I have a very simple problem. I have a small /28 network and I want my
postfix host (mose.fekiworld.dk, 87.48.217.12) to relay ALL mail for
all my other machines in this network. However, even if I set
mynetworks right, and I still get 554-rejections like this (from
mail.log):
Mar 21 17:25:50 mose
Hello,
sorry for the trouble i couse but as you may nothice I'm not very
experienced user .
I am really grateful for your help. I DO.
Victor Duchovni pisze:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:35:09PM +0100, Sebastian Chociwski wrote:
>
>> I am (almost ;) ) 100% sure that only mail could be delivered is
2009/3/23 Madeleine Birkemose :
> I have a very simple problem. I have a small /28 network and I want my
> postfix host (mose.fekiworld.dk, 87.48.217.12) to relay ALL mail for
> all my other machines in this network. However, even if I set
> mynetworks right, and I still get 554-rejections like thi
Hello,
I felt interesting the discussion started by mouss in thread "whitelist
from spamhaus", and particularly the content of the email:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2006-05/0598.html
written by Viktor.
Indeed, I have started since some weeks to use the Postfix SMTP polic
Is it possible to make a header_checks rule apply only to a certain client?
I've got an annoying piece of software which sends messages through Postfix.
This software insists on including a "Sender" header that I wish to filter out
with Postfix, but only for this certain client (or the envelope s
Sorry for this simple and probably already asked question but I couldn't
find any answer anyway...
How to restrict delivery of mail to some addresses (especially local
aliases) to senders from local domains only?
e.g.
I would like only senders from @mycompany.com to be allowed to send a
message
Hello,
This question is stupid, I Think.
I'm trying to understand how milter works, to implement some filters
(develop a milter program)
I haven't found a good documentation about the protocol, actually the
ones that I found are very hard to understand.
Does anyone knows some documentation like
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 01:12:53PM CET, Danilo Paffi Monteiro
said:
> Hello,
>
> This question is stupid, I Think.
>
> I'm trying to understand how milter works, to implement some filters
> (develop a milter program)
>
> I haven't found a good documentation about the protocol, actually the
> o
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:32 PM, mikie mike wrote:
> Sorry for this simple and probably already asked question but I couldn't
> find any answer anyway...
>
> How to restrict delivery of mail to some addresses (especially local
> aliases) to senders from local domains only?
>
> e.g.
>
> I would lik
Danilo Paffi Monteiro wrote:
> This question is stupid, I Think.
>
> I'm trying to understand how milter works, to implement some filters
> (develop a milter program)
>
> I haven't found a good documentation about the protocol, actually the
> ones that I found are very hard to understand.
>
> Does
Danilo Paffi Monteiro:
> Hello,
>
> This question is stupid, I Think.
>
> I'm trying to understand how milter works, to implement some filters
> (develop a milter program)
The Milter API documentation is included with Sendmail source code.
It describes the over-all architecture and API. It's not
Sebastian Chociwski wrote:
> myhostname = suse11.eurimage.pl
> mydestination = suse11.eurimage.pl, localhost, localhost.localdomain
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8
> virtual_alias_domains =
> virtual_alias_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_forwardings.cf,
> mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_e
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:41:14AM +0100, Sebastian Chociwski wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:35:09PM +0100, Sebastian Chociwski wrote:
> >
> >> I am (almost ;) ) 100% sure that only mail could be delivered is in ONE
> >> mysql db.
> >
> > What in your Postfix configuration do you expect to
Victor Duchovni pisze:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:41:14AM +0100, Sebastian Chociwski wrote:
>
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:35:09PM +0100, Sebastian Chociwski wrote:
>>>
> WHICH CONFIGURATION SETTINGS DO YOU EXPECT DO THIS?
Of course I thought it was _email2email.cf .
Now I see how wrong I was.
Martin Strand wrote:
Is it possible to make a header_checks rule apply only to a certain client?
I've got an annoying piece of software which sends messages through Postfix.
