2010/2/23 ram :
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 16:48 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> 2010/2/22 ram :
>> > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:17 -0500, Carlos Williams wrote:
>> >
>> > Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
>> > to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is
On 23 February 2010 19:34, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/2/23 ram :
>> All the files which I used for my compile are here
>>
>> https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/postfix-2.7.0.rpmfiles.tgz
>>
>> You may want to hash-off the dotname patch which I use on my machines
>>
>> Of course take care of the usual
If someone can help me with a doc on creating a ".src.rpm" package I
would like to try it
Thanks
Ram
actually,when you're follow workaround on my site you got both binary
and source.
usually located at %_topdir/SRPMS/
spec files always produces both binary and source when rebuild with
* ram [23/02/2010 09:01] :
>
> If someone can help me with a doc on creating a ".src.rpm" package I
> would like to try it
I've always found Guru Labs' guide to be helpful:
http://www.gurulabs.com/downloads/GURULABS-RPM-LAB/GURULABS-RPM-GUIDE-v1.0.PDF
Emmanuel
brian moore put forth on 2/22/2010 12:57 PM:
> I like Spamhaus, and it is very effective, though they do charge a
> nontrivial fee for commercial usage that would never get approved around here.
You may be pleasantly surprised to find out you do qualify for free use.
http://www.spamhaus.org/orga
Hello,
While moving the IMAP services to a new host, I'd need to copy all messages
addressed to anyu...@example.com to the old inbox, and to the new at
anyu...@tempsubdomain.example.com
Virtual maps allows this, but needs the full list in the form
us...@example.com: user1 us...@tempdomain.example.
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 13:23 +0200, Razvan Cosma wrote:
> Hello,
> While moving the IMAP services to a new host, I'd need to copy all
> messages addressed to anyu...@example.com to the old inbox, and to the
> new at anyu...@tempsubdomain.example.com
> Virtual maps allows this, but needs the full li
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 13:23 +0200, Razvan Cosma wrote:
> Hello,
> While moving the IMAP services to a new host, I'd need to copy all
> messages addressed to anyu...@example.com to the old inbox, and to the
> new at anyu...@tempsubdomain.example.com
> Virtual maps allows this, but needs the full
Hi Wietse,
Yes you are correct. My browser was not showing those headers.
Thanks for the prompt reply.
Regards,
Shameem
--- On Tue, 23/2/10, Wietse Venema wrote:
> From: Wietse Venema
> Subject: Re: Add extra headers when forwarding
> To: "Postfix users"
> Date: Tuesday, 23 February, 2010
Hello,
I'm enhancing a program I use to follow Postfix logs in sort of real-time. It
does a couple of things, and the most important is to record a single-line
summaries for each message, storing source IP address, from, to, timestamp,
size, final delivery destination (mail relay or mailbox) a
ram:
>
> On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 13:23 +0200, Razvan Cosma wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > While moving the IMAP services to a new host, I'd need to copy all
> > messages addressed to anyu...@example.com to the old inbox, and to the
> > new at anyu...@tempsubdomain.example.com
> > Virtual maps allows this
Hi,
I'm using postfix as mail server and I'm very satisfied about how it
works
I've to implement a service that sends lists of mails including commercial
offers (and no spam obviously)...
the problem is that sometimes some Internet providers recognize servers that
sends too much mail and can ba
Borja Marcos:
> Is there, maybe, a guarantee (due to the program flow in smtpd)
> that the "message-id=" line from cleanup will always be logged
> before the "disconnected" line from smtpd?
When an SMTP client aborts prematurely, then the Postfix smtpd
process will immediately log the "disconnect
Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:54:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
The rules for display names are in RFC*22. Look for the ABNF for
display-name, phrase, word, and atom.
Short answer: as long as =?iso-8859-1?Q?stuff?= looks like an
RFC2822 atom, it needs no quoting.
> So the first one is correct and the second one not??
>
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=F6fler=2C_Verena?=
> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=27=22H=F6fler=2C_Martin=22=27?=
>
> This was within one mail from Outlook/Exchange and at least
> Thunderbird badly chokes on the first one when answering
Same here. T
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:23:08PM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote:
> I'm enhancing a program I use to follow Postfix logs in sort of
> real-time. It does a couple of things, and the most important is to
> record a single-line summaries for each message, storing source IP
> address, from, to, timestam
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
>
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:54:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> >> The rules for display names are in RFC*22. Look for the ABNF for
> >> display-name, phrase, word, and atom.
