Jos Chrispijn put forth on 9/19/2010 11:11 AM:
> I have this email client that takes care of distrubition of email to
> different mail folders.
> As I now started to read my email with a mobile phone, there is a load
> of messages that aren't sorted, as my 'home client' hasn't taken care of
> that
Hi,
I want to know how we can increase the maximum number of concurrent
connections.
So please tell me at what extent I can increase value and where it is
stored?
--
Incase of any further queries, Please feel free to mail me or contact me on
the numbers provided below.
Thanks & Regards,
Avinas
Zitat von Avinash Pawar // Viva :
Hi,
I want to know how we can increase the maximum number of concurrent
connections.
So please tell me at what extent I can increase value and where it is
stored?
Have a look for "default_process_limit"
(http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#default_proce
Hi All,
Not really Postfix related, but maybe you can share your thoughts...
Received a mail today from a user that sent a e-mail which immediately
bounced..
The bounce message said:
host bla.bla.bla[xxx.xxx.xxx] said: 550-SPF check SOFT fail. Your are not
allowed to send mail from 550 ou
On Monday 20 September 2010 14:18:16 Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL wrote:
>
> Not really Postfix related, but maybe you can share your thoughts...
Definitely not Postfix related.
> As far as I understand from the whole SPF perspective, shouldn't a Soft
> Fail be a 4** error and re-try,
So
On 09/20/2010 09:29 AM, Simon Waters wrote:
> On Monday 20 September 2010 14:18:16 Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL wrote:
>>
>> Not really Postfix related, but maybe you can share your thoughts...
>
> Definitely not Postfix related.
>
>> As far as I understand from the whole SPF perspective, s
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 18:11 +0200, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
>
>> I have this email client that takes care of distrubition of email to
>> different mail folders.
>> As I now started to read my email with a mobile phone, there is a load
>> of messages that aren't sorted,
On 19.09.2010 02:30, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
But here is what I do:
transport_maps = destination_for_each_domain
relay_recipient_maps = list_of_valid_recipients
lots_of_tests, reject_unauth_destination, reject_unlisted_recipient,
lots_of_other_tests, reject_unverified_recipient, permit
On 20-9-2010 9:11, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I was in a similar situation not long ago using TBird rules to do my
message sorting into IMAP folders. When accessing my mail vi my
Roundcube webmail server nothing was sorted. I grew tired of this. I
was already using Dovecot for my IMAP server, so I con
Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
E.g., can it be sure to fsync the mbox/Maildir file and/or directory
before it acknowledges successful receipt of an email?
--
Yang Zhang
http://yz.mit.edu/
Yang Zhang:
> Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
This is required by internet mail RFC and therefore not configurable.
Wietse
> E.g., can it be sure to fsync the mbox/Maildir file and/or directory
> before it acknowledges successful receipt of an email?
On 09/20/2010 08:37 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
E.g., can it be sure to fsync the mbox/Maildir file and/or directory
No, but it does guarantee durability from the receiving SMTP session to
the delivering process.
This CAN be deliver
Ok, let me do this another way, since I'm clearly not understanding
how this is suppose to work. I read:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#virtual
Am I understanding this correctly? If I put
addr...@virtual_domain m...@gmail.com
Shouldn't it simply forward email from the fir
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 09/20/2010 08:37 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
>>
>> Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
>>
>> E.g., can it be sure to fsync the mbox/Maildir file and/or directory
>>
>
> No, but it does guarantee durability from the re
Can you pinpoint the exact RFC & section you're referring to? Thanks.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Yang Zhang:
>> Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
>
> This is required by internet mail RFC and therefore not configurable.
>
> Wietse
>
Yang Zhang:
> Just to be clear, if I have this Maildir in my mailbox postmap:
>
> j...@mydomain.com joe/
>
> and most other settings are the Ubuntu 10.04 postfix defaults, then
> postfix will have done an fsync by the time the "250 OK: queued as
> 12345" comes back, such that if I then immediat
Yang Zhang:
> Can you pinpoint the exact RFC & section you're referring to? Thanks.
I will give you as home work to study the following documents:
RFC 821
RFC 2821
RFC 5321
These have lots of other good stuff about Internet mail.
Wietse
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Wietse Venema
Hello,
I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by
following this link:
https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html
It seems to be working OK. The only thing is that when I view my logs, I see
a lot of 'relaying denied', 'noqueue reject', 'too many errors aft
On 9/20/2010 4:29 PM, bper wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by
> following this link:
> https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html
>
> It seems to be working OK. The only thing is that when I view my logs, I see
> a lot of 'rela
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Yang Zhang:
>> Can you pinpoint the exact RFC & section you're referring to? Thanks.
