Hi,
is there an easy "switch" to getout
of logging "Connection reset by peer" from special ips/net i.e from
loadbalancers or montitoring checks?
for sure only a cosmetic question
snip
1 write [.]:40057: Connection reset by peer
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/
This game should be played with the system-logger
/etc/rsyslog.conf:
:msg, contains, "client=localhost[127.0.0.1]" ~
:msg, contains, "client=unknown[127.0.0.1]" ~
Am 16.02.2011 09:07, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Hi,
> is there an easy "switch" to getout
> of logging "Connection reset by peer" f
Hello,
Postqueue -p command taking so long time to execute, start and stopping the
postfix also the same, in the meanwhile I checked server performance is
quite normal, no load
Is there any clue
Regards
Ejaz
Robert Schetterer:
> Hi,
> is there an easy "switch" to getout
> of logging "Connection reset by peer" from special ips/net i.e from
> loadbalancers or montitoring checks?
> for sure only a cosmetic question
>
> snip
> 1 write [.]:40057: Connection reset by peer
Don't use verbose logg
Ejaz:
> Hello,
>
> Postqueue -p command taking so long time to execute, start and stopping the
> postfix also the same, in the meanwhile I checked server performance is
> quite normal, no load
>
> Is there any clue
You need to provide more specific information, because it actually
matters what en
Am 16.02.2011 09:10, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> This game should be played with the system-logger
>
> /etc/rsyslog.conf:
> :msg, contains, "client=localhost[127.0.0.1]" ~
> :msg, contains, "client=unknown[127.0.0.1]" ~
>
> Am 16.02.2011 09:07, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Hi,
>> is there an easy
Am 16.02.2011 13:55, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 16.02.2011 09:10, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>> This game should be played with the system-logger
>>
>> /etc/rsyslog.conf:
>> :msg, contains, "client=localhost[127.0.0.1]" ~
>> :msg, contains, "client=unknown[127.0.0.1]" ~
>>
>> Am 16.02.2011 09:07
Am 16.02.2011 12:52, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Hi,
>> is there an easy "switch" to getout
>> of logging "Connection reset by peer" from special ips/net i.e from
>> loadbalancers or montitoring checks?
>> for sure only a cosmetic question
>>
>> snip
>> 1 write [.]:40
Robert Schetterer:
> Am 16.02.2011 12:52, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > Robert Schetterer:
> >> Hi,
> >> is there an easy "switch" to getout
> >> of logging "Connection reset by peer" from special ips/net i.e from
> >> loadbalancers or montitoring checks?
> >> for sure only a cosmetic question
> >>
>
Am 16.02.2011 14:04, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 16.02.2011 13:55, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 16.02.2011 09:10, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>> This game should be played with the system-logger
>>>
>>> /etc/rsyslog.conf:
>>> :msg, contains, "client=localhost[127.0.0.1]" ~
>>> :msg, contains,
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:03:37 +0300, "Ejaz" wrote:
> Postqueue -p command taking so long time to execute, start and
> stopping the postfix also the same, in the meanwhile I checked
> server performance is quite normal, no load
Is yours /etc/hosts sane?
M.
Am 16.02.2011 14:25, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 16.02.2011 12:52, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>> Robert Schetterer:
Hi,
is there an easy "switch" to getout
of logging "Connection reset by peer" from special ips/net i.e from
loadbalancers or montitoring checks
Just set up postfix & it's running on my RHES 4.2 box.
Immediately after postfix is up, I test sending emails from a permitted
domain
(ahhh, on this postfix server's domain firewall, we even have a firewall
rule
which permits Tcp25 from those few sending domains' SMTP servers) using
an email clie
es the logging, followed by the actual message content.
>
> orginal line without ip
>
> Feb 16 15:00:44 mail01 postfix/postscreen[13410]: warning: write
> [...]:46539: Connection reset by peer
The patch below adds ECONNRESET to the list of bogus errors.
Wietse
[20110216-post
sunhux G:
> maillog:Feb 15 13:43:20 hostname sendmail[7688]: NOQUEUE:
> SYSERR(recipient_id): can not chdir(/var/spool/mqueue/): Permission denied
That is a SENDMAIL error message, not a POSTFIX error message.
Wietse
logs start with a date stamp, the name of the program
>>> that writes the logging, followed by the actual message content.
>>
>> orginal line without ip
>>
>> Feb 16 15:00:44 mail01 postfix/postscreen[13410]: warning: write
>> [...]:46539: Connectio
Hi,
>> I pulled this from the jimsun antispam page. Is this still necessary?
>
> well. the problem with /partial is that it may cause problems with
> filters. how would you scan this for viruses?
Yes, thanks guys for reaffirming what I should have written. I thought
there may be a way to reject b
Thanks a lot Noel - I seem to be on the right track with this, but am
having a problem.
I have set up my system as you described, but with one change. I set
up the virtual_alias file with the line: "@pisd.edu
@oldpisd.edu,@newpisd.edu" rather than every email address - I have a
dynamic userlist
Scott Fitzhugh:
> Thanks a lot Noel - I seem to be on the right track with this, but am
> having a problem.
