On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 01:56:11PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, mouss wrote:
>
>> if you forward DNS queries to your ISP, then the rate limit applies to
>> your ISP. spamhaus don't see mail hitting your servers. They only see DNS
>> queries.
>
> Ah, so! That explains it. I ru
The routing I need, have to depend of the 'from: field' and not the 'to:
field'.
Are you sure table transport permit that ?
- Original Message -
From: "jeff donovan"
To: "Gilles Albusac"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: Multiple SMTP relays based on sender'
secSwami wrote:
Thanks a bunch Thomas!!
One more thing do you create users on the system itself or use users
and password from a file?
Thanks again...much much appreciated.
So far, i only use regular Unix users from /etc/passswd, nothing virtual ...
Does it work for you?
Dear List,
I am trying to host mailling services for two domains under the same
instance of postfix (2.2.10). The name of the domains are rpg.in and cpl.in.
The domains will have separate name space for them. The user details are
kept in LDAP. The maildrop is my local delivery agent. The mailstore
Dear All,
How can I move the postfix queues from one server to another.
I have two servers 1) First server is live and have more that 1 mails
on queue
2) Second server is also having the same
setup.
I want to transfer all the m,ail ques from first server to secon
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> We have a milter that examines emails and adds headers if it believes they
> are spam. However, it looks like 33% of the time, the headers that we've
> added to the email are stripped out by postfix before delivery, which ends
> up causing a lot of spam to get delivered.
Gejo Paul:
> Dear All,
>
> How can I move the postfix queues from one server to another.
> I have two servers 1) First server is live and have more that 1 mails
> on queue
> 2) Second server is also having the same
> setup.
> I want to transfer all the m,ail ques
Hi all,
Does somebody know what may cause a confusion like this?
In maillog you can see, that the sender is \"from=\" (see below)
r...@smtp3 # cat /var/log/mail-smtp3-090115.log | grep 55BB716282
Jan 15 04:43:25 smtp3 postfix/smtpd[17488]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 55BB716282:
client=localhost[127.
secSwami wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So after trying and trying other methods of making postfix send emails
> for the SASL authenticated users to work, I am trying to now use
> dovecot sasl config.
> My main purpose is that I should be able to SEND email from anywhere
> on the internet using my POSTFIX mail s
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
You can configure dnscache to forward queries for zen.spamhaus.org to
different upstream servers than the rest of the queries (list IP's, one
per line, in root/servers/zen.spamhaus.org - not sure whether you can tell
it to do recursive resolving for su
Goutam Baul wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I am trying to host mailling services for two domains under the same
> instance of postfix (2.2.10). The name of the domains are rpg.in and cpl.in.
> The domains will have separate name space for them. The user details are
> kept in LDAP. The maildrop is my local
Hello,
(Maybe this is not that much a postfix question, but i am rather
clueless right now, and i belive on this list someone might be able to
help me)
On a server I have a installation of postfix 2.5 running for handling
some outbound mail traffic. It works like a champ, besides when the
r
Hi,
I'm having some problems with setting a regexp transport map. What I
want is:
1) Mail for u...@domain.com is delivered locally via the Zimbra system.
2) Mail for u...@machine.domain.com should be delivered directly to that
machine.
3) All other (i.e. external) mail should be relayed via
rel
Rob Horton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having some problems with setting a regexp transport map. What I
> want is:
>
> 1) Mail for u...@domain.com is delivered locally via the Zimbra system.
>
> 2) Mail for u...@machine.domain.com should be delivered directly to that
> machine.
>
> 3) All other (i.e. exte
On Jan 16, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Rob Horton wrote:
Hi,
I'm having some problems with setting a regexp transport map. What I
want is:
1) Mail for u...@domain.com is delivered locally via the Zimbra
system.
2) Mail for u...@machine.domain.com should be delivered directly to
that
machine.
3
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 03:10:01PM +, Rob Horton wrote:
> I'm having some problems with setting a regexp transport map. What I
> want is:
You don't need regexp transport tables for this.
> 1) Mail for u...@domain.com is delivered locally via the Zimbra system.
List this domain in mydestinat
Meno wrote:
Hi all,
Does somebody know what may cause a confusion like this?
In maillog you can see, that the sender is \"from=\" (see below)
r...@smtp3 # cat /var/log/mail-smtp3-090115.log | grep 55BB716282
Jan 15 04:43:25 smtp3 postfix/smtpd[17488]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 55BB716282:
client=
--On Friday, January 16, 2009 7:01 AM -0500 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
We have a milter that examines emails and adds headers if it believes
they are spam. However, it looks like 33% of the time, the headers
that we've added to the email are stripped out by postfix before
de
--On Friday, January 16, 2009 10:03 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
--On Friday, January 16, 2009 7:01 AM -0500 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
We have a milter that examines emails and adds headers if it believes
they are spam. However, it looks like 33% of the time, the h
I am setting up a server for our mailing lists. That server will not
be used for anything but those mailing lists.
