Hello,
I am installing a new server with SuSE Linux Enterprise SP2 and want to
use the SuSE mail repository.
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/mail/SLE_10/x86_64/?C=M;O=D
They offer a postfix24-2.4.5-1.1.x86_64.rpm which seems to be quite old
from August 2007 and even unsecur
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Grüner
> Sent: Monday, 8 December 2008 7:16 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: SuSE repository - old postfix ?
>
> Hello,
>
> I am installing a new server with SuSE Linux Enter
> Open SUSE includes more recent posfix rpms (but in the "factory" not
the repos):
http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/x86_64/postfix-2.5.5-6.6.x86_64.rpm
>
http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/i586/postfix-2.5.5-6.5.i586.rpm
>
> Obviously, there may be dependencies
Spahn, Daniel wrote:
My setup is using the defaults, but the connection is so flaky that even pings
don't return consistently. My current setup no longer delivers mail, but I get
lots of timeout errors, and it looks like most messages end up in the defer
queue. Any ideas? This is a highly poli
Sorry, I should've checked the archives first. I've found
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2008-11/0337.html, I'll
come back if necessary.
Please excuse my previous post.
Cheers,
Tobias
Hi
Is it possible to perform a check to see if envelope sender and envelope
recipient are identical (and within a specific domain or, even better,
within a list, e.g. relay_recipients) with postfix check_mumble_access
rules? Following Ralf's hints at www.arschkrebs.de, I can chain sender
and recip
Hello,
how can I have an e-mail account to which when people send e-mail messages then
they are kept in this account and also forwarded to some other accounts?
In other words:
There is an e-mail account [EMAIL PROTECTED] Someone uses this account for
sending / receiving e-mails. But it is require
of transport_maps?
> unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
> unverified_recipient_reject_code = 550
> virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
>
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3671 (20081208) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32
mouss ha scritto:
can you show the contents of transport_maps?
And the content of alias map? As far as I can remember I had a similar
error and IU had made two mistakes:
1) listed in transport the domain and the destination;
2) no alias set in aliases;
And last but not least, there was no o
Greetings,
We run Postfox (postfix-2.3.3-2.pcre.sasl2.rhel4) and MailScanner
(mailscanner-4.66.5-3)
together. A user reported that he lost a message. I checked into our log
and found 4 entries
about the message, all from postfix.
Dec 7 16:04:47 smtp2 postfix/smtpd[12441]: connect from
h129
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 09:23:14AM -0700, Kai Wang wrote:
> We run Postfox (postfix-2.3.3-2.pcre.sasl2.rhel4) and MailScanner
> (mailscanner-4.66.5-3)
> together.
Mailscanner is expressly unsupported here, it misuses undocumented
Postfix interfaces and queue-file formats.
> A user reported that
Kai Wang:
>
> Greetings,
>
> We run Postfox (postfix-2.3.3-2.pcre.sasl2.rhel4) and MailScanner
> (mailscanner-4.66.5-3)
> together. A user reported that he lost a message. I checked into our log
> and found 4 entries
> about the message, all from postfix.
>
> Dec 7 16:04:47 smtp2 postfix/smtp
Hi I have set up my postfix server:
Every SMTP connection from evolution works.
Every SMTP connection from Outlook fails (smtp authentication is marked)
they get 554 5.7.1 : Client host rejected. Access denied.
This is driving me nuts, any help will be grat, thanks in advance
Here are my files:
Hi,
I have a postfix gateway sending mails to accounts on different backend
systems and to local maildirs for imap. But the destination of an email
should depend from the single recipient address not from the complete
destination domain.
I'll try to explain it with my testdomain "example.com
Miguel Angel Cañedo wrote:
Hi I have set up my postfix server:
Every SMTP connection from evolution works.
Every SMTP connection from Outlook fails (smtp authentication is marked)
they get 554 5.7.1 : Client host rejected. Access denied.
This is driving me nuts, any help will be grat, thanks in
Hello:
Over a year ago, I installed a CentOS 5.2 with Postfix
2:2.3..3-2.1 (and Dovecot) on a Server. Postfix ran without a problem & did
not do anything for 18 months.
Couple of weeks ago, I lost the P/S in the Server. I took
the MB and installed it into another Server. I changed the IP addre
Daniel Funke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a postfix gateway sending mails to accounts on different
> backend systems and to local maildirs for imap. But the destination of
> an email should depend from the single recipient address not from the
> complete destination domain.
>
> I'll try to explain it wi
Alexander Grüner wrote:
> > Open SUSE includes more recent posfix rpms (but in the "factory" not
> the repos):
> http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/x86_64/postfix-2.5.5-6.6.x86_64.rpm
>
> >
> http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/i586/postfix-2.5.5-6.5.i586.rpm
>
> >
>
Kirt Bajwa wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
>
>
> Over a year ago, I installed a CentOS 5.2 with Postfix 2:2..3.3-2.1
> (and Dovecot) on a Server. Postfix ran without a problem & did not do
> anything for 18 months.