>
> I will give you as home work to study the following documents:
>
> RFC 821
> RFC 2821
> RFC 5321
>
> These have lots of other good stuff about Internet
bper put forth on 9/20/2010 3:29 PM:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by
> following this link:
> https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html
>
> It seems to be working OK. The only thing is that when I view my logs, I see
> a lot of 'r
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Yang Zhang:
>> Just to be clear, if I have this Maildir in my mailbox postmap:
>>
>> j...@mydomain.com joe/
>>
>> and most other settings are the Ubuntu 10.04 postfix defaults, then
>> postfix will have done an fsync by the time the "250 O
On 9/20/2010 3:29 PM, bper wrote:
Hello,
I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by
following this link:
https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html
It seems to be working OK. The only thing is that when I view my logs, I see
a lot of 'relaying denied', 'n
* Yang Zhang :
> > No. Postfix replies "250 OK: queued as 12345" when the message is QUEUED.
>
> Doesn't this contradict your original reply that durability is
> guaranteed? If there's no fsync, then the message may not have been
> persisted to non-volatile storage, and will be lost.
After the m
Yang Zhang put forth on 9/20/2010 3:46 PM:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Yang Zhang:
>>> Can you pinpoint the exact RFC & section you're referring to? Thanks.
>>
>> I will give you as home work to study the following documents:
>>
>> RFC 821
>> RFC 2821
>> RFC 5321
>>
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Yang Zhang :
>
> > > No. Postfix replies "250 OK: queued as 12345" when the message is QUEUED.
> >
> > Doesn't this contradict your original reply that durability is
> > guaranteed? If there's no fsync, then the message may not have been
> > persisted to non-volatile storage
In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop
destination of a message like this:
customer.domain smtp:[mail.customer.domain]
...and the customer uses round robin dns for mail.customer.domain so that it
points to multiple IPs like this:
mail.customer.domain. 900 IN A
On 09/21/2010 12:07 AM, Curtis wrote:
In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop
destination of a message like this:
customer.domain smtp:[mail.customer.domain]
...and the customer uses round robin dns for mail.customer.domain so
that it points to multiple IPs like thi
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:10:49AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 09/21/2010 12:07 AM, Curtis wrote:
>> In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop
>> destination of a message like this:
>>
>> customer.domain smtp:[mail.customer.domain]
>>
>> ...and the customer uses rou
On 09/21/2010 12:52 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:10:49AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/21/2010 12:07 AM, Curtis wrote:
In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop
destination of a message like this:
customer.domain smtp:[mail.cust
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:56:14AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> Yes, when traffic to the destination is light (message deliveries
>> are spaced multiple seconds or more apart) or is very heavy (message
>> deliveries are many in each interval equal to the delivery of a single
>> message). When t
Victor Duchovni put forth on 9/20/2010 6:01 PM:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:56:14AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>
>>> Yes, when traffic to the destination is light (message deliveries
>>> are spaced multiple seconds or more apart) or is very heavy (message
>>> deliveries are many in each interva
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 09/21/2010 12:07 AM, Curtis wrote:
>
>> In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop
>> destination of a message like this:
>>
>> customer.domain smtp:[mail.customer.domain]
>>
>> ...and the customer uses round robi
Le 20/09/2010 22:46, Yang Zhang a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Yang Zhang:
Can you pinpoint the exact RFC& section you're referring to? Thanks.
I will give you as home work to study the following documents:
RFC 821
RFC 2821
RFC 5321
These have lots of oth
Le 20/09/2010 21:15, Yang Zhang a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/20/2010 08:37 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
Can postfix be configured to guarantee durable email receipt?
E.g., can it be sure to fsync the mbox/Maildir file and/or directory
No, but it does gua
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:15:37PM -0400, Brian Pribis wrote:
> If I put
>
> addr...@virtual_domain m...@gmail.com
>
> Shouldn't it simply forward email from the first address to my gmail account?
Yes.
> What happens is the mail does go to gmail but if I hit "reply" it
> tries to mail ba
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:56:35 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> On 9/20/2010 3:29 PM, bper wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have set up a postfix-dovecot server with smtp-auth using sasl by
>> following this link:
>> https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html
>>
>> It seems to be working OK. The
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 9/10/2010 00:32, Nick Edwards wrote:
> > Good day all,
> > I apologize in advance if the moderators consider this slightly OT.
> >
> > We have many users moved to a MySQL database, planned for moving away
> > from Cyrus on Sunday Oct 3, w
38 matches
Mail list logo
