Re: Prevent vacation autoreply for recipient_delimiter?

post...@corwyn.net a écrit : > At 01:57 PM 2/21/2009, mouss wrote: >> post...@corwyn.net a écrit : >> Alternatively, change your delivery config so that mail to >> *+s...@yourdomain.example uses a different delivery mechanism, one that >> doesn't call your vacation script. > > See, I knew there'd

Forward a copy of each mail to another smtp-server

Hi! Because i have to move from one server to another one (new hardware and new provider) with all domains, i also have to move all emailaccounts to the new server. Because i wan't to move "step by step" i have to think about synchronisation of the email-accounts. My prefered way would be to forwa

Re: Prevent vacation autoreply for recipient_delimiter?

On 2/21/2009, post...@corwyn.net (post...@corwyn.net) wrote: > I think our thought process is different. I have a technical thing I > want to do (and understand in postfix). So it depends on how you > define things as a problem. Fair enough, but the email subject and problem description were, why

mail from restriction

hi, i am using postfix. i want to restrict my users that they cannot send mail using other domain. Like my domain is- abc.com, nobody of my users can send mail using yahoo.com/gmail com. but have to receive mail from other domains. is it possible, if so how, pls help. Regards- Meshbah

Re: Forward a copy of each mail to another smtp-server

Kai Szymanski a écrit : > Hi! > > Because i have to move from one server to another one (new hardware and > new provider) with all domains, i also have to move all emailaccounts to > the new server. Because i wan't to move "step by step" i have to think > about synchronisation of the email-account

Re: mail from restriction

Meshbah Uddin Ahmed a écrit : > hi, > > i am using postfix. i want to restrict my users that they cannot send > mail using other domain. Like my domain is- abc.com , > nobody of my users can send mail using yahoo.com/gmail > com. but have to receive mail fr

dovecot_destination_recipient_limit not appearing in postconf -n ?

I'm using dovecot as: virtual_transport = dovecot and have: dovecot_destination_recipient_limit =1 in main.cf However, when I run postconf -n the dovecot_destination_recipient_limit =1 value doesn't appear (and neither does my vacation_destination_recipient_limit =1 for that matter, hmm). (T

Re: dovecot_destination_recipient_limit not appearing in postconf -n ?

The postconf command does not read master.cf, therefore parameters such as "transport"_destination_recipient_limit parameters usually don't appear in postconf output. Wietse

Re: postfix, cannot receive email.

On Fri February 20 2009 23:25:31 Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, post...@yeah.net wrote: > > Feb 21 11:33:21 server2 postfix/smtpd[18192]: connect from > > rv-out-0708.google.com[209.85.198.244] Feb 21 11:35:03 server2 > > postfix/smtpd[18192]: lost connection after CONNECT from > > rv-o

Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses, domain names etc. If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is. TIA JLA

Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

KLaM Postmaster wrote: Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses, domain names etc. If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is. It's publicly archived in a number of places, and posts here

Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

Mark Goodge wrote: > KLaM Postmaster wrote: >> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it >> is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses, >> domain names etc. >> If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is. > > It's publicly archived in a

Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

On Sun February 22 2009 16:05:09 KLaM Postmaster wrote: > Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if > it is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses, > domain names etc. > If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is. http://www.google.com/

Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > Mark Goodge wrote: >> KLaM Postmaster wrote: >>> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it >>> is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses, >>> domain names etc. >>> If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is

Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

mouss wrote: > KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > >> Mark Goodge wrote: >> >>> KLaM Postmaster wrote: >>> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses, domain names etc. If it o

Mail forwarding based on from address

Perhaps this question has been asked before, if so, my apology. Is it possible for postfix to forward mail based on a from address, as in received from a certain address or domain? Thanks. T Islam Detroit Media Partnership

Re: Mail forwarding based on from address

On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Islam, Towhid wrote: > Perhaps this question has been asked before, if so, my apology. Is it > possible for postfix to forward mail based on a from address, as in > received from a certain address or domain? Thanks. http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#check_sender_access

Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

/dev/rob0 wrote: > On Sun February 22 2009 16:05:09 KLaM Postmaster wrote: > >> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if >> it is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses, >> domain names etc. >> If it open (that is publicly readable) then there