>
> I have set up my system as you described, but with one change. I set
> up the virtual_alias file with the line: "@pisd.edu
> @oldpisd.edu,@newpisd.edu" rather than every email address
On 2/16/2011 12:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Scott Fitzhugh:
Thanks a lot Noel - I seem to be on the right track with this, but am
having a problem.
I have set up my system as you described, but with one change. I set
up the virtual_alias file with the line: "@pisd.edu
@oldpisd.edu,@newpisd.edu
Wietse - Like my original email said, I am new to postfix, so I have no
idea how to even start something like that.
Daniel - I guess table-driven. Not sure how else to proceed.
Thanks,
Scott
>Daniel Bromberg
>
>Scott,
>Are you fully table-driven? How about some SQL magic to build the
>aliasing
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:36:31 +0800
sunhux G articulated:
> Just set up postfix & it's running on my RHES 4.2 box.
>
> Immediately after postfix is up, I test sending emails from a
> permitted domain
> (ahhh, on this postfix server's domain firewall, we even have a
> firewall rule
> which permit
On 2/16/2011 11:32 AM, Scott Fitzhugh wrote:
Thanks a lot Noel - I seem to be on the right track with this, but am
having a problem.
I have set up my system as you described, but with one change. I set
up the virtual_alias file with the line: "@pisd.edu
@oldpisd.edu,@newpisd.edu" rather than ev
Scott Fitzhugh:
> Wietse - Like my original email said, I am new to postfix, so I have no
> idea how to even start something like that.
I suggest you pull the addresses from some table (they are already
in the computer, after all) and run them through a script (Perl,
AWK, Basic, PHP, whatever).
I
>>> Noel Jones 2/16/2011 12:30 PM >>>
On 2/16/2011 11:32 AM, Scott Fitzhugh wrote:
> Thanks a lot Noel - I seem to be on the right track with this, but
am
> having a problem.
>
> I have set up my system as you described, but with one change. I
set
> up the virtual_alias file with the line: "@pisd
On 2/16/2011 3:03 PM, Scott Fitzhugh wrote:
Noel Jones 2/16/2011 12:30 PM>>>
On 2/16/2011 11:32 AM, Scott Fitzhugh wrote:
Thanks a lot Noel - I seem to be on the right track with this, but
am
having a problem.
I have set up my system as you described, but with one change. I
set
up the vi
Adding something like "tls=none/encrypted/verified/secure" would allow
wimpy programmers like me to be more effective ... as writing a stateful
parser is going to stress my admittedly small fund of programming skill.
Of course, at some point (perhaps at this point!), you'll want to put
your foot d
Hi
Yesterday i sent a testmail and misstyped the domain (.at instead .net)
But why is this mail deferred instead bounced because the remote-server
said "550" what should be a hard bounce?
Feb 16 21:53:29 mail postfix/qmgr[18730]: 650ADBE:
from=, size=1930, nrcpt=1 (queue act
Le 16/02/2011 23:48, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> Hi
>
> Yesterday i sent a testmail and misstyped the domain (.at instead .net)
> But why is this mail deferred instead bounced because the remote-server
> said "550" what should be a hard bounce?
>
>
> Feb 16 21:53:29 mail postfi
Am 16.02.2011 23:53, schrieb mouss:
> Le 16/02/2011 23:48, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>> Hi
>>
>> Yesterday i sent a testmail and misstyped the domain (.at instead .net)
>> But why is this mail deferred instead bounced because the remote-server
>> said "550" what should be a hard bounce?
>>
Le 15/02/2011 20:21, John a écrit :
> First off I am still a bit green on this stuff.
>
> Both my servers are multi-homed, server A which runs Postfix is
> configured -> eth0 :n.n.n.186 and eth1:n.n.n.187.
> The host name for this server is mail.domain.tld which points to n.n.n.187.
>
> Up unti
Sorry for the lack of info in earlier post.
Think the main issue is I can't even start up postfix :
# postfix set-permissions
[root@etc]# postfix start
postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system
[root@ etc]# postfix reload
postfix/postfix-script: fatal: the Postfix mail system is no
[snip]
I think the problem is Postfix is sending using eth0, which in turn
means that it appears to come from n.n.n.186, which in turn means that a
reverse lookup does not resolve to mail.domain.tld. The loop is not
closed and therefor we are suspect.
then why not fix that?
I would like to, unf
On 2/16/2011 10:21 PM, sunhux G wrote:
Sorry for the lack of info in earlier post.
Think the main issue is I can't even start up postfix :
# postfix set-permissions
[root@etc]# postfix start
postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system
[root@ etc]# postfix reload
postfix/postfix-sc
* Reindl Harald :
> > so orange.stuon.com told antispam.stuon.com: 550 5.1.1 ...
> > and
> > antispam.stuon.com converted this to 450 4.1.1 ...
> > thus your postfix got a 450.
> >
> > so the problem is on antispam.stuon.com
>
> *argh*
>
> i looked only at the end of the line :-(
> so they have
35 matches
Mail list logo