> >>
> >> Short answer: as long as =?iso-8859-1?Q?stuff?= lo
/dev/rob0:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:23:08PM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote:
> > I'm enhancing a program I use to follow Postfix logs in sort of
> > real-time. It does a couple of things, and the most important is to
> > record a single-line summaries for each message, storing source IP
> > addres
Hello,
just a suggestion. Below is an example how freshly started 3 Postfix
instances looks in process list (I'm not posting ps from working system to
not bloat this message):
18374 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/lib/postfix/master
18377 ?S 0:00 \_ pickup -l -t fifo -u -c -o content_filt
By default, Postfix multi-instance support logs each instance with
its own name (using the syslog_name main.cf parameter).
For example, to find out which instances exist and what their master
PIDs are, use:
# postfix status
This will log information about each instance, with its own name
Ch
Hello
If I use the command
# mail -v n...@domain.com I get the folloing
Mail delivery status report will be mailed to
But then I get MAILER-DAEMON (mail transport unavailable)
Using FreeBSD 7.2
Postfix 2.6.5
And second instance running
Thanks in advance
_ Motty
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:52:23AM -0800, motty cruz wrote:
> If I use the command
> # mail -v n...@domain.com I get the folloing
> Mail delivery status report will be mailed to
> But then I get MAILER-DAEMON (mail transport unavailable)
>
> Using FreeBSD 7.2
> Postfix 2.6.5
> And second insta
Thanks for pointing that out Victor, does not justify that I'm newbie,
please accept my apologies.
I'm in the command prompt of the spam filter I finished building using
FreeBSD 7.2 and Postfix 2.6.5 and I want to send email to myself
mo...@domain.com so I type the following in the command prompt
Wietse Venema put forth on 2/23/2010 10:39 AM:
> Not all the world
> is Linux. In fact there are 10 times as many Macs.
Wietse Venema put forth on 2/16/2010 10:01 AM:
> This is a technical mailing list. When you claim that something is
> bad, you need to support that claim with actual evidence. O
AMP Admin:
> is there away to stop prepend: header from being added to the logs?
No. If it bothers you, use grep.
Wietse
-
It just sucks when logwatch sends me the logs and it's an email with over
1000 lines of header prepend info.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:17:35AM -0800, motty cruz wrote:
> Filter # mail -v mo...@domain.com
> Subject: test postfix conf
> debug_peer_list = 127.0.0.1
>
> .
> EOT
> Mail Delivery Status Report will be mailed to .
> Filter # mailq
> -Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient--
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:26:23AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Wietse Venema put forth on 2/23/2010 10:39 AM:
>
> > Not all the world
> > is Linux. In fact there are 10 times as many Macs.
>
> Wietse Venema put forth on 2/16/2010 10:01 AM:
> > This is a technical mailing list. When you claim t
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:47:09 -0600
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/dnsblusage.html
>
> *Definition: "non-commercial use" is use for any purpose other than as part
> or all of a product or service that is resold, or for use of which a fee is
> charged. For example, usi
Stan Hoeppner:
> Wietse Venema put forth on 2/23/2010 10:39 AM:
>
> > Not all the world
> > is Linux. In fact there are 10 times as many Macs.
>
> Wietse Venema put forth on 2/16/2010 10:01 AM:
> > This is a technical mailing list. When you claim that something is
> > bad, you need to support tha
On 2/23/2010 11:34 AM, AMP Admin wrote:
AMP Admin:
is there away to stop prepend: header from being added to the logs?
No. If it bothers you, use grep.
Wietse
-
It just sucks when logwatch sends me the logs and it's an email with over
1000 lines of header prepend info.
Adjust
On 2/23/2010 11:34 AM, AMP Admin wrote:
> AMP Admin:
>> is there away to stop prepend: header from being added to the logs?
>
> No. If it bothers you, use grep.
>
> Wietse
> -
>
> It just sucks when logwatch sends me the logs and it's an email with over
> 1000 lines of header prepend in
AMP Admin wrote:
On 2/23/2010 11:34 AM, AMP Admin wrote:
AMP Admin:
is there away to stop prepend: header from being added to the logs?
