I've been experimenting with relocated_maps as well as user-specific entries
in transport_maps. They work, but they also terminate the SMTP conversation
with the defined message. In my configuration the sender would never see
that message because the mail is received by the external spam filtering
ma...@satnetcom.com a écrit :
> Hi mouss,
> thank you for advise.
> but i will not use :
> reject_invalid_helo_hostname
> reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname
>
> because a lot of our clients customer or their friend was rejected
> because of their mail server not passed invalid helo hostname and non f
Ville Walveranta wrote:
> So I'm wondering if it would be possible to accept the mail, blackhole it,
> and send a bounce-message to the sender with a "User unknown" message.
> User-specific blackholing seems to be easy to implement, but how about the
> "user unknown" bounce message? I'd like to be
Hi
Why in my maillog i see sometime "last message repeated 3 times"?
Another problem that i see in maillog when i open outlook is:
imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=:::., lip=:::
Dec 13 01:17:17 mail dovecot: IMAP(user): Disconnected in IDLE
Any Ideas???
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, gianluca...@interfree.it wrote:
Hi Why in my maillog i see sometime "last message repeated 3 times"?
Because the message just above that line was repeated 3 times within a
short time, with no other syslogged message in-between. See man 8 syslogd,
or the equivalent for yo
gianluca...@interfree.it a écrit :
> Hi Why in my maillog i see sometime "last message repeated 3 times"?
when syslog receives the same message N times, it shows this instead of
writing the message N times. if the "last message" is a postfix message,
you may show it here. otherwise, it's not a po
The problem is that it doesn't seem to work neither the way mentioned in
the threads nor adding the dns bypass... I've got again 20 of those same
spam shit in my inbox today. It's going on my nerves. Is there no way to
stop this?
Jan P. Kessler wrote:
> Roland Plüss schrieb:
>> I'll try mapping ze
Ville Walveranta wrote:
> I've been experimenting with relocated_maps as well as user-specific entries
> in transport_maps. They work, but they also terminate the SMTP conversation
> with the defined message. In my configuration the sender would never see
> that message because the mail is receive
We run a mail server with virtual domains (mainly there are mailbox
domains).
For a certain things same aliases needed in the each and every virtual
domain in the system. For example, all these domains maintained by same
people, so it is good thing to have each domain's postmaster mapped to
t
Roland Plüss a écrit :
> The problem is that it doesn't seem to work neither the way mentioned in
> the threads nor adding the dns bypass... I've got again 20 of those same
> spam shit in my inbox today. It's going on my nerves. Is there no way to
> stop this?
>
There is no "dns bypass". I did no
--- In post...@yahoogroups.com, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
> jweinbergerhj wrote:
> >>
> >> mysql is a map type not a transport.
> >> It cannot be set in relay_transport.
> >> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relay_transport
> >>
> >> Brian
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Brian, thanks!
> >
> > T
Nikita Kipriyanov wrote:
> We run a mail server with virtual domains (mainly there are mailbox
> domains).
>
> For a certain things same aliases needed in the each and every virtual
> domain in the system. For example, all these domains maintained by same
> people, so it is good thing to hav
Nikita Kipriyanov a écrit :
> We run a mail server with virtual domains (mainly there are mailbox
> domains).
>
> For a certain things same aliases needed in the each and every virtual
> domain in the system. For example, all these domains maintained by same
> people, so it is good thing to have e
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> No, this is backscatter. Do not accept mail that you intend to bounce.
> Relocated maps should be setup on the MX that sits on the border; not
> an internal mail server.
>
Unfortunately I don't control the MX that initially accepts the mai
On 12/13/2008, Ville Walveranta (walvera...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't control the MX that initially accepts the mails
> (beyond accepting/rejecting an email for a specific address).
There are really very, very few situations where you should NOT reject
all mail destined for invalid
Roland Plüss wrote:
The problem is that it doesn't seem to work neither the way mentioned in
the threads nor adding the dns bypass... I've got again 20 of those same
spam shit in my inbox today. It's going on my nerves. Is there no way to
stop this?
Please do not top post. Put your answers bel
Guys,
I am a bit slow on this, I got a client that won't let me change the way
mail working, but they want me to set up SMTP Authentication. How can I
do it so it work without cyrus or dovecot. I question what is the very
simple way of doing. Everything I have seen from goolge to
howtoforge.c
Payne wrote:
Guys,
I am a bit slow on this, I got a client that won't let me change the way
mail working, but they want me to set up SMTP Authentication. How can I
do it so it work without cyrus or dovecot.
That's kind of like telling someone to take the train to Hawaii...
You can't. Postf
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 04:40:08PM -0500, Payne wrote:
> I am a bit slow on this, I got a client that won't let me change the way
> mail working, but they want me to set up SMTP Authentication.
What does "change the way mail working" mean?
> How can I
> do it so it work without cyrus or doveco
jweinbergerhj wrote:
> I"m not completely sure what you mean by:
>
>> transport_maps accepts map definitions.
>> mumble_transport accepts transport definitions that exist in master.cf.
>
> My understanding is that transport_maps is a table of the form:
>
> domain.tldtransport:nexthop
>
> t
When I first wrote began this thread I did it thinking that knowing this
issue, could be helpful.
I didn't expect it to end as a flame war neither did I knew how complex
could be to solve the issue. But it was my first thread on this list,
and probably last. Anyway, its not due to the fact this is
klondike:
> When I first wrote began this thread I did it thinking that knowing this
> issue, could be helpful.
>
> I didn't expect it to end as a flame war neither did I knew how complex
> could be to solve the issue. But it was my first thread on this list,
> and probably last. Anyway, its not d
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 05:14:26AM +0100, klondike wrote:
> When I first wrote began this thread I did it thinking that knowing this
> issue, could be helpful.
If your first post contains the word "bug" in the subject line, expect
to meet resistance. A bit of humility: ask a question, rather than
mouss пишет:
aliases for your own domains. since you are using mysql, let mysql do it
for you:
virtual_alias_maps =
mysql:/etc/postfix/virtual_alias_maps.cf
mysql:/etc/postfix/standard_aliases.cf
and in the latter, use something like:
query = select 'postmas...@example.com'
24 matches
Mail list logo
