В Птн, 11/06/2010 в 17:48 -0400, Sahil Tandon пишет:
> You mention that /etc/postfix/recipients_access is empty, but why then
> do you keep it in smtpd_recipient_restrictions? And although the flat
> file is empty, did you postmap it to rebuild the hash (.db file) as
> well?
> Actually, before go
В Суб, 12/06/2010 в 20:27 -0500, Stan Hoeppner пишет:
> Покотиленко Костик put forth on 6/11/2010 2:24 PM:
>
> > This client name unmungled:
> >
> > smtp.harddriveme.com [111.67.206.181]
>
> This should have been caught by one of the two SORBS lists you said you added
> per my advice. SORBS has
Am 13.06.2010, 20:03 Uhr, schrieb JC Putter:
hi everyone,
i have a postfix (2.3.3) server running with fetchmail to retrieve mail
from
the actual mailserver, the problem is that only the office users get
their
my from the local postfix/fetchmail server, the remote users connect to
the
ac
Am 14.06.2010, 10:07 Uhr, schrieb JC Putter:
(about: User unknown in local recipient maps)
as the log show that a person is trying to email a user that does not
have a local account on the postfix server, (the users does have an
account on the mx host) id like postfix to try and deliver to
(To be fair, J C Potter provided a pastebin snippet with postconf -n, and
the smtpd reject log line, but I'm not forwarding those to the list so as
not to breach privacy.)
--
Matthias Andree
Dear Wietse,
Please find below and in attachment the necessary information.
On 06/11/2010 03:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
I'll consider looking into this after I see one posting with:
- postconf -n output.
Please see attachment
- Configuration parameters (-o name=value) in master.cf.
Plea
Am 11.06.2010 19:49, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
On 06/11/2010 11:00 AM, Joern Merkel wrote:
Hi,
I need to forward a single user to another smtp-relay. The rest of the
users of this domain is delivered local. So I put her into
/etc/postfix/transport:
u...@testdomain.de smtp:[212.6.xxx.xxx]
Where
On 6/14/2010 2:46 AM, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
Also can somebody state that my postfix version (Debian say its
2.5.5-1.1) doesn't have postmaster hardcoded internal checks? It seems
like it have, because there is no postmaster accepting rule in my
configuration:
/etc/postfix # grep -R postmaste
hi list, my question is this, i have a server working fine with virtual
users and domains but i want to encrypted the password that appear in file
that have information about a lookup table, i mean i have a file called
mysql_mailbox_domain.conf and inside i have user = hosts = password = etc
etc
Rudy Gevaert:
> This is my test email:
>
> rgeva...@pimp:~$ telnet smtp1.ugent.be 25
> Trying 157.193.71.182...
> Connected to smtp1.ugent.be.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 smtp.ugent.be ESMTP Postfix (Debian/GNU)
> helo pimp.ugent.be
> 250 smtp1.UGent.be
> mail from:
> 250 2.1.0 Ok
> rcpt to:
On 06/10/2010 05:09 PM, Mike Hutchinson wrote:
yahoo_destination_concurrency_limit = 4
yahoo_destination_rate_delay = 1s
Well, we do that already (concurrency = 2, rate_delay = 2s). It's still
slow. Do you use multiple outbound email gateways?
Maybe I should try to increase our existing para
Florin Andrei:
> P.S.: We're using postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2 that comes with Red Hat 5. I'm
That is two Postfix versions before _rate_delay was introduced.
You may want to upgrade to Postfix 2.5 or later.
If you can throttle down Postfix so it never hits Yahoo's limits,
then it will always be bet
hi list, my question is this, i have a server working fine with
virtual users and domains but i want to encrypted the password that
appear in file that have information about a lookup table, i mean i
have a file called mysql_mailbox_domain.conf and inside i have user =
hosts = password = etc
Thanks for the help Wietse, however don't seem to be able to produce
what you are saying.
Quoting "Wietse Venema" :
To fix, you need to update the local_header_rewrite_clients in your
main.cf file and specify network/mask information that includes
all the networks whose headers you want to re
Hi J, thanks for answer, yes i have the mysql_mailbox_domains.conf file
with root as a user and postfix as a group and the permissions is
-rw-r- root have read and write and postfix read, is this ok?,
so,
you said that i dont would have to use mailscanner, which one you use
??
thanks,
On M
On 06/14/2010 11:13 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Florin Andrei:
P.S.: We're using postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2 that comes with Red Hat 5. I'm
That is two Postfix versions before _rate_delay was introduced.
You may want to upgrade to Postfix 2.5 or later.
Aw great. :( Sometimes Red Hat's conservative
Rudy Gevaert:
> However:
>
> local_header_rewrite_clients = static:all
>
> rewrites envelop but not the header, reading the docs I would assume
> it should rewrite the From header:
It will not, because you have
receive_override_options = no_address_mappings
in your main.cf file.
Thank you for your help Wietse!
Quoting "Wietse Venema" :
It will not, because you have
receive_override_options = no_address_mappings
This of course explains it! I now figure that I need to put, several
times) the correct local_header_rewrite_clients into my master.cf ?
For the time
Hi Eero, what is the diference between amavisd-new and MailScanner,
thanks
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:00:59 +0300, Eero Volotinen
wrote:
>
2010/6/14 Guillermo Botero :
>> Hi J, thanks for answer, yes i have the
mysql_mailbox_domains.conf file
>> with
>> root as a user and postfix as a
group and the
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:30:43 -0500
Guillermo Botero articulated:
> Hi Eero, what is the diference between amavisd-new and MailScanner,
> thanks
>
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:00:59 +0300, Eero Volotinen
> wrote:
> >
> 2010/6/14 Guillermo Botero :
> >> Hi J, thanks for answer, yes i have the
> mysql
Rudy Gevaert:
> Thank you for your help Wietse!
>
> Quoting "Wietse Venema" :
>
> > It will not, because you have
> >
> > receive_override_options = no_address_mappings
>
> This of course explains it! I now figure that I need to put, several
> times) the correct local_header_rewrite_clien
Hello
From The Book of Postfix:
"If you do not set myorigin manually, it will default to myhostname, which
comes in handy if you run various hosts whose root messages should be delivered
to one role account at a central server. This way you will always know the
hostname the message came from;
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 22:32:58 +0200, Matias E. Fernandez wrote:
> I have the following settings:
> myorigin = host.example.com
> mydestination =
> # relay to mx
> relayhost = example.com
> inet_interfaces = loopback-only
> local_transport = error:local delivery is disabled
>
> Due to the relayh
Matias E. Fernandez:
> What I'm trying to achieve is exactly that. I want that this message:
>
> echo "root alias set" | /usr/sbin/sendmail -f root root
>
> sent from host.example.com be sent to the central mail server at
> mx1.example.com and delivered to root.
>
> I have the following setting
Hello Sahil
Thank you for your suggestion!
On 2010-06-15, at 02:26, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Configure mx1.example.org to believe it is the final destination for
> host.example.com.
This exactly what I want to avoid because it would involve amending
the configuration on the central mail server eac
Hello Wietse
On 2010-06-15, at 02:48, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Weird, but possible.
I fear that the author of a software finding my config for said software
"weird, but possible" is not a good sign. :-)
What part of it do find weird, and why?
I don't want host.example.com to handle any mail, tha
26 matches
Mail list logo