This software insists on including a "Sender" header that I wish to filter out
with Postfix, but only for this certain cl
Hi,
Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction to resolving the
following attempted RPM build on Fedora10 X86_64.
I have tried this now on 2 F10 machines.
I also revisited Postfix 2.4.5 src which used to build on F7 ok, but
this package will also not build on F10 as won't 2.5.6
Thank
Hi,
Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction to resolving the
following attempted RPM build on Fedora10 X86_64.
I have tried this now on 2 F10 machines.
I also revisited Postfix 2.4.5 src which used to build on F7 ok, but
this package will also not build on F10 as won't 2.5.6
Thank
James A R Brown wrote the following on 23/03/09 14:38:
> Hi,
>
> Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction to resolving the
> following attempted RPM build on Fedora10 X86_64.
>
> I have tried this now on 2 F10 machines.
>
> I also revisited Postfix 2.4.5 src which used to build on F
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:28:03 +0100, Terry Carmen wrote:
> Martin Strand wrote:
>> Is it possible to make a header_checks rule apply only to a certain client?
>>
>> I've got an annoying piece of software which sends messages through Postfix.
>> This software insists on including a "Sender" header
Martin Strand wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:28:03 +0100, Terry Carmen wrote:
Martin Strand wrote:
Is it possible to make a header_checks rule apply only to a certain client?
I've got an annoying piece of software which sends messages through Postfix.
This software insists on including a "Sen
Madeleine Birkemose wrote:
I have a very simple problem. I have a small /28 network and I want my
postfix host (mose.fekiworld.dk, 87.48.217.12) to relay ALL mail for
all my other machines in this network. However, even if I set
mynetworks right, and I still get 554-rejections like this (from
mai
Hi Alan,
Have you managed a temporary workaround to build the rpm?
ie there a way of changing the build root directory which is indexed I
guess by
rpm --eval '%{_sourcedir}'
Or is this hard compiled into the RPM program?
If what you are saying is the case, bit concerned how to get the mail
serv
Martin Strand wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:28:03 +0100, Terry Carmen wrote:
Martin Strand wrote:
Is it possible to make a header_checks rule apply only to a certain client?
I've got an annoying piece of software which sends messages through Postfix.
This software insists on includin
James A R Brown wrote:
Hi Alan,
Have you managed a temporary workaround to build the rpm?
ie there a way of changing the build root directory which is indexed I
guess by
rpm --eval '%{_sourcedir}'
Or is this hard compiled into the RPM program?
If what you are saying is the case, bit concerned
Madeleine Birkemose:
> Mar 21 17:25:50 mose postfix/smtpd[14019]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> ippenutt.fekiworld.dk[87.48.217.3]: 554 5.7.1 :
> Relay access denied; from=
> to= proto=SMTP helo=
...
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 [:::127.0.0.0]/104 [::1]/128
87.48.217.3 does not match the mynetwor
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:26:36PM +0100, Sebastian Chociwski wrote:
> > Identity mappings (fixedu...@example.com -> fixedu...@example.com) are
> > not terribly useful unless you also have a catch-all address. Why do you
> > have these at all?
>
> Becouse I thought it is responsible for delivering
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:16:45AM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> A further question: "How I say to postfix to use
> 'smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes' and where it will be evaluated?"
You can't. This is a hypothetical feature. It has not yet been (and may
never be) implemented.
--
Vikt
> > A further question: "How I say to postfix to use
> > 'smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes' and where it will be evaluated?"
>
> You can't. This is a hypothetical feature. It has not yet been (and
may
> never be) implemented.
:-(
What a shame! I think that it could be very nice..
rocsca
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 05:10:49PM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> > > A further question: "How I say to postfix to use
> > > 'smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes' and where it will be evaluated?"
> >
> > You can't. This is a hypothetical feature. It has not yet been (and
> may
> > never be) implemen
Viktor,
> > > > A further question: "How I say to postfix to use
> > > > 'smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes' and where it will be
evaluated?"