No. If it bothers you, use grep.
Wietse
-
It just sucks when logwatch sends me the logs and it's an email with over
1000 lines of header prepen
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:40:47AM -0800, brian moore wrote:
> Strip out the commas to make the sentence simpler:
> Use of the Spamhaus DNSBLs by organizations and networks ... or
> by ISPs ... requires a subscription to the Spamhaus DNSBL
> Datafeed Service...
>
> When Spamhaus switched t
Please do not top-post your replies. Thank you.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:17:35AM -0800, motty cruz wrote:
> FreeBSD 7.2 and Postfix 2.6.5 and I want to send email to myself
> mo...@domain.com
Please use example.com for examples. Example.TLD is reserved for
examples in every top-level domain. Ho
Wietse Venema put forth on 2/23/2010 11:41 AM:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> Wietse Venema put forth on 2/23/2010 10:39 AM:
>>
>>> Not all the world
>>> is Linux. In fact there are 10 times as many Macs.
>>
>> Wietse Venema put forth on 2/16/2010 10:01 AM:
>>> This is a technical mailing list. When you claim
On Feb 23, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Stan Hoeppner
wrote:
Wietse Venema put forth on 2/23/2010 11:41 AM:
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 2/23/2010 10:39 AM:
Not all the world
is Linux. In fact there are 10 times as many Macs.
Wietse Venema put forth on 2/16/2010 10:01 AM:
This is a t
Thank you,
I apologize for mistakes it was my first time posting my problems with
postfix,
The issue was resolved, I deleted
local_transport = no local transport available
in /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf
as Victor point out in his response below.
I appreciated your help!,
Thanks,
_ Motty
I want to deploy my actualy postfix+amavisd-new sistem with SSL/TLS with
certificates.Is necessary to modify in amavisd-new config file for SSL?
Sahil Tandon put forth on 2/23/2010 12:53 PM:
> Stan can you take this pedantic nitpicking off-list if you must
> persist? Thanks.
No need to go off-list. This poor dead horse has been beaten enough, I
think. Sorry to have been in pedant mode.
/~$ /usr/bin/wishful_commands/pedant off
--
Sta
Hi,
I installed postfix on a machine, which has been configured as a mail relay
server.
I want it to do 2 things:
A. accept requests from only trusted SMTP clients
B. accept requests that are addressed to domain2.net
Point A is achieved by adding the following to /etc/postfix/main.cf:
mynetworks
Zitat von Gaby L :
I want to deploy my actualy postfix+amavisd-new sistem with SSL/TLS
with certificates.Is necessary to modify in amavisd-new config file
for SSL?
For normal usage not. The TLS/SSL endpoints are the SMTP
server/clients, so it is only a Postfix thing. The only exception
On 2/23/2010 1:03 PM, Gaby L wrote:
I want to deploy my actualy postfix+amavisd-new sistem with SSL/TLS with
certificates.Is necessary to modify in amavisd-new config file for SSL?
Typically amavisd-new and postfix are run on the same server
and the connection is over localhost. In this case,
On 2/23/2010 1:54 PM, Yungwei Chen wrote:
Hi,
I installed postfix on a machine, which has been configured as a mail
relay server.
I want it to do 2 things:
A. accept requests from only trusted SMTP clients
B. accept requests that are addressed to domain2.net
Point A is achieved by adding the
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 17:39, Wietse Venema wrote:
> By default, Postfix multi-instance support logs each instance with
> its own name (using the syslog_name main.cf parameter).
>
> For example, to find out which instances exist and what their master
> PIDs are, use:
>
> # postfix status
>
> T
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:15:59PM +0100, Andrzej Kuku??a wrote:
> Thanks, I just didn't know it's platform specific... I thought of
> master(8) command line arguments that are displayed but ignored -- but
> it's not really THAT important.
The master(8) daemon changing its argument vector is not
Can someone confirm what Noel said? Any workaround?
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Noel Jones
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 2:16 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: A problem related to smtpd_reci
* Noel Jones :
> Perhaps surprisingly, postfix smtpd_*_restrictions only apply to mail
> submitted via smtp.