Can I turn off emailing notices back?
Would it make it harder for those sending spam?
Would that help cut down backscatter messages?
Would it be a bad idea?
Thanks
Gary
Rich Shepard a écrit :
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
>
>> You can configure dnscache to forward queries for zen.spamhaus.org to
>> different upstream servers than the rest of the queries (list IP's, one
>> per line, in root/servers/zen.spamhaus.org - not sure whether you can
>> tel
Gary Frederick a écrit :
> I am setting up a server for our mailing lists. That server will not
> be used for anything but those mailing lists.
>
> Can I turn off emailing notices back?
what does this mean?
> Would it make it harder for those sending spam?
> Would that help cut down backscat
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, mouss wrote:
If you can't get djbdns to do its own resolution, install bind. setting up
a "caching only" bind is relatively trivial (and many systems come with a
fully working default setup).
Mouss,
Using dnsmasq works so there's probably no added value in setting up an
More details
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Gary Frederick wrote:
> I am setting up a server for our mailing lists. That server will not
> be used for anything but those mailing lists.
>
> Can I turn off emailing notices back?
I was wondering if I could turn off sending messages back when an
At 12:28 PM 1/16/2009, you wrote:
> Would it make it harder for those sending spam?
I was wondering if it would make it harder if spammers got nothing.
How many spammers do you think use a valid return address?
Spammers likely 'get nothing' now
Gary Frederick:
> More details
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Gary Frederick wrote:
> > I am setting up a server for our mailing lists. That server will not
> > be used for anything but those mailing lists.
> >
> > Can I turn off emailing notices back?
>
> I was wondering if I could turn
:-)
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Gary Frederick:
>> More details
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Gary Frederick
>> wrote:
>> > I am setting up a server for our mailing lists. That server will not
>> > be used for anything but those mailing lists.
>> >
>> > Can
On Jan 16, 2009, at 2:18 PM, mouss wrote:
Rich Shepard a écrit :
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
You can configure dnscache to forward queries for zen.spamhaus.org
to
different upstream servers than the rest of the queries (list
IP's, one
per line, in root/servers/zen.spamhaus
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
>
[snip]> I now have it working, as far as I can tell, as I want. The goal
was to
> have a submission service that forces authentication and requires that
> authenticated users only send from addresses they own.
>
> So I now have:
>
> submission inet n - n
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Evan Platt wrote:
> At 12:28 PM 1/16/2009, you wrote:
>>
>> > Would it make it harder for those sending spam?
>> I was wondering if it would make it harder if spammers got nothing.
>
> How many spammers do you think use a valid return address?
>
> Spammers likely
Gary Frederick:
> >> I was wondering if I could turn off sending messages back when an
> >> email is sent to a non-existent email address. I would want to have
> >> the log record what happened.
> >
> > Fix the right problem, please. A correctly configured Postfix does
> > not accept mail for non-e
Gary Frederick a écrit :
> :-)
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Gary Frederick:
>>> More details
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Gary Frederick
>>> wrote:
I am setting up a server for our mailing lists. That server will not
be used for anything bu
Thanks all. I now understand.
...
>> My postfix sends a message back to the sender that it was to a
>> non-existent address. I was thinking about not sending them anything
>> back. No need to tell them they guessed wrong.
>>
>
> in a good confifguration postfix doesn't _send_. it _rejects_ the
> t
Gary Frederick a écrit :
> Thanks all. I now understand.
>
> ...
>>> My postfix sends a message back to the sender that it was to a
>>> non-existent address. I was thinking about not sending them anything
>>> back. No need to tell them they guessed wrong.
>>>
>> in a good confifguration postfix do
Gilles Albusac a écrit :
> The routing I need, have to depend of the 'from: field' and not the 'to:
> field'.
>
you mean depend on the sender, and not the recipient. "From:" and "To:"
usually refer to headers, which should never be used for routing.
> Are you sure table transport permit that ?
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
secSwami wrote:
Hi,
So after trying and trying other methods of making postfix send emails
for the SASL authenticated users to work, I am trying to now use
dovecot sasl config.
My main purpose is that I should be able to SEND email from anywhere
on the inter
Roland Plüss a écrit :
>
> mouss wrote:
>> Roland Plüss a écrit :
>>
>>> I guess in this case I should once upon time pay Dovecot a visit. I need
>>> only auth for SMTP/IMAP. LMTP I don't use so it's not a blocker there.
>>>
>>>
>> you apparently didn't get it:
>>
>> - if you only need to
Thomas wrote:
secSwami wrote:
Thanks a bunch Thomas!!
One more thing do you create users on the system itself or use users
and password from a file?
Thanks again...much much appreciated.
