Re: Empty From when generating bounce

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:39:24AM CET, Trigve Siver said: > Hi, > I'm having some problem with bounces. When someone send mail to my mail > server > and sender is not existent, postfix generate bounce. Bounce has empty > envelope > "From" set (from=<>) . I'm using relayhost and when sending b

Re: Should I have postgrey listen on a socket?

Zitat von Stan Hoeppner : Noel Jones put forth on 12/6/2010 11:10 AM: If you decide that greylisting is right for you, postgrey is a popular choice -- it's flexible and reliable. ... See google for benefits and risks of using greylisting if you're not familiar with it. Interestingly, just

Re: Empty From when generating bounce

> From: Erwan David > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Sent: Tue, December 7, 2010 9:05:43 AM > Subject: Re: Empty From when generating bounce > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:39:24AM CET, Trigve Siver said: > > Hi, > > I'm having some problem with bounces. When someone send mail to my mail >se

Re: Empty From when generating bounce

07.12.2010 11:21, Trigve Siver wrote: [] > yes I know but I'm not in charge of realyhost and they (who are in charge) > told > me that they don't accept empty From. Could I somehow change From to some > kind > of "black hole" which will discard all the mails? Postfix tries hard to conform to e

Re: Empty From when generating bounce

> From: Michael Tokarev > To: Trigve Siver > Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org > Sent: Tue, December 7, 2010 10:08:04 AM > Subject: Re: Empty From when generating bounce > > 07.12.2010 11:21, Trigve Siver wrote: > [] > > yes I know but I'm not in charge of realyhost and they (who are in charge) >

R: R: R: MX Backup

* Bissio2000 : > According to the standard configuration explained at > http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html about setting up a > primary and secondary mx, I don't understand how the mx backup returns back > all messages when the primary server come up from down state; I mean

[Resolved] Upgrade version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1

.. I intend to upgrade Postfix version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1. Are there incompatibilities or specific path for upgrade ? Or any manual re-configuration to be done ? .. This server is a Debian Lenny and upgrade will be done via the Debian lenny-backports repository usage wich included Postfix v2.7.1.

Re: Empty From when generating bounce

* Trigve Siver : > Could some post the except from standard where this is defined to be able to > argue with relayhost provider, please? This is all best summed up by section 5.2.9 of RFC1123, which says: The syntax shown in RFC-821 for the MAIL FROM: command omits the case of an empty path: "M

Re: Empty From when generating bounce

> From: Ralf Hildebrandt > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Sent: Tue, December 7, 2010 10:37:20 AM > Subject: Re: Empty From when generating bounce > > This is all best summed up by section 5.2.9 of RFC1123, which says: > > The syntax shown in RFC-821 for the MAIL FROM: command omits the cas

Re: Empty From when generating bounce

* Trigve Siver : > "... Since in most cases it is not appropriate to respond to an automatic > response, and the responder is not interested in delivery status messages, > a > MAIL FROM address of <> MAY be used for this purpose. A MAIL FROM address > which is specifically chosen for

Re: R: R: R: MX Backup

On 07/12/2010 10:25, Bissio2000 wrote: Thanks... it works fine without any field into trasnport map (even if every tutorial on line says to use transport map:) So I'm wondering if I could use all domain name listed into postfix_virtual_domains instead into relay_domains because so i could use o

I: R: R: R: MX Backup

On 07/12/2010 10:25, Bissio2000 wrote: > Thanks... it works fine without any field into trasnport map (even if every > tutorial on line says to use transport map:) > So I'm wondering if I could use all domain name listed into > postfix_virtual_domains instead into relay_domains because so i coul

Re: Empty From when generating bounce

Trigve Siver: > Thanks for reply. > > Could some post the except from standard where this is defined to be able to > argue with relayhost provider, please? RFC 5321 is the current SMTP definition. 6.1. Reliable Delivery and Replies by Email ... If there is a delivery failure after acce

Doubts about some Postfix Configuration Parameters

Hi everyone, I'm with some doubts about some postfix configuration parameters, even after reading [1], not clear to me. They are: fast_flush_domains delay_warning_time [1] - http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html thanks, -- Eduardo Júnior GNU/Linux user #423272 :wq

