On 09/20/2010 09:29 AM, Simon Waters wrote: > On Monday 20 September 2010 14:18:16 Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL wrote: >> >> Not really Postfix related, but maybe you can share your thoughts... > > Definitely not Postfix related. > >> As far as I understand from the whole SPF perspective, shouldn't a Soft >> Fail be a 4** error and re-try, > > Softfail introduces ambiguity as to whether an email is forged or not and > then > leaves the decision to the receiving server, so one shouldn't be surprised in > this spam rich world if they choose to reject it.
If you're going to try to contact the recipient, this might help: http://www.openspf.org/RFC_4408#op-result-softfail but I would probably just fix the SPF record.