>
>
>
> Couple of weeks ago, I lost the P/S in the Server. I took the MB and
> installed it
Did you change the MX record to point to the new server?
Do you show anything in the logs, rejections? Did you open your firewall for
the new IP?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirt Bajwa
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 11:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can
El lun, 08-12-2008 a las 11:45 -0600, J.P. Trosclair escribió:
> Miguel Angel Cañedo wrote:
> > Hi I have set up my postfix server:
> > Every SMTP connection from evolution works.
> > Every SMTP connection from Outlook fails (smtp authentication is marked)
> > they get 554 5.7.1 : Client host rejec
My previous post should have said Hard Disk Drive (HDD) instead of Motherboard
(MB). I am reposting. Sorry.
From: Kirt Bajwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2008 10:57:54 AM
Subject: Can't Receive emails!
Hello:
Over a
Hi,
Korreio is a GUI to mail management with support to LDAP, CYRUS and
POSTFIX. It is a free software hosted on http://korreio.sf.net. (Now
available in English)
It has some integrated modules:
- LDAP management to add, modify and delete entries with many
facilities including Password Change an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm a profoundly low-volume mailer, so there's no way I'm cut off for
traffic. And I'm not a spammer.
But spamassassin has been checking with zen for 2 or 3 years now, and
this morning I noticed bind saying it was getting too many timeouts from
spamha
> Can you 'telnet localhost 25' on that box?
YES
> Can you telnet to the box on the same network?
YES
>Is SELinux or AppArmor installed?
SELinux is installed (as part of CentOS installation) but is DISABLED.
>Is there a general smtp service entry in master.cf?
No idea what to look for! Please g
there was no one listening on 127.0.0.1 on port 25.
Hth.
Dario "subbia" Cavallaro
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3671 (20081208) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__
I think the problem is with Qwest DSL blocking the incoming mail. I have reset
the DSL modem and did receive one email. I am hoping that it is working. THANKS
to all.
Mark A. Olbert a écrit :
> Log info:
>
> Dec 8 07:03:23 wiggle_butt postfix/pickup[13057]: 132802741F3: uid=0
> from=
> Dec 8 07:03:23 wiggle_butt postfix/cleanup[13064]: 132802741F3:
> message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Dec 8 07:03:23 wiggle_butt postfix/qmgr[13058]: 132802741F3: from=<[EMAIL
On Mon, December 8, 2008 12:41 pm, Kirt Bajwa wrote:
>> Can you 'telnet localhost 25' on that box?
>>
> YES
>
>
>> Can you telnet to the box on the same network?
>>
> YES
>
>
>
>> Is SELinux or AppArmor installed?
>>
> SELinux is installed (as part of CentOS installation) but is DISABLED.
>
>
>> I
Kirt Bajwa wrote:
My previous post should have said Hard Disk Drive (HDD) instead of
Motherboard (MB). I am reposting. Sorry.
*From:* Kirt Bajwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, December 8, 2008
Hey All,
I'm having an issue with backscatter emails and implementing a
before-queue spam and virus scanner. My current mail server uses a
after-queue amavisd-new scanner with spamassassin and clamav. In the
last two weeks, my system has started *sending* a significant number of
backscatter
Jakub Nadolny a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> how can I have an e-mail account to which when people send e-mail messages
> then
> they are kept in this account and also forwarded to some other accounts?
>
> In other words:
> There is an e-mail account [EMAIL PROTECTED] Someone uses this account for
> sen
ghe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm a profoundly low-volume mailer, so there's no way I'm cut off for
traffic. And I'm not a spammer.
Being cut off from DNS queries is not based on how much you send, but on how
much you use the DNS query service. See
http://www.spamh
Chris Turan wrote:
Hey All,
I'm having an issue with backscatter emails and implementing a
before-queue spam and virus scanner. My current mail server uses a
after-queue amavisd-new scanner with spamassassin and clamav. In the
last two weeks, my system has started *sending* a significant nu
Chris Turan wrote:
Hey All,
I'm having an issue with backscatter emails and implementing a
before-queue spam and virus scanner. My current mail server uses a
after-queue amavisd-new scanner with spamassassin and clamav. In the
last two weeks, my system has started *sending* a significant nu
Hi,
When I try to send mail, I get 5.7.1 Relay access denied. Although I don't get
this when I send mail with mutt, I am
wondering if this is a Postfix issue. If not, can you redirect me?
Regards,
mto
- Original Message
> From: Tolga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2008 8:26:25 PM
> Subject: Relay access denied
>
> Hi,
>
> When I try to send mail, I get 5.7.1 Relay access denied. Although I don't
> get
> this when I send mail with
Tolga wrote:
Hi,
When I try to send mail, I get 5.7.1 Relay access denied. Although I don't get this when I send mail with mutt, I am
wondering if this is a Postfix issue. If not, can you redirect me?
