are also added in messages handled
by lists, ... What you are attemtping to do is a bad idea based on a
deep misconception of the role of DKIM in email processing.
I think I have a fair handle on it. Ho
Le 07/03/2011 11:47, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> mouss put forth on 3/6/2011 7:03 PM:
>
>> /^.*foo/
>> means "it starts with something followed by foo". and this is the same
>> thing as "it contains foo", which is represented by
>> /foo/
>
> I was taught to always start my expressions with "/^" and
Le 07/03/2011 15:13, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> Noel Jones put forth on 3/7/2011 7:00 AM:
>> On 3/7/2011 4:47 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>>
>>> I was taught to always start my expressions with "/^" and end them with
>>> "$/". Why did Steven teach me to do this if it's not necessary?
>>
>> That's goo
it is necessary to consider the option
parent_domain_matches_subdomains =
Le mardi 08 mars 2011 à 00:45 +0100, mouss a écrit :
> Le 07/03/2011 15:13, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> > Noel Jones put forth on 3/7/2011 7:00 AM:
> >> On 3/7/2011 4:47 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I was taught to al
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:08:09 am Wietse Venema wrote:
> This is a writeup about a flaw that I found recently, and that
> existed in multiple implementations of SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer
> Protocol) over TLS (Transport Layer Security) including my Postfix
> open source mailserver. I give an overview
Noel Jones wrote:
> take a look at milter-regexp.
Thanks, I'll check it out.
Cheers,
Erik
--
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 12:59:15PM +1100, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:08:09 am Wietse Venema wrote:
> > This is a writeup about a flaw that I found recently, and that
> > existed in multiple implementations of SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer
> > Protocol) over TLS (Transport Layer Securit
Wietse, thanks for the quick response, and a solution that looks like it
might work. That wouldn't also suppress 5xx bounce notifications, would
it? In order to be good e-mail citizens we have to capture those
undeliverable addresses and remove them from our active mail database.
I'm assuming t
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 23:47:30 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
Especially for the great documentation
Not to mention this list and the vast knowledge all the subscribers
have to offer. It has been invaluable.
Hello,
smtpd_sasl_path = inet:localhost:1434
seems to work but it is not documented.
As documented:
smtpd_sasl_path (default: smtpd)
Implementation-specific information that the Postfix SMTP server
passes
through to the SASL plug-in implementation that is selected
with
46 matches
Mail list logo