> > >
> > > You can't. This is a hypothetical feature. It has not yet been
(and
> > may
> > > never be) implemented.
> >
> > :-(
> >
> > What a shame! I think
Hi Alan,
Looks like its not the paths.
I edited /usr/lib/rpm/macros :-
#Path to top of build area.
#%_topdir %(echo $HOME)/rpmbuild
%_topdir/usr/src/redhat
Then I tried again from fresh.
You can see below same error, but new path is being used.
James
[r...@jblap
James A R Brown wrote:
Hi Alan,
Looks like its not the paths.
I edited /usr/lib/rpm/macros :-
#Path to top of build area.
#%_topdir %(echo $HOME)/rpmbuild
%_topdir/usr/src/redhat
Then I tried again from fresh.
You can see below same error, but new path is being
I can't seem to create a proper google search to help me find what I'm
looking for, I'm hoping someone here can point me to the configuration
option.
I want to send a notification to our users if an email hasn't been sent
for 4 hours after they hit the send button. Right now the user gets a
Does postfix have the ability to send out emails placed in a specific folder
through the file system, or does it require a sendmail-style command to get the
sending invoked?
If so, what folder will do this?
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 01:09:12PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
> Does postfix have the ability to send out emails placed in a specific
> folder through the file system, or does it require a sendmail-style
> command to get the sending invoked?
>
> If so, what folder will do this?
http://www.pos
Zitat von Christopher Fisk :
I can't seem to create a proper google search to help me find what
I'm looking for, I'm hoping someone here can point me to the
configuration option.
I want to send a notification to our users if an email hasn't been
sent for 4 hours after they hit the send bu
Rod, This is the reject file. Think I will look at the possibility of
tweaking the postfix-files.patch as clearly the patch is finding a
difference it is not expecting.
I think you are right... its something to do with Fedora, but patching a
file should not really change.
/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/po
On Monday 23 March 2009 18:29:40 James A R Brown wrote:
> Rod, This is the reject file. Think I will look at the possibility of
> tweaking the postfix-files.patch as clearly the patch is finding a
> difference it is not expecting.
>
> I think you are right... its something to do with Fedora, but pa
Melvyn Sopacua:
> > $manpage_directory/man1/postmap.1:f:root:-:644
> > $manpage_directory/man1/postqueue.1:f:root:-:644
> > $manpage_directory/man1/postsuper.1:f:root:-:644
> > + $manpage_directory/man1/sendmail.postfix.1:f:root:-:644
> > $manpage_directory/man5/access.5:f:root:-:644
> > +
- Original Message -
From: "Victor Duchovni"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: Mail drop
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 01:09:12PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
Does postfix have the ability to send out emails placed in a specific
folder through the file system, or d
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:33:01PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
> We have a large text file with contents of the eml message for each person
> in a list. If I find a way to parse each email, is there an easy way to
> inject them into the queue, rather than relaying, because as many have said
>
Hi Wietse,
The rpm in question that I was using is this one :-
http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.5/SRPMS/postfix-2.5.6-1.src.rpm
I have emailed Simon Mudd.
James
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:14 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Melvyn Sopacua:
> > > $manpage_directory/man1/postmap.1:f:root:-:644
> > >
On Monday, March 23, 2009 at 20:33 CET,
Brandon Hilkert wrote:
> > http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html#receiving
>
> We have a large text file with contents of the eml message for each
> person in a list. If I find a way to parse each email, is there an
> easy way to inject them into the q
Brandon Hilkert:
> From: "Victor Duchovni"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Mail drop
>
>
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 01:09:12PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
> >
> >> Does postfix have the ability to send out emails placed in a specific
> >> folder through the file s
- Original Message -
From: "Victor Duchovni"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: Mail drop
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:33:01PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
We have a large text file with contents of the eml message for each
person
in a list. If I find a way to
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:58:29PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
> Having said that, we build a huge text file (~30GB) with about 1 million
> eml messages as its contents. The sender utility then parses out email by
> email and submits it to the IIS SMTP. We're trying to not have to modify
> th
- Original Message -
From: "Victor Duchovni"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: Mail drop
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:58:29PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
Having said that, we build a huge text file (~30GB) with about 1 million
eml messages as its contents. The
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:16:06PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
>>> Having said that, we build a huge text file (~30GB) with about 1 million
>>> eml messages as its contents. The sender utility then parses out email by
>>> email and submits it to the IIS SMTP. We're trying to not have to modify
>
- Original Message -
From: "Victor Duchovni"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: Mail drop
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:16:06PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
Having said that, we build a huge text file (~30GB) with about 1
million
eml messages as its contents. The
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:32:43PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
>> The application won't run any faster than the code that serially parses
>> the 30GB file. If this code can use a pool of SMTP sender "threads" and
>> can parse the file quickly enough, you could try that.
