-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I need to change email sent by a user from one domain (a.com) so that
clicking Reply will reply to him at b.com. (a.com isn't always reliable,
and I admin b.com, among other reasons.)
Google got me to postfix.org's documentation on generic maps. I'm
r
On 3/4/2009 1:57 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 1:06 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
In looking at the file in xxx/deferred, my mailserver is trying to
return an undelivable message and it looks like there is something wrong
with the site. " said: 557 Invalid routingNCrequest - domain in
BLACK LIST."
Basically I think the site is a spammer and they are blacklisted. How
can
Carver Banks wrote:
Hello,
I am in the process of setting up an internal mail server
(carver-test.mydomain.local) using postfix, dovecot and squirrel mail.
I want the users of this system only be able send mail to a few users in
mydomain.com
I imagine that there is an easy way to map this to a
On 4-Mar-2009, at 14:33, Jorey Bump wrote:
smtpd_tls_security_level should be used instead.
Not if you don't want to force TLS on the submission port it shouldn't.
On 4-Mar-2009, at 13:21, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
*encrypt*
Mandatory TLS encryption: announce STARTTLS support to
LuKreme a écrit :
> What controls escaping "From " in the body of a mail message if it's at
> the start of a line? Since I've switched everyone over to Maildir, it
> seems silly to do this anymore, but I can't find the setting. In fact,
> I'm not even sure it's in postfix at all.
look at what you
Jim McIver wrote:
In looking at the file in xxx/deferred, my mailserver is trying to
return an undelivable message and it looks like there is something wrong
with the site. " said: 557 Invalid routingNCrequest - domain in
BLACK LIST."
Basically I think the site is a spammer and they are bla
Daniel L. Miller a écrit :
> Ok - now that I've fixed my idiotic routing errors (don't have two NIC's
> on the same network unless you know what you're doing - which I clearly
> don't!), I can get back to Postfix.
>
> From my prior configuration questions in ages past, I have been trying
> to make
Santiago Romero:
> Wietse Venema escribi?:
> > Santiago Romero:
> >
> >> I case it happens again ... Where or what should I take a look? At OS
> >> level (disk or network I/O, processes...) I didn't see anything before
> >> the "postfix restart"...
> >>
> >
> > Try ``strace -o filename
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Ok - now that I've fixed my idiotic routing errors (don't have two NIC's
on the same network unless you know what you're doing - which I clearly
don't!), I can get back to Postfix.
From my prior configuration questions in ages past, I have been trying
to make most of
Hello,
I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was hoping that
someone here would give me an idea on where to get started.
here's the situation. (Made up names)
server is postfix with amavis-new, spam-assassin and dovecot. logs are fairly
verbose.
Alice (al...@example.com)
Noel,
Guess I'm confused. I have a relay_recipient and recipient_access files
listing only valid user's email addresses for my company.
ie..
relay_recipients
bg...@lmtribune.com any_value
bi...@lmtribune.com any_value
bjohn...@lmtribune.com any_value
recipient_access
bg...@lmtribune.co
Ray wrote:
Hello,
I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was hoping that
someone here would give me an idea on where to get started.
here's the situation. (Made up names)
server is postfix with amavis-new, spam-assassin and dovecot. logs are fairly
verbose.
Alice (al..
Noel Jones wrote:
Define content_filter in main.cf pointing to the spam processing
machine, define a new smtpd listener in master.cf listening on a
different port.
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
Amavisd-new is software often used as a postfix content_filter. Even
if you're using s
Thanks for your feedback. I do have $myhostname defined and you've
confirmed what I thought. It's their issue and they need to fix it.
Again, thanks.
-- Rob
On 3/4/09 12:19 PM, "LuKreme" wrote:
> On 4-Mar-2009, at 12:33, Rob Tanner wrote:
>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: Spa
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Noel Jones
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:22 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: restricting who can be sent to.
>
> Carver Banks wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I
mouss wrote:
to setup a Postfix listener for local SMTP connections, which will then
forward to a relayhost for spam processing (in this case, primarily
auto-whitelisting). That relayhost will then send the message back to
Postfix on another connection, and THAT listener will not have a
relayhos
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> Ray wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was hoping
> > that someone here would give me an idea on where to get started.
> >
> > here's the situation. (Made up names)
> >
> > server is postfix wit
Please don't top-post. Thank you.
On Wed March 4 2009 17:10:49 Jim McIver wrote:
> Guess I'm confused. I have a relay_recipient and recipient_access
> files listing only valid user's email addresses for my company.
