* Trigve Siver <trig...@yahoo.com>: > "... Since in most cases it is not appropriate to respond to an automatic > response, and the responder is not interested in delivery status messages, > a > MAIL FROM address of <> MAY be used for this purpose. A MAIL FROM address > which is specifically chosen for the purpose of sending automatic > responses, > and which will not automatically respond to any message sent to it, MAY be > used instead of <>. ... "
That's for a vacation/autoresponder > Is it also relevant with my case? No. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
