Re: test submission on 587

On Feb 27, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > jeffrey j donovan: >> greetings >> how can i test submission to port 587 from command line ? >> >> I am setting up a relay for my some users to use when they are off site. >> Those that have verizon need to use 587 >> I want to watch each ste

Re: test submission on 587

On 2/28/2011 9:13 AM, jeffrey j donovan wrote: If the port requires TLS: $ openssl s_client -quiet -starttls smtp -connect host:587 helo client.example.com mail from: etc. Otherwise: $ telnet host 587 helo client.example.com mail from: etc. Wietse thank you all looks like Im working

Re: test submission on 587

On Feb 28, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Daniel Bromberg wrote: > On 2/28/2011 9:13 AM, jeffrey j donovan wrote: >> If the port requires TLS: >>> $ openssl s_client -quiet -starttls smtp -connect host:587 >>> helo client.example.com >>> mail from: >>> etc. >>> >>> Otherwise: >>> >>> $ telnet host 587 >>> h

Re: test submission on 587

jeffrey j donovan: > Thanks > I guess blew past that,.. okay so just kill the session and use > a client. I thought i would be able to then send or type a test > message like MAIL FROM: soandso > -j You can ( openssl s_client -connect host:port provided that you avoid the R and Q chara

question about multiple postfix server

Hello about a post in the past, now i've more details about what i'm going to realize. I've a mx mail server that riceive mail for a single domain (example.com) This Mx frontend server need to dispatch some mail to server1 external ip1 and other to server2 external ip2 like: a...@example.com -

Re: test submission on 587

On 2/28/2011 11:17 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: jeffrey j donovan: Thanks I guess blew past that,.. okay so just kill the session and use a client. I thought i would be able to then send or type a test message like MAIL FROM: soandso -j You can ( openssl s_client -connect host:port provid

Re: test submission on 587

# openssl s_client -connect smtp.example.com:465 220 smtp.example.com ESMTP Postfix HELO example.com 250 example.com AUTH login 334 VXNlcm5hbWU6 [the base64 encoding of "Username:" ZGFuaWVsQGJhc2V6ZW4uY29t [base64 encoding of "dan...@basezen.com"] 334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6 [and of "Password:"] [base64

Re: test submission on 587

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011, Daniel Bromberg wrote: > HELO example.com Wrong. If you want to use extensions, you have to use EHLO. > 250 example.com > AUTH login > MAIL FROM: Wrong. See the RFC, no space after ":". > RCPT TO: See above.

Re: question about multiple postfix server

On 28/02/2011 17:30, Matteo Cazzador wrote: Hello about a post in the past, now i've more details about what i'm going to realize. I've a mx mail server that riceive mail for a single domain (example.com) This Mx frontend server need to dispatch some mail to server1 external ip1 and other to se

Re: test submission on 587

On 2/28/2011 12:25 PM, Claus Assmann wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011, Daniel Bromberg wrote: HELO example.com Wrong. If you want to use extensions, you have to use EHLO. 250 example.com AUTH login MAIL FROM: Wrong. See the RFC, no space after ":". RCPT TO: See above. This is at least somewh

Re: test submission on 587

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 01:53:39PM -0500, Daniel Bromberg wrote: > Obviously my > example was from a Postfix server, and obviously it worked. So I have a > little trouble with "wrong". Sure, but for posterity the list archives can reasonably steer future readers away from incorrect (even if tol

Re: test submission on 587

On 2/28/2011 12:53 PM, Daniel Bromberg wrote: On 2/28/2011 12:25 PM, Claus Assmann wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011, Daniel Bromberg wrote: HELO example.com Wrong. If you want to use extensions, you have to use EHLO. 250 example.com AUTH login MAIL FROM: Wrong. See the RFC, no space after ":".

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

--On Friday, February 25, 2011 11:02 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: The MySQL FOSS exception, however, does not broadly include all OSI licenses. Victor, Thanks for the information, very useful. I would be particularly curious to know if Postfix is now licensed under the CPL rather th

Re: Postfix/Upstart, the final conclusion

On 02/27/2011 10:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 27.02.2011 21:55, schrieb Jeroen Geilman: On 02/27/2011 08:34 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: sorry that was because normally i use "reply all" what is needed on some mailing-lists which are sending the message with "from" as the users address

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

Quanah Gibson-Mount: > wrote: > > >> The MySQL FOSS exception, however, does not broadly include all OSI > >> licenses. > > > > Victor, > > > > Thanks for the information, very useful. I would be particularly curious > > to know if Postfix is now licensed under the CPL rather than the IPL. > > W

Re: Postfix/Upstart, the final conclusion

Am 28.02.2011 21:23, schrieb Jeroen Geilman: > Again, not making any sense; there is no "bug" in Thunderbird sure, a usability bug because if the MUA detects that it is a mailing-list-message it would be no fault if the standard reply-action would be "send to list" instead forcing the user to t

THREAD KILL (Postfix/Upstart, etc.)