>
> The parsing isn't a b
- Original Message -
From: "Victor Duchovni"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: Mail drop
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:32:43PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
The application won't run any faster than the code that serially parses
the 30GB file. If this code can us
On Monday 23 March 2009 21:16:06 Brandon Hilkert wrote:
> I appreciate the insight. Unfortunately the process is what it is. I don't
> have any control over development. My job is to make sure the systems work
> properly. I'm trying to help as asked. The file also contains html to allow
> a user t
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Victor Duchovni"
>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 4:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Mail drop
>
>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:32:43PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
>>
The application won't
- Original Message -
From: "Victor Duchovni"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: Mail drop
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Victor Duchovni"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 4:43 PM
Subject:
Brandon Hilkert:
> I"m not disputing this fact. I used smtp-source with 10 connections.
>
> Without DKIM signing - 14,634 emails/min
> With DKIM signing - 4,762 emails/min
>
> I think we would both agree that that's a large discrepancy.
Yes.
> I'm using DKIM-milter. During the testing, the CPU
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 05:34:42PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
>> if DKIM consumes all available CPU, find a faster DKIM engine. If DKIM
>> clobbers the disk capacity, consider placing the working area of the DKIM
>> process in tmpfs, because neither milters nor SMTP proxies queue mail, so
>> th
- Original Message -
From: "Wietse Venema"
To: "Postfix users"
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: Mail drop
Brandon Hilkert:
I"m not disputing this fact. I used smtp-source with 10 connections.
Without DKIM signing - 14,634 emails/min
With DKIM signing - 4,762 emai
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 05:54:07PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
>> dkim-milter is one program that you are asking to sign lots of
>> messages in parallel. To implement parallelism, dkim-milter uses
>> mutiple threads in one process. To keep the threads from tripping
>> over each other, dkim-milte
- Original Message -
From: "Victor Duchovni"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: Mail drop
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 05:54:07PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
dkim-milter is one program that you are asking to sign lots of
messages in parallel. To implement parallel
Hello all,
I'm having an issue that I believe is coming from Postfix. I am sending mail
to an address which contains special characters. Those characters aid me in
routing the mail but unfortunately it seems to be rejected before being
relayed. The format is as follows, a block of text followed by
At 03:54 PM 3/23/2009, you wrote:
Hello all,
I'm having an issue that I believe is coming from Postfix. I am
sending mail to an address which contains special characters. Those
characters aid me in routing the mail but unfortunately it seems to
be rejected before being relayed. The format is a
Thanks for the quick reply. Sure thing on the logs.
20090320 22:42:55 38236 49A2055900086768 QUEUE
From=>
Size=1203 Relay=192.168.xxx.xxx
20090320 22:42:55 38237 49A2055900086768 QUEUE Recipient=>
20090320 22:42:55 38238 49A2055900086768 QUEUE Message-ID=<
11b8df6cb
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Mischa Gresser wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply. Sure thing on the logs.