Postfix resolving domain - NOT dns

Hi list..   I have an issue with postfix resolving a domain - correctly, yet i want it to resolve differently..   The story so far..   Dec  7 00:39:06 newserver postfix/smtpd[13222]: connect from mail-wy0-f176.google.com [74.125.82.176] Dec  7 00:39:06 newserver postfix/smtpd[13222]: 7D53D5C0BB:

Re: Postfix resolving domain - NOT dns

To override the route to the destination: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#transport and pages linked from there. Wietse

Re: Maildrop filtering

Le 05/12/2010 02:51, mouss a écrit : Le 03/12/2010 17:56, Ben a écrit : [snip] All domains are virtual, I managed to pass all mails to maildrop, it works. The problem is that in this configuration, mail are not relayed to other hosts when the user configure mail redirection. A user can tell : ke

Re: Doubts about some Postfix Configuration Parameters

* Eduardo Júnior : > fast_flush_domains > delay_warning_time What exactly? -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962

Re: Doubts about some Postfix Configuration Parameters

2010/12/7 Eduardo Júnior : > Hi everyone, > > > I'm with some doubts about some postfix configuration parameters, > even after reading [1], not clear to me. > > > They are: > > fast_flush_domains > delay_warning_time > Perhaps the best way would be if you tell us what (and how) you understand these

Re: Postfix resolving domain - NOT dns

Thanks Wietse I have had a good read through this lot.. it looks like the transport_maps  is the only bit that does near to what I need... if i understand it correctly, this is done on a per domain level..  where I have lots all diverting to the other server,..  and its the other server resolving

Re: Postfix resolving domain - NOT dns

Postfix resolves SMTP destinations via DNS, /etc/hosts, or it uses the transport map (which can be an SQL database or a local file). If you cannot use DNS for multiple destinations, then you should route ALL SMTP EMAIL through a smarthost. See: http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_READM

Re: Doubts about some Postfix Configuration Parameters

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:51:17AM -0300, Eduardo J?nior wrote: > I'm with some doubts about some postfix configuration parameters, > even after reading [1], not clear to me. > > They are: > > fast_flush_domains > delay_warning_time You need "fast_flush_domains" if want to support ETRN, and or

Different backend authentications for Postfix

Hi: For personal reasons I'm planning to migrate a Zimbra installation to a Postfix+Cyrus IMAP based schema. My Zimbra server has two domains: domain1.com and domain2.com. Users from domain1.com authenticate via Active Directory and domain2.com authenticate via Zimbra (using its own OpenLDAP serve

Re: Different backend authentications for Postfix

Jason Voorhees: > Hi: > > For personal reasons I'm planning to migrate a Zimbra installation to > a Postfix+Cyrus IMAP based schema. My Zimbra server has two domains: > domain1.com and domain2.com. Users from domain1.com authenticate via > Active Directory and domain2.com authenticate via Zimbra (

Re: Different backend authentications for Postfix

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Jason Voorhees: >> Hi: >> >> For personal reasons I'm planning to migrate a Zimbra installation to >> a Postfix+Cyrus IMAP based schema. My Zimbra server has two domains: >> domain1.com and domain2.com. Users from domain1.com authenticate via

Re: Different backend authentications for Postfix

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:45:12PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Jason Voorhees: > > Hi: > > > > For personal reasons I'm planning to migrate a Zimbra installation to > > a Postfix+Cyrus IMAP based schema. My Zimbra server has two domains: > > domain1.com and domain2.com. Users from domain1.com a

Re: Different backend authentications for Postfix

* Jason Voorhees : > Hi: > > For personal reasons I'm planning to migrate a Zimbra installation to > a Postfix+Cyrus IMAP based schema. My Zimbra server has two domains: > domain1.com and domain2.com. Users from domain1.com authenticate via > Active Directory and domain2.com authenticate via Zimbr

Re: Different backend authentications for Postfix

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Jason Voorhees : >> Hi: >> >> For personal reasons I'm planning to migrate a Zimbra installation to >> a Postfix+Cyrus IMAP based schema. My Zimbra server has two domains: >> domain1.com and domain2.com. Users from domain1.com authent

Re: Different backend authentications for Postfix

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:15:46PM -0500, Jason Voorhees wrote: > > A quick sketch of smtpd.conf: > > > > pwcheck_service: saslauthd auxprop > > auxprop_plugin: ldapdb > > mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN > > ldapdb_uri: ldap://localhost > > ldapdb_id: username > > ldapdb_pw: secret > > ldapdb_mech: DIGEST-