> ie..
> relay_recipients
> bg...@lmtribune.com any_value
> bi...@lmtribune.com
On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
Ray wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > Ray wrote:
> >
> > > Alice (al...@example.com) sends Bob an Email (b...@myserver.com) CC
> > > (b...@3rdserver.com) I run myserver.com. message goes through to
> > > b...@3rdser
On Wed March 4 2009 17:26:01 Ray wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > Ray wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was
> > > hoping that someone here would give me an idea on where to get
> > > started.
> > >
> > > here's
On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:22 CET,
"Daniel L. Miller" wrote:
> Noel Jones wrote:
>
> > Define content_filter in main.cf pointing to the spam processing
> > machine, define a new smtpd listener in master.cf listening on a
> > different port.
> > http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.htm
On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:25 CET,
"Daniel L. Miller" wrote:
> What I have/had now was the following:
> master.cf:
> 192.168.0.11:smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
> -o relayhost=[192.168.0.10]:225
> 192.168.0.11:125 inet n - - -
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:35:01 Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
>
> Ray wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > > Ray wrote:
> > > > Alice (al...@example.com) sends Bob an Email (b...@myserver.com) CC
> > > > (b...@3rdserver.co
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:37:37 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wed March 4 2009 17:26:01 Ray wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > > Ray wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was
> > > > hoping that someone here would g
when you have "to=, orig_to=" in
the maillog file, that translation is handled by /etc/postfix/virtual,
isn't it?
If j...@example.com is not in /etc/postfix/virtual, where else could
this be controlled?
I did grep -ir jo...@example.com /etc/postfix/ and got 0 hits, so it's
not in virtua
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Pawel Lesniak
Sent: Wednesday, 4 March 2009 7:32 PM
To: postfix users list
Subject: Re: Spam attacks
W dniu 2009-03-03 23:34, MacShane, Tracy pisze:
On 4-Mar-2009, at 15:28, mouss wrote:
LuKreme a écrit :
What controls escaping "From " in the body of a mail message if
it's at
the start of a line? Since I've switched everyone over to Maildir, it
seems silly to do this anymore, but I can't find the setting. In
fact,
I'm not even sure it'
At 04:07 PM 3/4/2009, you wrote:
when you have "to=, orig_to=" in
the maillog file, that translation is handled by /etc/postfix/virtual,
isn't it?
If j...@example.com is not in /etc/postfix/virtual, where else could
this be controlled?
I did grep -ir jo...@example.com /etc/postfix/ and got 0 hi
On 4-Mar-2009, at 15:18, Robert A. Ober wrote:
Thanks to Brian and others for hanging in there with me!
I think you owe everyone on this thread (which I was not part of, so
no self-interest) a beer. :)
--
#27794 ... I wonder if the really nerdy Klingons learn how
to speak english
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:07:44PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> when you have "to=, orig_to=" in the
> maillog file, that translation is handled by /etc/postfix/virtual, isn't
> it?
No, by any mechanism that rewrites the envelope recipient in cleanup(8):
recipient_canonical_maps
canonical_m
/dev/rob0 wrote:
Please don't top-post. Thank you.
On Wed March 4 2009 17:10:49 Jim McIver wrote:
Guess I'm confused. I have a relay_recipient and recipient_access
files listing only valid user's email addresses for my company.
ie..
relay_recipients
bg...@lmtribune.com any_value
bi...@
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:11:02PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 4-Mar-2009, at 15:28, mouss wrote:
>> LuKreme a ?crit :
>>> What controls escaping "From " in the body of a mail message if it's at
>>> the start of a line? Since I've switched everyone over to Maildir, it
>>> seems silly to do this any
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Ray wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:35:01 Magnus Bäck wrote:
>> On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
>>
>> Ray wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
>> > > Ray wrote:
>> > > > Alice (al...@example.com) sends Bob a
Ray(r...@stilltech.net)@Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:46:21PM -0700:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:37:37 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > On Wed March 4 2009 17:26:01 Ray wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > > > Ray wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > I'm having an issue with mail
LuKreme wrote, at 03/04/2009 05:24 PM:
> On 4-Mar-2009, at 14:33, Jorey Bump wrote:
>> smtpd_tls_security_level should be used instead.
>
> Not if you don't want to force TLS on the submission port it shouldn't.
The context is irrelevant. smtpd_tls_security_level is the new parameter
that replace
On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:12, Jorey Bump wrote:
LuKreme wrote, at 03/04/2009 05:24 PM:
On 4-Mar-2009, at 14:33, Jorey Bump wrote:
smtpd_tls_security_level should be used instead.