>
> 20090320 22:42:55 38236 49A2055900086768 QUEUE
> From= Size=1203 Relay=192.168.xxx.xxx
>
> 20090320 22:42:55 38237 49A2055900086768 QUEUE
> Recipient=
>
> 20090320 2
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 06:15:13PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
>> MEASURE! Find out what is slowing it down. When you know what that
>> is, ask the question again.
>
> What are the best tools to get a feel for hardware performance and
> utilitization? Top, atop, vmstat ?
>
> As you can probably
On Monday 23 March 2009 23:54:24 Mischa Gresser wrote:
> The format is as follows, a block of text followed by an "="
> followed by more text and a number, followed by a "|" and then numbers @
> the domain.com ie: "text=option1|123456...@address.com".
> When sending from Gmail for instance I get t
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:15:02PM -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> > 20090320 22:42:57 38247?? 49A2055900086768 DSN
> > For= Action=Failed Status=5.5.0 (other or undefined
> > protocol status) Diagnostic 501 5.1.3 Bad recipient address syntax
> >
>
> those don't look like postfix logs. also
Victor Duchovni:
> and may be causing high disk latency. You have to tune the milter
> configuration
There is no need for dkim-milter to touch the disk. It receives
header and body content from Postfix via the Milter protocol. I
know this, because I implemented the Postfix side of the protocol.
Brandon Hilkert:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wietse Venema"
> To: "Postfix users"
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 5:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Mail drop
>
>
> > Brandon Hilkert:
> >> I"m not disputing this fact. I used smtp-source with
Aaron Wolfe:
> > 20090320 22:42:56 38242?? 49A2055900086768 SMTP RCPT TO
> > got reply '501 5.1.3 Bad recipient address
> > syntax'
The above logging is from the system that is sending mail into
Postfix.
To find out what commands the client sends you need to turn on
logging (debug_peer_l
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:24:50PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > and may be causing high disk latency. You have to tune the milter
> > configuration
>
> There is no need for dkim-milter to touch the disk. It receives
> header and body content from Postfix via the Milter prot
I have a postfix system set up that works fine (well, maybe that is
because it is not totally on-line yet :-\ ). But testing has been great.
Once it goes live this system is going to be used to send email alerts
to users based on certain database activity. Actually, a script which
runs again
jeffs wrote:
I have a postfix system set up that works fine (well, maybe that is
because it is not totally on-line yet :-\ ). But testing has been great.
Once it goes live this system is going to be used to send email alerts
to users based on certain database activity. Actually, a script whi
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Mischa Gresser wrote:
> Is this the correct log?
>
> Mar 20 10:13:01 hostname postfix/qmgr[15441]: 39F9BAD0063: removed
> Mar 20 10:13:31 hostname postfix/smtpd[31210]: connect from
> qw-out-2122.google.com[74.125.92.26]
> Mar 20 10:13:32 hostname postfix/smtpd[312
Mischa Gresser:
> Mar 20 10:13:32 hostname postfix/smtpd[31210]: warning: Illegal address
> syntax from qw-out-2122.google.com[74.125.92.26] in RCPT command: 1231231...@xxx.ca <4034767...@crebifax.ca>>
The RCPT command syntax is:
RCPT TO:<4034767...@crebifax.ca>
Not:
RCPT TO:>
The aut
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, jeffs wrote:
There is the slight potential for abuse by these logged in users that
one or two may figure out a way to send spam through this system by
forging (not login) credentials that the database uses to sort out
outbound email.
This
Is this the correct log?
Mar 20 10:13:01 hostname postfix/qmgr[15441]: 39F9BAD0063: removed
Mar 20 10:13:31 hostname postfix/smtpd[31210]: connect from
qw-out-2122.google.com[74.125.92.26]
Mar 20 10:13:32 hostname postfix/smtpd[31210]: warning: Illegal address
syntax from qw-out-2122.google.com[7
- Original Message -
From: "Wietse Venema"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: Mail drop
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:24:50PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > and may be causing high disk latency. You have to tune the milter
> >
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, jeffs wrote:
> There is the slight potential for abuse by these logged in users that
> one or two may figure out a way to send spam through this system by
> forging (not login) credentials that the database uses to sort out
> outbound email.
