mouss wrote: > KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > >> Mark Goodge wrote: >> >>> KLaM Postmaster wrote: >>> >>>> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it >>>> is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses, >>>> domain names etc. >>>> If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is. >>>> >>> It's publicly archived in a number of places, and posts here will show >>> up in a Google search. These are some of the archives, I'm sure there >>> are others: >>> >>> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org >>> http://www.pubbs.net/postfix >>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users >>> >>> Mark >>> >> Thanks, looks like I have to keep munging. Now I need to either develop >> or find a good munging script. >> >> > > note that you can't munge infos that are added after you post. for example: > > Received: from mail.klam.ca (mail.klam.ca [206.53.59.9]) > Mmmm, you noticed. That one slipped by me! > ... > > when you munge, use "standard" example conventions: > > - for domains, use *.example.com, *.example.org, *.example.net or *.example. > - for routable IPs, use 192.0.2.* > - for private IPs, use one of the private IP classes (10.* should be > enough...) > > And do that consistently. for example, don't replace "netoyen.net" with > "example.net" but at the same time replace "mo...@netoyen.net" with > "j...@bar.example", because this hides the fact that this user is from > that domain... etc. > Thanks for the tips, as you have probably worked out by now I need all the help I can get.
Once again Thanks JLA
