Hi,
I have a postfix mail server configured as mail receiving server.
The problem that I am facing is that I am receiving same email every 15 second
from same sender 'pete...@warwick.net' with same message-ID on my production
mail servers, following are my postfix logs:
"Oct 25 01:11:02 g2t04
On 10/27/2010 11:21 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
Hi,
I have a postfix mail server configured as mail receiving server.
The problem that I am facing is that I am receiving same email every 15 second
from same sender 'pete...@warwick.net' with same message-ID on my production
mail servers, followi
I have greylisting on my server, but sometimes I need to allow some external
users to send mail to my server without greylisting. I can't add them to
whitelist, because in most cases it's a new clients, so the good idea is to
ask them to add to mail's subject some code and to accept letters with th
Неворотин Вадим put forth on 10/27/2010 4:47 AM:
> I have greylisting on my server, but sometimes I need to allow some external
> users to send mail to my server without greylisting. I can't add them to
> whitelist, because in most cases it's a new clients, so the good idea is to
> ask them to add
There's a correction in my Postfix 'main.cf' settings in the mail below.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Sharma, Ashish
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 2:52 PM
To: postfix users
Subject: Persistent mails bein
On 10/27/2010 6:19 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
There's a correction in my Postfix 'main.cf' settings in the mail below.
We don't care about random snippings from main.cf. If you
want to show your config, show "postconf -n" output.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access has
Is it somehow possible to make Postfix add a digital signature to
outgoing emails?
Most likely Postfix itself can't do it, but maybe there is some filter
(similar to amavis, or dkimproxy) which can be used with Postfix, which
lets digitally sign email (i.e. if From: is X1, sign with key K1)?
On 27 Oct 2010, at 13:02, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Is it somehow possible to make Postfix add a digital signature to outgoing
> emails?
>
> Most likely Postfix itself can't do it, but maybe there is some filter
> (similar to amavis, or dkimproxy) which can be used with Postfix, which lets
>
Zitat von Tomasz Chmielewski :
Is it somehow possible to make Postfix add a digital signature to
outgoing emails?
Most likely Postfix itself can't do it, but maybe there is some
filter (similar to amavis, or dkimproxy) which can be used with
Postfix, which lets digitally sign email (i.e.
Zitat von Mark Blackman :
On 27 Oct 2010, at 13:02, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Is it somehow possible to make Postfix add a digital signature to
outgoing emails?
Most likely Postfix itself can't do it, but maybe there is some
filter (similar to amavis, or dkimproxy) which can be used with
Can somebody comment on this please.
В Вто, 26/10/2010 в 18:20 +0300, Покотиленко Костик пишет:
> I'm now trying to move all RBL and RHSBL checks to policyd-weight. In
> policyd-weight I set "$ADD_X_HEADER = 1" and very high score so it never
> match.
>
> Then I plan to parse "X-policyd-weight" h
On 27 Oct 2010, at 13:11, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> Zitat von Mark Blackman :
>
>> On 27 Oct 2010, at 13:02, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>
>>> Is it somehow possible to make Postfix add a digital signature to outgoing
>>> emails?
>>>
>>> Most likely Postfix itself can't do it, but maybe the
Zitat von Mark Blackman :
On 27 Oct 2010, at 13:11, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Mark Blackman :
On 27 Oct 2010, at 13:02, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Is it somehow possible to make Postfix add a digital signature to
outgoing emails?
Most likely Postfix itself can't do it, but ma
Go figure the most important TLS lib too. That's what happens when your eyes
are tired.
Thanks Victor.
Paul.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 5:13 PM
To: postfix-
Wietse Venema:
> > This got me wondering if there's any easy way to have anvil report
> > stats based on the authenticated SASL username, in addition to the
> > remote IP address?
>
> Not at the moment, but a policy daemon could notice that (too) many
> connections use the same sasl_username attri
On 10/27/2010 10:37 AM, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
I hope that someone can help me. Last night I had a strange
problem. Every email that came in was there twice. Emails that
I would normally get 2 copies of, I received 4 copies of. Any
ideas on what could cause this?
Careful examination of the logs wi
"Brian Evans - Postfix List" wrote:
Did you run postmap on the client_whitelist file like you need to for
every hash file?
sorry but I have forgot postmap command !
if I would insert another ip address in client_whitelist file I must:
85.18.95.xx permit_auth_destination
85.18.95.yy permit_auth
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 07:20:52PM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 01:15:13PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > If the configuration was the same with 2.4.5, it did not appear after
> > the upgrade, rather you were testing/looking harder, and the mix
> > of clients or client
So far, I've been managing virtual users in a database. Works great, allows you
lot of flexibility.
However, this is not the case with pipes for virtual users.
To add pipes for virtual users, I've been doing the below configuration:
master.cf:
mypipe unix - n n - - pipe flags=O user=someuser:
Tomasz Chmielewski:
> It works OK, but I'd rather keep it in MySQL only, or, have it somehow
> without having to edit master.cf each time.
>
> Is it possible?
Except for the local aliases map, no Postfix table supports "please
execute this command line".