Take this off-list or be removed from the list. Wietse

Filter based on invalid space WAS Re: test submission on 587

The discussion over the invalid space syntax got me thinking, so I tracked my SMTP traffic for about 45 minutes. The only non-compliant clients were clear spammers, save for two gray-area clients, one using StrongMail -- surprise, surprise a purveyor of mass marketi

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

--On Monday, February 28, 2011 3:37 PM -0500 Wietse Venema wrote: Wieste, will postfix be moving to the CPL, or will it be retaining the IPL? The IPL is the second license under which Postfix was released. With IPL and CPL being similar in spirit (and equally objectionable for OpenBSD, accor

Re: Filter based on invalid space WAS Re: test submission on 587

On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:47:45 -0500 Daniel Bromberg articulated: > The discussion over the invalid space syntax got me thinking, so I > tracked my SMTP traffic for about 45 minutes. The only non-compliant > clients were clear spammers, save for two gray-area clients, one > using StrongMail

Re: Filter based on invalid space WAS Re: test submission on 587

Daniel Bromberg: > The discussion over the invalid space syntax got me thinking, so I > tracked my SMTP traffic for about 45 minutes. The only non-compliant > clients were clear spammers, save for two gray-area clients, one using > StrongMail -- surprise, surprise a

Re: Postfix/Upstart, the final conclusion

Le 27/02/2011 19:33, Wietse Venema a écrit : > Reindl Harald: >> Thank you for your informations and very good documentation! > > Please fix your mail reader. > > My posting had: > > To: Postfix users > Reply-To: Postfix users > > Yet your response was: > > To: Postfix users >

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

Quanah Gibson-Mount: > >> Wieste, will postfix be moving to the CPL, or will it be retaining the > >> IPL? > > > > The IPL is the second license under which Postfix was released. > > With IPL and CPL being similar in spirit (and equally objectionable > > for OpenBSD, according to people I talked to

Re: Postfix/Upstart, the final conclusion

Am 28.02.2011 23:35, schrieb mouss: > Le 27/02/2011 19:33, Wietse Venema a écrit : >> Reindl Harald: >>> Thank you for your informations and very good documentation! >> >> Please fix your mail reader. >> >> My posting had: >> >> To: Postfix users >> Reply-To: Postfix users >> >> Yet yo

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

Le 28/02/2011 23:03, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit : > --On Monday, February 28, 2011 3:37 PM -0500 Wietse Venema > wrote: > >>> Wieste, will postfix be moving to the CPL, or will it be retaining the >>> IPL? >> >> The IPL is the second license under which Postfix was released. >> With IPL and CPL

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

--On Monday, February 28, 2011 11:53 PM +0100 mouss wrote: Certainly allowing postfix to be linked against the MySQL libraries without engendering a license violation is a significant positive. Postfix is highly used among various linux distributions (Debian, Ubuntu, SuSE, RedHat all come to

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

--On Monday, February 28, 2011 5:43 PM -0500 Wietse Venema wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount: >> Wieste, will postfix be moving to the CPL, or will it be retaining the >> IPL? > > The IPL is the second license under which Postfix was released. > With IPL and CPL being similar in spirit (and equally

Re: Postfix/Upstart, the final conclusion

Le 28/02/2011 23:45, Reindl Harald a écrit : > > > Am 28.02.2011 23:35, schrieb mouss: >> Le 27/02/2011 19:33, Wietse Venema a écrit : >>> Reindl Harald: Thank you for your informations and very good documentation! >>> >>> Please fix your mail reader. >>> >>> My posting had: >>> >>> To:

RE: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

Don't be surprised if the ask this list, They have never helped me with my postfix issues. Saludos.                   Ing. Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez           Analista del sector Gobierno   E-mail: aare...@scitum.com.mx Telefono: 91 50 74 00 ext. 7489 Movil: (044) 55 52 98 34 82 -

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

On 03/01/2011 04:23 AM, mouss wrote: postfix is the default MTA in NetBSD. so it seems "some" of the "BSD folks" have no problems with the current licence;-p Speaking of default MTAs, Postfix is the default MTA on Ubuntu Server as well. Mihira.

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

Quanah Gibson-Mount put forth on 2/28/2011 4:03 PM: > Postfix is highly used among > various linux distributions (Debian, Ubuntu, SuSE, RedHat all come to > mind), but with the exception of Redhat, none of them link postfix > against the MySQL libraries by default. I'm no dev so please excuse the

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:22:52PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > With Debian, if I need mysql support I simply install the extra package > postfix-mysql, which depends on libmysqlclient. (This is the same > procedure for acquiring pgsql, pcre, cdb, ldap, etc capability) > > So by installing the

Re: Update Postfix transport file on multiple servers

Hi, Good idea. I'll soon install a centralized logs server (with rsync) for logs retention an alalysis, maybe I will use this server to update Postfix files. It will be in the trusted network, so, I will generate SSH Keys. The private Key will be stored in the trusted network, and the public Key

Re: Update Postfix transport file on multiple servers

Hi, I'll have a look to this tools, I'm curious... Thanks a lot, Luis Victor Duchovni wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:52:17PM -0800, Luis Esteves wrote: > >> >> Many Thanks Victor for the answer. > > An answer anyway, there are a few ways to address this... Some people > would use to

rewrite outgoing from header .

Hi, How to rewrite outgoing from field when source address is from 192.168.10.0/24 ip address? -- Eero