Getting connection timed out error

Hello, I am getting the following error whenever try to send email to gmail : connect to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[74.125.79.27]: Connection timed out (port 25) And for rediff : connect to mx.rediffmail.rediff.akadns.net[202.137.235.10]: Connection timed out Can you suggest why this is h

Re: Different backend authentications for Postfix

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:15:46PM -0500, Jason Voorhees wrote: > >> > A quick sketch of smtpd.conf: >> > >> > pwcheck_service: saslauthd auxprop >> > auxprop_plugin: ldapdb >> > mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN >> > ldapdb_uri: ldap://localhost >> >

Re: Getting connection timed out error

Avinash Pawar wrote: Hello, I am getting the following error whenever try to send email to gmail : connect to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [74.125.79.27]: Connection timed out (port 25) And for rediff : connect to mx.rediffmail.rediff.akadns.net

Re: Getting connection timed out error

Hello, What is outage? On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote: > Avinash Pawar wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am getting the following error whenever try to send email to gmail : >> >> connect to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com < >> http://alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com>[74.125.79.27

Re: Getting connection timed out error

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 02:01:18PM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote: >> Hello, >> I am getting the following error whenever try to send email to gmail : >> connect to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com >> [74.125.79.27]: Connection timed >> out (port 25) >> And fo

Re: Should I have postgrey listen on a socket?

lst_ho...@kwsoft.de put forth on 12/7/2010 2:18 AM: > Zitat von Stan Hoeppner : > >> Noel Jones put forth on 12/6/2010 11:10 AM: >> >>> If you decide that greylisting is right for you, postgrey is a popular >>> choice -- it's flexible and reliable. >> ... >>> See google for benefits and risks of u

Re: Should I have postgrey listen on a socket?

Zitat von Stan Hoeppner : lst_ho...@kwsoft.de put forth on 12/7/2010 2:18 AM: Zitat von Stan Hoeppner : Noel Jones put forth on 12/6/2010 11:10 AM: If you decide that greylisting is right for you, postgrey is a popular choice -- it's flexible and reliable. ... See google for benefits and

Re: Postfix resolving domain - NOT dns

Le 07/12/2010 14:25, Michael Holt a écrit : Hi list.. I have an issue with postfix resolving a domain - correctly, yet i want it to resolve differently.. The story so far.. Dec 7 00:39:06 newserver postfix/smtpd[13222]: connect from mail-wy0-f176.google.com [7

fqrdns.pcre

On 12/07/2010 02:30 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Everyone's mileage varies. If you're having good results with Postgrey > you should try the fqrdns.pcre file that I recommended in the thread you > replied to. You'll likely see very quickly why greylisting is redundant > while using that file. I do

Re: verify db with mysql

Wietse Venema: > Thanks for the patch. > > Stefan Jakobs: > > I'am not aware of any dead-lock issues. The sequence pseudo-thread > > will query the database only once with the first key. For every > > next key the sequence pseudo-thread is working with the results > > in the memory. With a very la

Re: fqrdns.pcre

Le 07/12/2010 21:56, Paul Cartwright a écrit : On 12/07/2010 02:30 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Everyone's mileage varies. If you're having good results with Postgrey you should try the fqrdns.pcre file that I recommended in the thread you replied to. You'll likely see very quickly why greylisting

Re: Empty From when generating bounce

On 2010-12-07 2:39 AM, Trigve Siver wrote: > Hi, > I'm having some problem with bounces. When someone send mail to my mail > server > and sender is not existent, postfix generate bounce. Bounce has empty > envelope > "From" set (from=<>) . I'm using relayhost and when sending bounce back I've

Re: fqrdns.pcre

On 12/07/2010 04:02 PM, mouss wrote: > > yes. if it hits, you'll see a reject log. if you're using Stan's file > unmodified, you would see "... Dynamic - Please relay via ISP...". lately I've been getting TONS of emails with all Chinese ( Asian..) characters, coming from email addresses like mkdj

Re: Empty From when generating bounce

Trigve Siver wrote: From: Michael Tokarev To: Trigve Siver Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org Sent: Tue, December 7, 2010 10:08:04 AM Subject: Re: Empty From when generating bounce 07.12.2010 11:21, Trigve Siver wrote: [] yes I know but I'm not in charge of realyhost and they (who are in charge