Wietse
Hello all,
I am a bit confused about setting restrictions on which domains can
send through my server. I am utilizing some reject_rbl_client
directives to check mail with free spam repositories. One of the valid
domains sending to this server was blacklisted by one of the
repositories. I would lik
Attached is the output:
# postconf -n
to use for recipients that are not found in the UNIX passwd database.
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = amavisfeed:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
data_directo
* Sharma, Ashish :
> Attached is the output:
> # postconf -n
... doesn't list smtpd_recipient_restritions!
...
> setgid_group = postdrop
> inet:localhost:10028,calhost:10026,
> permit_rbl_client bl.spamcop.netrg,ix/senderRestrictionList,
> reject_unauth_destination,onList,
> smtpd_tls_ask_cc
Attached is the output:
# postconf -n
to use for recipients that are not found in the UNIX passwd database.
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = amavisfeed:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
data_direct
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 02:31:25PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Tomasz Chmielewski:
> > It works OK, but I'd rather keep it in MySQL only, or, have it somehow
> > without having to edit master.cf each time.
> >
> > Is it possible?
>
> Except for the local aliases map, no Postfix table supports
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 07:30:07PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Rok Poto??nik writes:
> > and last but not least... postqueue -p and wish of printing out sender's
> > ip address:
> > I really miss a possibility of postqueue to print out client's IP
> > address, sometimes it would really help me
On 10/27/2010 1:41 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
Would I just add the IP(s) of the
domain that I want to accept to mynetworks, make sure that happens
No, only networks under your control should be added to
mynetworks.
For outsiders that may be on RBLs, you need to maintain a
separate whiteli
On 10/27/2010 08:47 PM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
Attached is the output:
# postconf -n
to use for recipients that are not found in the UNIX passwd database.
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = amavisfeed:[127.0.0.1]:10024
dae
Hi,
On Oct 27, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/27/2010 10:37 AM, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
I hope that someone can help me. Last night I had a strange
problem. Every email that came in was there twice. Emails that
I would normally get 2 copies of, I received 4 copies of. Any
ideas on what
On 10/27/2010 4:44 PM, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
On Oct 27, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/27/2010 10:37 AM, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
I hope that someone can help me. Last night I had a strange
problem. Every email that came in was there twice. Emails that
I would normally get 2 copies of, I
Noel,
Thanks so much. Your directions are very easy to follow. It is good to
know that mynetworks is truly reserved for *My* Networks.
Christopher Adams
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/27/2010 1:41 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
>>
>> Would I just add the IP(s) of the
On 27.10.2010 19:30, Mark Martinec wrote:
Rok Potočnik writes:
and last but not least... postqueue -p and wish of printing out sender's
ip address:
I really miss a possibility of postqueue to print out client's IP
address, sometimes it would really help me out debugging some problems
and even th
Неворотин Вадим put forth on 10/27/2010 10:51 AM:
> I can't add clients to whitelist because I don't know their addresses. One
> of our manager call to client with phone and say him email address. And in
> this case manager should receive a letter without greylisting, so in fact I
> need some metho
Stan Hoeppner:
> ? ? put forth on 10/27/2010 10:51 AM:
> > I can't add clients to whitelist because I don't know their addresses. One
> > of our manager call to client with phone and say him email address. And in
> > this case manager should receive a letter without greylisting, so in f
Hi Noel,
On Oct 27, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/27/2010 4:44 PM, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
On Oct 27, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/27/2010 10:37 AM, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
Turn off verbose logging. That may help your CPU usage too.
ok.
Not likely. A broken alias i
Покотиленко Костик put forth on 10/27/2010 7:20 AM:
> Can somebody comment on this please.
>
> В Вто, 26/10/2010 в 18:20 +0300, Покотиленко Костик пишет:
>> I'm now trying to move all RBL and RHSBL checks to policyd-weight. In
>> policyd-weight I set "$ADD_X_HEADER = 1" and very high score so it n
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:11 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
> sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several years and
> are not willing to delist b/c sorbs doesn't offer free delist for them.
>
That is complete FUD, yes, I know what their website says, but knowing
the people
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:00 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:11 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
>
>
>
> > sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several years and
> > are not willing to delist b/c sorbs doesn't offer free delist for them.
> >
>
>
> That
Hi,
sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several
years and
are not willing to delist b/c sorbs doesn't offer free delist for
them.
So there is problem with false-positives. There are not much of them,
but all cases needs additional investigation.
I removed several
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 22:15 -0400, John Peach wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:00 +1000
> Noel Butler wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:11 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several years and
> > > are not willing to
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 21:48 -0500, Al Zick wrote:
> > internal mail which is only imap would be
> >
> >
> > require ["fileinto"];
> > if header :contains "X-Spam-Status" ["Yes,"] {
> > fileinto "Junk";
> > stop;
> > }
>
>
>
> I have found 2 packages:
> dovecot-sieve
> libsieve
>
>
> Could y
On 10/27/2010 7:02 PM, Al Zick wrote:
Is there a replacement for procmail? I know it seemed to take
longer and did raise cpu usage, but when I first installed it
with bogofilter, it almost eliminated spam getting into my inbox.
depends on why you're using procmail... If you need a way to
inte
42 matches
Mail list logo