This is really shady. Why c
Victor Duchovni:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:24:50PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Victor Duchovni:
> > > and may be causing high disk latency. You have to tune the milter
> > > configuration
> >
> > There is no need for dkim-milter to touch the disk. It receives
> > header and body content
jeffs wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, jeffs wrote:
There is the slight potential for abuse by these logged in users that
one or two may figure out a way to send spam through this system by
forging (not login) credentials that the database uses to sort out
outbound email
Martin Strand a écrit :
> Is it possible to make a header_checks rule apply only to a certain client?
>
No.
> I've got an annoying piece of software which sends messages through Postfix.
> This software insists on including a "Sender" header that I wish to filter
> out with Postfix, but only fo
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:22:42 +0100, Noel Jones wrote:
>> No, it's only the "Sender" *header* that's causing problems, not the actual
>> envelope sender.
>> I added an IGNORE line to filter out all Sender headers, but I would prefer
>> to only apply that filter to this specific client.
>> After r
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:46:16PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
>>> Tracing the system calls in the milter may help (when sending just
>>> one message to reduce confusion).
>>
>> strace-ing a multi-threaded program, have fun.
That's why only one message should be sent. There should not be too ma
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:44:28PM -0400, Mischa Gresser wrote:
> Is this the correct log?
>
>
> Mar 20 10:13:01 hostname postfix/qmgr[15441]: 39F9BAD0063: removed
> Mar 20 10:13:31 hostname postfix/smtpd[31210]: connect from
> qw-out-2122.google.com[74.125.92.26]
> Mar 20 10:13:32 hostname post
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mischa Gresser:
>> Mar 20 10:13:32 hostname postfix/smtpd[31210]: warning: Illegal address
>> syntax from qw-out-2122.google.com[74.125.92.26] in RCPT command: > 1231231...@xxx.ca <4034767...@crebifax.ca>>
>
> The RCPT command syntax is:
>
>
I have a query i want postfix not to try sending mails to a destination
which is dead. Does postfix maintains cache or is there any settings to be
done for it. Tried googleing found this two directives. But dont exactly
know it really works .
minimal_backoff_time = 86400
maximal_backoff_time = 86
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Ashwin Muni wrote:
> I have a query i want postfix not to try sending mails to a destination
> which is dead. Does postfix maintains cache or is there any settings to be
> done for it. Tried googleing found this two directives. But dont exactly
> know it really works .
>
> mi
On Mar 23, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Ashwin Muni wrote:
Ex: I'm sending a mail to xyz.com and my server could not connect to
the xyz.com smtp server. My mail gets deffered and then it tries as
per my setting but later another user of mine tries to send mail to
the same domain and it happens again.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:31:03AM +0530, Ashwin Muni wrote:
> I have a query i want postfix not to try sending mails to a destination
> which is dead. Does postfix maintains cache or is there any settings to be
> done for it. Tried googleing found this two directives. But dont exactly
> know it r
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Ashwin Muni wrote:
> I have a query i want postfix not to try sending mails to a destination
> which is dead. Does postfix maintains cache or is there any settings to be
> done for it. Tried googleing found this two directives. But dont exactly
> know it really wo
what is the directive to limit no of smtp connection to a same destination
(Not Message) and what is the directive that can set no of messages per smtp
connections
--
Ashwin R.
2009/3/24 Ashwin Muni :
> what is the directive to limit no of smtp connection to a same destination
> (Not Message) and what is the directive that can set no of messages per smtp
> connections
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#default_destination_concurrency_limit
http://www.postfix.org/pos
On 3/17/09, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 3/16/2009, aio shin (aios...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> here the result of postconf -n
>
> Please don't FORMAT it (ie, add blank lines, etc)... just copy/paste it
> AS IS.
>
> I fyou really want help on the postfix list, you really do need to read
> the DEBUG_READM
93 matches
Mail list logo