Not if you don't want to force TLS on the submission port it
shouldn't.
The context is irrelevant.
Of course the
On 4-Mar-2009, at 17:13, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:07:44PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
If j...@example.com is not in /etc/postfix/virtual, where else
could this
be controlled?
See above. Consider also that the rewrite could be based on a partial
match of either the domain o
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:26:34PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> $ grep southgaylord.com /var/log/maillog| grep orig_to | grep john | awk
> '{print $7" "$8}'
> to=, orig_to=,
> to=, orig_to=,
hiding the full logging for the message in question is not helpful. Do
ditch the awk script and report all oth
J.P. Trosclair wrote, at 03/04/2009 05:01 PM:
> I'll research the smtpd_tls_security_level option further. It didn't
> present a problem until I started working on this specific feature with
> the white lists. I have created another smtpd instance to forward white
> listed domains to rather than t
LuKreme wrote, at 03/04/2009 09:25 PM:
> On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:12, Jorey Bump wrote:
>> LuKreme wrote, at 03/04/2009 05:24 PM:
>>> On 4-Mar-2009, at 14:33, Jorey Bump wrote:
smtpd_tls_security_level should be used instead.
>>>
>>> Not if you don't want to force TLS on the submission port it sho
On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:37, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:26:34PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
$ grep southgaylord.com /var/log/maillog| grep orig_to | grep john
| awk
'{print $7" "$8}'
to=, orig_to=,
to=, orig_to=,
hiding the full logging for the message in question is not helpful
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:17:27PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:37, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:26:34PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
>>> $ grep southgaylord.com /var/log/maillog| grep orig_to | grep john | awk
>>> '{print $7" "$8}'
>>> to=, orig_to=,
>>> to=, orig
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 18:10:22 Bill Weiss wrote:
> Ray(r...@stilltech.net)@Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:46:21PM -0700:
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:37:37 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > > On Wed March 4 2009 17:26:01 Ray wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > > > > Ray
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 17:49:57 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Ray wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:35:01 Magnus Bäck wrote:
> >> On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
> >>
> >> Ray wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12
On 4-Mar-2009, at 20:29, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:17:27PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:37, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:26:34PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
$ grep southgaylord.com /var/log/maillog| grep orig_to | grep
john | awk
'{prin
On 4-Mar-2009, at 20:29, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Add "-v" to the cleanup(8) service to see where the change was made.
cleanup unix n - n - 0 cleanup -v
that REALLY broke things.
Lots of stuff, ending with:
Mar 4 20:58:22 mail postfix/cleanup[55873]: cleanup
Sorry, I should have filled in all this information before hand :(
Server is live and fully functional. it deals with thousands of messages
per day and has for over a year. One user can't receive messages from one
contact. That contact doesn't even show up in the logs as spam or lost
connection
Ray wrote:
Alice (al...@example.com) sends Bob an Email (b...@myserver.com) CC
(b...@3rdserver.com) I run myserver.com. message goes through to
b...@3rdserver.com, but not b...@myserver.com.
there is absolutely no trace of alice's domain in the mail logs.
Do you have "smtpd_delay_reject = yes
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 20:18:18 Paweł Leśniak wrote:
[snip]
> Sure. I'm sending myself emails sometime. But I'm using server which is
> permitted to send with address from my domain. So that's surely not 100%
> spam when sender eq recipient. But then we come to definition of spam. It's
in simp
One of my clients sends mail using a custom application which *cannot*
recognize a smtpd error message .. like user-not-found, or
invalid-domain etc
Now they want our postfix server to accept all mails without checks and
send NDR's for undeliverable mails.
Can I write a special transport in post
Summary:
I realize that the problem most likely is not due to postfix (thus the OT in
the subject), but I figured someone here might have seen this before
Server is live and fully functional. it deals with thousands of messages per
day and has for over a year. One user can't receive messages
Ray(r...@stilltech.net)@Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:32:40PM -0700:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 18:10:22 Bill Weiss wrote:
(lots of content snipped for context)
> > Have you tried getting a pcap while the mystery server is supposed to be
> > sending you mail?
>
> Haven't done this yet, but I will try
Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:25 CET,
"Daniel L. Miller" wrote:
What I have/had now was the following:
master.cf:
192.168.0.11:smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
-o relayhost=[192.168.0.10]:225
192.168.0.11:125 inet n -
101 - 154 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
