Le 28/02/2011 23:45, Reindl Harald a écrit : > > > Am 28.02.2011 23:35, schrieb mouss: >> Le 27/02/2011 19:33, Wietse Venema a écrit : >>> Reindl Harald: >>>> Thank you for your informations and very good documentation! >>> >>> Please fix your mail reader. >>> >>> My posting had: >>> >>> To: Postfix users <postfix-users@postfix.org> >>> Reply-To: Postfix users <postfix-users@postfix.org> >>> >>> Yet your response was: >>> >>> To: Postfix users <postfix-users@postfix.org> >>> CC: Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> >>> >>> Please respect the Reply-To: header, at least on this mailing list. >>> >>> Wietse >> >> >> there seems to be a bug in Thunderbird: when "reply-to" matches "To", it >> seems to ignore the Reply-to address and include the "From" address when >> replying to all. > > the point was that i normally use "reply-all" in standard-communication > and as example your message has "Reply-To: mouss+nob...@netoyen.net" > so the normal "reply" would never see the list, that is why i > use really the most time "reply-all"
please take the time to understand before shooting. I am not about "reply" vs "reply to all". feel free to Cc me as long as your MUA obeys the "reply-to" header (that is: reply goes to mouss+nobulk@netoyen and not to mouss@ml.netoyen). > > vietses message had really a "reply to " header, but this is overwritten > with "reply-all", and that's the bug. the From header should not be used when Reply-To is present. Try "reply to all" with my post and you'll see what I mean. anyway, let's get this offlist. > but even on a maling-list from a mailserver we should > not think that everybody is reading every header of a message and not > thinking at every mail what button is the best "reply", "reply-all" > or "reply-list" -> so a simple "sorry" with a short descriptin > why as i did should be enough > > with "bug" i meant only that if thunderbird is able to detect a > list-message it could do the right action to make it not necessary > think about every message which button to use >
