Manao ahoana, Hello, Bonjour,
We have an autoreply configuration very close to these:
http://screamingelectron.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2523
http://arunnsblog.com/2009/10/28/auto-responder-with-postfixvirtualautoreply-pl/
which is about this line into master.cf:
autoreply unix - n n - - pipe
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:06:59 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> On 4/22/2010 6:17 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
>> Well what I'm after is the following:
>>
>> Postfix should be nice and locked, no relaying or anything like that;
>> backup_max's should be allowed to relay of course, and users who have
>> logg
I know there're a lot of postfix stats programs, but how can I get
ONLY, the total number of email sent by postfix except for a couple of
local domains? Can you help me?
thanks for your time
--
Regards;
Israel Garcia
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:44 +0200, Israel Garcia wrote:
> I know there're a lot of postfix stats programs, but how can I get
> ONLY, the total number of email sent by postfix except for a couple of
> local domains? Can you help me?
awk does it.
Tõnu
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Tonu Samuel wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:44 +0200, Israel Garcia wrote:
>> I know there're a lot of postfix stats programs, but how can I get
>> ONLY, the total number of email sent by postfix except for a couple of
>> local domains? Can you help me?
>
> awk d
On 4/23/2010 6:10 AM, oliver wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:06:59 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
On 4/22/2010 6:17 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
Here's what I have in my postconf now:
mydomain = example.com
myhostname = foo.example.com
mynetworks_style = host
OK, you're not defining mynetworks, permit_
HI ,
I am well aware that postfix plays no part in the process I describe below, I
merely wanted to know if the mailbox_command would play a part in it. That is
why I gave you a little background (like normal) before I asked about the
mailbox_command. Do not asume that all first-time posters are i
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:50 +0200, Israel Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Tonu Samuel wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:44 +0200, Israel Garcia wrote:
> >> I know there're a lot of postfix stats programs, but how can I get
> >> ONLY, the total number of email sent by postfix exc
Danny:
> HI ,
>
> I am well aware that postfix plays no part in the process I describe below, I
> merely wanted to know if the mailbox_command would play a part in it. That is
> why I gave you a little background (like normal) before I asked about the
> mailbox_command. Do not asume that all first
Thanks tonu, working now!..
regards
Israel.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Tonu Samuel wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:50 +0200, Israel Garcia wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Tonu Samuel wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:44 +0200, Israel Garcia wrote:
>> >> I know there're a l
Just continuing
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System
-
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: postmaster
Delivered-To: p
The Doctor:
>
> Just continuing
>
> - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System
> -
>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
> version=3.3.1
> X-Origina
When ThunderBird forwards a message, it sends it with the ORIGINAL Date header:
This hits one of my header_checks for spammy mails:
/^Date:.* 200[0-8]/REJECT Your email has a date
from the past. Fix your system clock and try again.
Apr 23 09:18:26 mail postfix/clean
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:38:36AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> When ThunderBird forwards a message, it sends it with the ORIGINAL Date
> header:
>
> This hits one of my header_checks for spammy mails:
>
> /^Date:.* 200[0-8]/REJECT Your email has a date
> from the past.
Mihamina Rakotomandimby a écrit :
> Manao ahoana, Hello, Bonjour,
>
> We have an autoreply configuration very close to these:
> http://screamingelectron.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2523
> http://arunnsblog.com/2009/10/28/auto-responder-with-postfixvirtualautoreply-pl/
> which is about this line int
Hi Wietse,
No, it is not too much to ask. I and MANY other people have been supporting open
source for a VERY VERY long time. We, in our own little way, have spread the
open-source gospel to just as many people. We contribute where we can, maybe not
in an "important" way like designing a mailserve
Quoting Danny :
POSTFIX calls fetchamail in the postfix main.cf
via the mailbox_command. SO DO NOT TELL ME THAT I AM ON THE WRONG FREAKIN
MAILING LIST.
Did Wietse tell you you were on the wrong mailing list? He simply
asked for logs showing Postfix was actually part of your problem.
You n
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 07:59:17PM +0200, Danny wrote:
> So do not tell me that I am on the wrong [...] mailing list.
Hopefully, we can down-case this thread and avoid "them fighting words".
We don't know you. Most questions asked on this list are asked by people
who "do not know how to ask". Sp
Danny:
> Hi Wietse,
>
> No, it is not too much to ask. I and MANY other people have been
> supporting open source for a VERY VERY long time. We, in our own
Then, your next step is to produce logfile evidence that confirms
that Postfix is actually part of the problem.
There is no need to reply wi
On 23-Apr-2010, at 09:47, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:38:36AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> When ThunderBird forwards a message, it sends it with the ORIGINAL Date
>> header:
>>
>> This hits one of my header_checks for spammy mails:
>>
>> /^Date:.* 200[0-8]/
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:37:01AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> > Blocking old dates is unlikely to be a very effective anti-spam measure.
> > I would advise that you turn this filter off.
>
> I've turned it off for now. Certainly blocking FUTURE dates has been
> effective in the past.
Yes, blocking
Dave Shariff Yadallee - System Administrator a.k.a. The Root of the Problem:
> > > In: DATA
> > > Out: 354 End data with .
> > > Out: 451 4.3.0 Error: queue file write error
> > >
> > > Session aborted, reason: lost connection
> > >
> > > For other details, see the local mail logfile
> > >
This is probably a dumb question; however, I was wondering if Postfix
works with gsasl or only Cyrus. I ask because I recently saw a question
regarding this on another forum.
--
Jerry
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIB
Reply-To: /dev/null :: EOT for me.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:16:31PM +0200, Danny wrote the first of a
series of rants, none worthy of quoting here.
I suggest you go back and reread my helpful reply. It contained some
useful advice and simple instructions for how to get real help with
the pro
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 03:55:19PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> This is probably a dumb question; however, I was wondering if Postfix
> works with gsasl or only Cyrus. I ask because I recently saw a question
> regarding this on another forum.
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
--
Vikt
And you do not inspire much confidence in the IT industry if you think your
answer was helpfull. My personal advice to you ... get away from your screen
every now and then ... there is a real life if you just open your front door.
>On Apr 23 10, /dev/rob0 :
>
> PS: Danny does not inspire much con
Danny:
> And you do not inspire much confidence in the IT industry if you think your
> answer was helpfull. My personal advice to you ... get away from your screen
> every now and then ... there is a real life if you just open your front door.
Danny, when are you going to provide the logfile evide
On 2010-04-24 Danny wrote:
> And you do not inspire much confidence in the IT industry if you think
> your answer was helpfull. My personal advice to you ... get away from
> your screen every now and then ... there is a real life if you just
> open your front door.
>
>>On Apr 23 10, /dev/rob0 :
>>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:02:30PM -0700, brian moore wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:38:06 -0600
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>
> > Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
> > In: mail-iw0-f172.google.com
> > Out: 402 4.5.2 Error: command not recognized
>
> is not a vali
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> > Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
I know this (probably) has little bearing on the problem at hand, but
if I used experimental snapshot releases in a customer-facing setting
I'd be booted out the door.
Likewise, if I
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:01:05AM -0400, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> >> > ??Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
>
> I know this (probably) has little bearing on the problem at hand, but
> if I used experimental snapshot release
31 matches
Mail list logo