Re: fqrdns.pcre

CIDR blocking all of China with an auto whitelist for those that you email directly? Works great on my end, thanks to Stan the Man. Thanks Steffan --- T E L 6 0 2 . 7 9 3 . 0 0 1 4 | F A X 6 0 2 . 9 7 1 . 1 6 9 4 Steffan A. Cline

Re: fqrdns.pcre

On 12/07/2010 04:48 PM, Steffan A. Cline wrote: > CIDR blocking all of China with an auto whitelist for those that you email > directly? I don't know anyone in China, I know someone who travels there, but he has a Bellsouth address.. so how do you implement CIDR blocking?? well I see where you can

mail.err localhost error

I keep getting this error, and I have no clue where it comes from. I have no localhost in my fetchmailrc file. here is some of the entries in /var/log/mail.err: Dec 7 16:00:38 paulandcilla fetchmail[16761]: connection to localhost:smtp [::1/25] failed: Connection refused. Dec 7 16:00:40 pauland

Re: Empty From when generating bounce

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:39:53PM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote: > Beating a dead horse, but I would use a relay where the admins do not know > the standards. The admins of that server should delegate duties to someone > else. Perhaps the relay is really an MSA for home MUA users and is not desi

Re: mail.err localhost error

On 12/7/10 11:16 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: I keep getting this error, and I have no clue where it comes from. I have no localhost in my fetchmailrc file. here is some of the entries in /var/log/mail.err: Dec 7 16:00:38 paulandcilla fetchmail[16761]: connection to localhost:smtp [::1/25] faile

Re: fqrdns.pcre

On 12/7/10 11:10 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: On 12/07/2010 04:48 PM, Steffan A. Cline wrote: CIDR blocking all of China with an auto whitelist for those that you email directly? I don't know anyone in China, I know someone who travels there, but he has a Bellsouth address.. so how do you impleme

Re: mail.err localhost error

On 12/07/2010 05:34 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > > Dec 7 16:00:38 paulandcilla fetchmail[16761]: connection to > > localhost:smtp [::1/25] failed: Connection refused. > fetchmail is failing to connect to whatever is running on ipv6 localhost > (0::1 port 25) > > If this is postfix, make sure postfi

Re: fqrdns.pcre

Le 07/12/2010 22:19, Paul Cartwright a écrit : On 12/07/2010 04:02 PM, mouss wrote: yes. if it hits, you'll see a reject log. if you're using Stan's file unmodified, you would see "... Dynamic - Please relay via ISP...". lately I've been getting TONS of emails with all Chinese ( Asian..) char

anvil errors

Hello All, I am getting the following anvil errors, but thought that I was using anvil to control spamassasin performance. I disabled spamassasin recently and commented out anvil and other settings which were thought to be to support spamassasin. Dec 7 19:46:44 pluto postfix/smtpd[17588]:

Re: anvil errors

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 19:49:53 -0500, Jack wrote: > I am getting the following anvil errors, but thought that I was using > anvil to control spamassasin performance. > > I disabled spamassasin recently and commented out anvil and other > settings which were thought to be to support spamassasin.

Re: Should I have postgrey listen on a socket?

lst_ho...@kwsoft.de put forth on 12/7/2010 2:20 PM: > Zitat von Stan Hoeppner : > >> lst_ho...@kwsoft.de put forth on 12/7/2010 2:18 AM: >>> Zitat von Stan Hoeppner : >> Postgrey's auto whitelist feature is on by default. In fact, you can't >> disable it. If you could, Postgrey would break, as

Re: fqrdns.pcre

Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/7/2010 2:56 PM: > On 12/07/2010 02:30 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> Everyone's mileage varies. If you're having good results with Postgrey >> you should try the fqrdns.pcre file that I recommended in the thread you >> replied to. You'll likely see very quickly why gr

Re: fqrdns.pcre

Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/7/2010 4:10 PM: > On 12/07/2010 04:48 PM, Steffan A. Cline wrote: >> CIDR blocking all of China with an auto whitelist for those that you email >> directly? > I don't know anyone in China, I know someone who travels there, but he > has a Bellsouth address.. > so how