So far, i only use regular Unix users from /etc/passswd, nothing
virtual ...
Does it work for you?
secSwami a écrit :
>>
>> But did the AUTH succeed?
>> You need to find a line like this:
>> Jan 15 09:10:21 mx1 postfix/smtpd[12595]: NOQUEUE:
>> client=xxx[192.168.123.52], sasl_method=PLAIN, sasl_username=grknight
>>
>> grep for sasl_method and sasl_username
>>
>
> Nope ...I don't see any of
secSwami wrote:
No Thomas, so far NO LUCK at all. It seems that SASL_AUTH is not really
working for me. Wonder how I can troubleshoot that?
Thx.
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#server_test
At least for testing, you should set in main.cf
smtpd_tls_auth_only = no
smtpd_sasl_security_
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 09:45:15PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> Jeff Weinberger a ?crit :
> >
> [snip]> I now have it working, as far as I can tell, as I want. The goal
> was to
> > have a submission service that forces authentication and requires that
> > authenticated users only send from addresses th
* secSwami :
> Thomas wrote:
>> secSwami wrote:
>>> Thanks a bunch Thomas!!
>>>
>>> One more thing do you create users on the system itself or use users
>>> and password from a file?
>>>
>>> Thanks again...much much appreciated.
>>
>> So far, i only use regular Unix users from /etc/passswd, nothi
I do not realy understand the problem here ...
When a mail is send to a remote SMTP server, wrong addresses get
rejected with 550 ...
But that IS of course a Mail that returns to the send - it has the title
"Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" and contains a message like
"Recipient address
Thanks
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Thomas wrote:
> I do not realy understand the problem here ...
>
> When a mail is send to a remote SMTP server, wrong addresses get rejected
> with 550 ...
>
> But that IS of course a Mail that returns to the send - it has the title
> "Undelivered Mail Retu
Thomas wrote:
I do not realy understand the problem here ...
When a mail is send to a remote SMTP server, wrong addresses get
rejected with 550 ...
Right; this is called a reject, not a bounce.
But that IS of course a Mail that returns to the send - it has the title
"Undelivered Mail Return
Thomas:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> I do not realy understand the problem here ...
>
> When a mail is send to a remote SMTP server, wrong addresses get
> rejected with 550 ...
>
> But that IS of course a Mail that returns to the send - it has the title
> "Undelivered Mai
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Morten Wegelbye Nissen wrote:
> On a server I have a installation of postfix 2.5 running for handling
> some outbound mail traffic. It works like a champ, besides when the
> recieptiant is a hotmail or gmail user. For some reason they move mails
> to the spam folder.
Tr
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:28 PM, mouss wrote:
> Gary Frederick a écrit :
>> Thanks all. I now understand.
>>
>> ...
My postfix sends a message back to the sender that it was to a
non-existent address. I was thinking about not sending them anything
back. No need to tell them they gue
Gary Frederick wrote:
No glaring errors in postconf output...
and from the logs
=
Jan 16 09:53:44 ip-97-74-64-229 postfix/smtpd[7714]: connect from
wf-out-1314.google.com[209.85.200.170]
Jan 16 09:53:44 ip-97-74-64-229 postfix/smtpd[7714]: NOQUEUE: reject:
RCPT from wf-out-1314.google.com[2
Wietse Venema wrote:
Accepting mail for a non-existent user and then dropping the bounce
is the wrong solution for the wrong problem.
I will fight tooth and nail against the idiots that encourage such
preposterous configuration.
I know that :)
I was just saying that there ARE numerous mai
Try contacting the postmaster@ -- though I wish you luck as I have never
I think you know that would be hopeless.
received a human response from either hotmail or gmail. You might also
consider having your server listed on the DNSWL. DKIM, too, is reportedly
helpful in pushing mail throug
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Thomas wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Accepting mail for a non-existent user and then dropping the bounce
>> is the wrong solution for the wrong problem.
>>
>> I will fight tooth and nail against the idiots that encourage such
>> preposterous configuration.
>>
>
> I know
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Morten Wegelbye Nissen wrote:
> Hearsayers are only useless inside a court, I'll try to get listet in
> DNSWL (Actually applied for it 6-8 hours ago) - DKIM seams to be more
> timeconsuming, need to read a bit about this stuff.
It's not that time-consuming and is rather t
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Gejo Paul:
>> I want to transfer all the m,ail ques from first server to second server and
>> to deliver the mails from second one.
>
> New box:
>
> Make sure that old box is in mynetworks.
>
> Old box:
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>relayhos
I think, this is going offtopic ...
Also, don´t assume, that i want to do something like this - i just say,
the OP is free to do so.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 09:33:02PM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Gejo Paul:
> >> I want to transfer all the m,ail ques from first server to second server
> >> and
> >> to deliver the mails from second one.
> >
> > New box:
> >
> >
56 matches
Mail list logo
