Hello,
I have applied the following filters (milters) in my Postfix incoming mail
server:
1. DKIM milter
2. SenderID milter
3. SPF policy.
All three append headers in the received e-mail regarding their checks.
I want to know how much protection do these provide me against spoofing and do
On Oct 26, 2009, at 4:12 AM, "Sharma, Ashish"
wrote:
Hello,
I have applied the following filters (milters) in my Postfix
incoming mail server:
DKIM milter
SenderID milter
SPF policy.
All three append headers in the received e-mail regarding their
checks.
I want to know how much prote
I'm trying out various DNS blacklist items and am calling on the
wisdom here for a little help. For example, if I DNS blacklist
malwaresite.example.com to point to an internal "honeypot"
machine.
When the user goes to http://www dot malwaresite.example.com
site, we have a little web server that
Im using proxymap for an sql recipient check query, however when the file
doesnt have postfix permission - the following error occurs
postfix/proxymap[12724]: fatal: open /etc/mydir/recipient_check
whats weird is, all other config files like postfix_mynetworks
postfix_relaydomains which have th
On Oct 26, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Harakiri wrote:
Im using proxymap for an sql recipient check query, however when the
file doesnt have postfix permission - the following error occurs
postfix/proxymap[12724]: fatal: open /etc/mydir/recipient_check
whats weird is, all other config files like post
Sahil Tandon:
> On Oct 26, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Harakiri wrote:
>
> > Im using proxymap for an sql recipient check query, however when the
> > file doesnt have postfix permission - the following error occurs
> >
> > postfix/proxymap[12724]: fatal: open /etc/mydir/recipient_check
> >
> > whats weir
On 10/26/2009 8:07 AM, rac...@mcs.anl.gov wrote:
I'm trying out various DNS blacklist items and am calling on the
wisdom here for a little help. For example, if I DNS blacklist
malwaresite.example.com to point to an internal "honeypot"
machine.
When the user goes to http://www dot malwaresite.e
--- On Mon, 10/26/09, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> In the section titled SECURITY, there needs to be a note
> that
> proxymap always opens tables with the privileges of the
> "$mail_owner"
> UID and GID.
>
> Wietse
Thanks, is there a particular reason why postfix itself can read config from
On Monday 26 October 2009 16:03:56 Harakiri wrote:
>
> Thanks, is there a particular reason why postfix itself can read config
> from any user like for maps etc - but proxymap cant? The only way i see now
> is to add my user to the group of postfix.
Because proxymap is running as user postfix? Sys
Wietse:
> In the section titled SECURITY, there needs to be a note that
> proxymap always opens tables with the privileges of the "$mail_owner"
> UID and GID.
Harakiri:
> Thanks, is there a particular reason why postfix itself can read
> config from any user like for maps etc - but proxymap cant?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > > [snip]
> >
> >
> > __ Hinweis von ESET NOD32 Antivirus, Signaturdatenbank-
> Version
> > 4539 (20091024) _
Folks,
We are using the goldfish autoresponder within our PostFix install and while
it works fine for individuals it doesn't work well when that person is part
of distribution list.This seems to be a configuration issue though as
there is no reason it should send out an autoresponse for one of
Sorry I didn't update the subject of my earlier post. I do apologise for
the oversight.
William Jordan
IT Manager
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of William Jordan
Sent: October-26-09 11:29 AM
To: postfix-users
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:34:11PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The Postfix LMTP server does not perform final delivery.
That's Postfix LMTP *client* of course. If Postfix had an LMTP server
that deposited mail into a store of some sort, that could indeed be
final delivery. This said, Postfix ha
Victor Duchovni:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:34:11PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > The Postfix LMTP server does not perform final delivery.
>
> That's Postfix LMTP *client* of course. If Postfix had an LMTP server
> that deposited mail into a store of some sort, that could indeed be
> final
I am running ssl+sasl authenticated mailgateway and problem is that in
some cases clients from world are sending mail from "blacklisted" networks.
The main problem is that spamassasin is analyzing received headers and
it might tag message as spam by received by headers.
So, How I can remove h
On Monday, October 26, 2009 at 20:15 CET,
Eero Volotinen wrote:
> I am running ssl+sasl authenticated mailgateway and problem is that
> in some cases clients from world are sending mail from "blacklisted"
> networks.