Someone should actually start collecting all those frequently used
sayings - and perhaps translate them.
I remember having asked a not-so-clever question here once, and I got
the "Perhaps
On 2/23/2010 1:54 PM, Yungwei Chen wrote:
...
Sending an email to my yahoo email address from a trusted SMTP client is
being rejected as expected.
...
However, doing the same from the mail relay server is not being blocked
as expected.
What am I missing here? Thanks.
-Original Message--
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:52:01 -0500
Yungwei Chen replied:
>Can someone confirm what Noel said? Any workaround?
Why, don't you believe him?
In any case, could you please stop top-posting, as well as the use of
HTML e-mail?
--
Jerry
postfix.u...@yahoo.com
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.post
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 03:47:16PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > So the first one is correct and the second one not??
> >
> > From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=F6fler=2C_Verena?=
> > To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=27=22H=F6fler=2C_Martin=22=27?=
> >
> > This was within one mail from Outlook/Exchange and at lea
What is the most straight method of hooking up a milter for blackhole
services. I've had more than a fewest suggestions and read a few
different methods, but I'm left puzzled as to the best means of doing
this.
Ruben
--
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Interesting Stuff
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadershi
How do I get postfix to reject mails "From" my own domains coming from
outside the local network?
Ruben
--
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Interesting Stuff
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
"> I'm an engineer. I choose the best tool for the job, politics be damned.<
You m
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
> Von: Ruben Safir
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: restricting acceptence of mail users except from local network
> How do I get postfix to reject mails "From" my own domains coming from
> outside the local
On 2/23/2010 6:30 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
What is the most straight method of hooking up a milter for blackhole
services. I've had more than a fewest suggestions and read a few
different methods, but I'm left puzzled as to the best means of doing
this.
Ruben
Generally using an RBL in postfix i
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
> > Von: Ruben Safir
> > An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Betreff: restricting acceptence of mail users except from local network
>
> > How do I get postfix
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:46:18PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/23/2010 6:30 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >What is the most straight method of hooking up a milter for blackhole
> >services. I've had more than a fewest suggestions and read a few
> >different methods, but I'm left puzzled as to the b
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
> > Von: Ruben Safir
> > An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Betreff: restricting acceptence of mail users except from local network
>
> > How do I get postfix
On 2/23/2010 7:27 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:46:18PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/23/2010 6:30 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
What is the most straight method of hooking up a milter for blackhole
services. I've had more than a fewest suggestions and read a few
different methods
On 2/23/2010 7:35 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
Von: Ruben Safir
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: restricting acceptence of mail users except from local network
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:23:11PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/23/2010 7:35 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
> >>
> >> Original-Nachricht
> >>>Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
> >>>Von: Ruben Safir
> >>>An: postfix-users@pos
On 23-Feb-10 17:32, Ruben Safir wrote:
How do I get postfix to reject mails "From" my own domains coming from
outside the local network?
This is a FAQ, and a complicated one.
Are you trying to just block any email that is from u...@yourdomain.tld
and to u...@yourdomain.tld? If so, the easiest
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:32:57PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 23-Feb-10 17:32, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >How do I get postfix to reject mails "From" my own domains coming from
> >outside the local network?
>
> This is a FAQ, and a complicated one.
>
> Are you trying to just block any email that is fr
On 23-Feb-10 20:48, Ruben Safir wrote:
This is getting philophical and I just don't care. Mail From our domain
has to originate from OUR domain. No exceptions.
Then you've already been given the solution by Noel.
--
Bite me, suck me, show me you care
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:52:00PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 23-Feb-10 20:48, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >This is getting philophical and I just don't care. Mail From our domain
> >has to originate from OUR domain. No exceptions.
>
> Then you've already been given the solution by Noel.
>
Thanks
>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:23:11PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/23/2010 7:35 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
> >>
> >> Original-Nachricht
> >>>Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
> >>>Von: Ruben Safir
> >>>An: postfix-users@pos
>
> Anyway to restrict the From: header to the local domain as well as the
> From header
>
> It seems that Majordomo will accept the mail if the From: is different
> than the From
>
> >From mrbrk...@panix.com
>
> From: ru...@mrbrklyn.com
>
> I'd like to reject it at the mail server if either
66 matches
Mail list logo
