Hi Wietse, The rpm in question that I was using is this one :-
http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.5/SRPMS/postfix-2.5.6-1.src.rpm I have emailed Simon Mudd. James On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:14 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Melvyn Sopacua: > > > $manpage_directory/man1/postmap.1:f:root:-:644 > > > $manpage_directory/man1/postqueue.1:f:root:-:644 > > > $manpage_directory/man1/postsuper.1:f:root:-:644 > > > + $manpage_directory/man1/sendmail.postfix.1:f:root:-:644 > > > $manpage_directory/man5/access.5:f:root:-:644 > > > + $manpage_directory/man5/aliases.postfix.5:f:root:-:644 > > > $manpage_directory/man5/body_checks.5:f:root:-:644 > > > $manpage_directory/man5/canonical.5:f:root:-:644 > > > $manpage_directory/man5/cidr_table.5:f:root:-:644 > > > > This isn't OS specific. The patch in the rpm is wrong, because since a few > > versions there is a bounce(5) manpage at line 148. > > Correct. With Postfix 2.3 and later, file conf/postfix-files > has a line with > > $manpage_directory/man5/bounce.5:f:root:-:644 > > between the lines with "body_checks.5" and "canonical.5". So it > looks like Fedora Core 10 is using an ancient version of their > patchfile. > > Wietse