>
> The main problem is that spamassasin is analyzing received headers
> a
On Monday, October 26, 2009 at 19:32 CET,
William Jordan wrote:
> Sorry I didn't update the subject of my earlier post. I do apologise
> for the oversight.
The problem was not that you didn't replace the Subject header, the
fundamental problem was that you replied to an old message when yo
I am getting ready to remove my Postfix installation of 2.3 which is
the latest version RHEL / CentOS have to offer for stability reasons
in place for the 2.6.5-1 RPM I downloaded from Simon. I have Postgrey,
Amavisd-new, Dovecot, and ClamAV all integrated or interacting with
the Postfix 2.3 MTA pa
Carlos Williams:
> I am getting ready to remove my Postfix installation of 2.3 which is
> the latest version RHEL / CentOS have to offer for stability reasons
> in place for the 2.6.5-1 RPM I downloaded from Simon. I have Postgrey,
> Amavisd-new, Dovecot, and ClamAV all integrated or interacting wi
Yes, header_checks can be used. Howeer, you'd want to avoid doing this
to all email. To affect only messages submitted by your clients, define
two cleanup(8) services (one with these header checks and one without)
and use separate SMTP listener for your SASL clients (which you might
have already
On 10/26/2009 2:15 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
I am running ssl+sasl authenticated mailgateway and problem is that in
some cases clients from world are sending mail from "blacklisted" networks.
The main problem is that spamassasin is analyzing received headers and
it might tag message as spam by r
Folks,
We are using the goldfish autoresponder within our PostFix install. It
sends out an autoresponse when e-mailing the person directly as expected but
also sends the response when e-mailing a distribution list the person is a
member of. So if someone e-mails a distribution list and one of th
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:52:48 -0700
> Von: "William Jordan"
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Autoresponder - distribution list problem
> Folks,
>
> We are using the goldfish autoresponder within our PostFix install. It
> sends out an autoresp
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:25:51PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Daniel Kauffman:
> >multi_instance_wrapper = ${command_directory}/postmulti -p --
>
> This is currently not supported. Ask your money back.
This is a regression from the original implementation, when the
default syslog_name dep
On 24 Oct 2009, at 19:21, Wietse Venema wrote:
Rupert Reid:
On 23 Oct 2009, at 11:48, Wietse Venema wrote:
Rupert Reid:
Delivery Status Notification (Failure) = The following message to
was undeliverable. The reason for the problem:
5.1.2 - Bad destination host 'DNS Hard Error looki
Hi all.
Every day I have a bunch of messages stuck in the active queue because of
address typos made by the sender. Some of them I just let exprire and go
back to the user, but others could be so easily fixed (eg "hotmal.com"
instead of "hotmail.com") that I would like to do that myself.
Is there a
On Monday, October 26, 2009 at 21:48 CET,
Jack Knowlton wrote:
> Every day I have a bunch of messages stuck in the active queue because
> of address typos made by the sender. Some of them I just let exprire
> and go back to the user, but others could be so easily fixed (eg
> "hotmal.com" ins
On Monday, October 26, 2009 at 21:48 CET,
Rupert Reid wrote:
> Thank you for your offer of help. I was able to locate he problem -
> for some inexplicable reason the permissions to /var/mail/user was
> corrupted (exactly what was written on the tin) - meaning that
> postfix could not access
Daniel Spannbauer a écrit :
>
>> bet of the day: something in master.cf overrides your main.cf
>> config
>>
>> show your master.cf.
>
>
> [snip]
your master.cf shows a content_filter, but this doesn't appear in the
last post logs.
you need to check that the postfix that logs the error is t
William Jordan a écrit :
> Folks,
>
> We are using the goldfish autoresponder within our PostFix install. It
> sends out an autoresponse when e-mailing the person directly as expected
> but also sends the response when e-mailing a distribution list the
> person is a member of. So if someone e-ma
Jack Knowlton a écrit :
> Hi all.
> Every day I have a bunch of messages stuck in the active queue because of
> address typos made by the sender. Some of them I just let exprire and go
> back to the user, but others could be so easily fixed (eg "hotmal.com"
> instead of "hotmail.com") that I would
LinkedIn
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Siju
Confirm that you know Siju George
https://www.linkedin.com/e/isd/822151906/TaU6iNvw/
Every day, millions of professionals like Siju George use LinkedIn to connect
with colleagues, find experts, and e
33 matches
Mail list logo