Regards,
mto
Sounds like a postfix configuration issue. Are you using mutt on the
same se
Noel Jones wrote:
You need to configure postfix to reject unknown recipients during SMTP.
Switching to something other than amavisd-new and/or switching to a
before-queue filter won't help that.
Hey Noel. I actually am rejecting unknown recipients. I wrote some
software to refresh the reci
Terry Carmen wrote:
To eliminate *sending* backscatter, all you need to do is not accept
mail you won't be able to deliver:
I am rejecting unknown recipients but the bounces are coming from
messages with a spamassassin score above 12.
Unfortunately, there's still no such thing as a "free lun
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:28:22PM -0800, Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Tolga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Sent: Monday, December 8, 2008 8:26:25 PM
> > Subject: Relay access denied
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > When I try to
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:29:51PM -0600, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
> Tolga wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When I try to send mail, I get 5.7.1 Relay access denied. Although I
>> don't get this when I send mail with mutt, I am wondering if this is a
>> Postfix issue. If not, can you redirect me?
>>
>> Regards,
Tolga wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:29:51PM -0600, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
Tolga wrote:
Hi,
When I try to send mail, I get 5.7.1 Relay access denied. Although I
don't get this when I send mail with mutt, I am wondering if this is a
Postfix issue. If not, can you redirect me?
Regards,
m
I read now the thread in the archive and tried to apply the proposed
solution. I'm still getting the same amount of spam mails where
sender=receiver. My settings look like this:
disable_vrfy_command = yes
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
check_helo_acces
J.P. Trosclair yazmış:
Tolga wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:29:51PM -0600, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
Tolga wrote:
Hi,
When I try to send mail, I get 5.7.1 Relay access denied. Although
I don't get this when I send mail with mutt, I am wondering if this
is a Postfix issue. If not, can you r
Chris Turan wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
You need to configure postfix to reject unknown recipients during
SMTP. Switching to something other than amavisd-new and/or switching
to a before-queue filter won't help that.
Hey Noel. I actually am rejecting unknown recipients. I wrote some
software
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 03:13:57PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> If you want to investigate setting up amavisd-new as a pre-queue filter,
> general instructions are here:
> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html
> More specific instructions can likely be found in the archives of the
> amav
Chris Turan wrote:
Terry Carmen wrote:
To eliminate *sending* backscatter, all you need to do is not accept
mail you won't be able to deliver:
I am rejecting unknown recipients but the bounces are coming from
messages with a spamassassin score above 12.
Don't do that.
Once you've accepted a
Chris Turan wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
amavisd-new meets all your criteria, providing you configure it to
tag+deliver mail rather than bounce.
Well, I also have it set to bounce messages with a spamassassin score
above 12. Turning that off and just delivering everything with
tagging *could*
mail_version = 2.5.5
mail_release_date = 20080902
Last week I worked for some hours to resolve a problem receiving mail from
puremail.com. I have a short term workaround now, but for the long term I
want to understand the problem and obviate the need for the workaround.
The mail from puremail
Michael Brennen:
> The mail from puremail was sent from ip address 66.81.101.50, which reverses
> to 'mx.puremail.com'. A forward lookup on 'mx.puremail.com' results in a
> truncated DNS result and TCP retry, returning 23 ip addresses.
>
> From the remote end's view the 220 return message is de
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Turan
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 7:39 AM
> To: Terry Carmen
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Stopping backscatter with before-queue
>
> Terry Carmen wrote:
> > To eliminate
Bill Cole a écrit :
> ghe wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I'm a profoundly low-volume mailer, so there's no way I'm cut off for
>> traffic. And I'm not a spammer.
>
> Being cut off from DNS queries is not based on how much you send, but on
> how much you use the DN
On Monday 08 December 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Brennen:
> > The mail from puremail was sent from ip address 66.81.101.50, which
> > reverses to 'mx.puremail.com'. A forward lookup on 'mx.puremail.com'
> > results in a truncated DNS result and TCP retry, returning 23 ip
> > addresses.
>
Terry Carmen wrote:
Don't do that. Once you've accepted a message, it's yours. Aside from
anything else, it makes you look bad when someone sends a legitimate
email that happens to "look" spammy and you bounce it back as spam.
Right, I'm trying to correct that problem. This wasn't much of an i
Corey Chandler wrote:
Tough-- you're really creating your own misery here. You MUST either
reject at the gateway, or accept the traffic without sending a
bounce. You can delete silently if you trust your filters, but given
that the vast majority of spam has a forged From: header, you're
inflicti
Chris Turan wrote:
>
> Ouch, but you're right. I am creating my own misery. It wasn't a
> problem before when I was unknown to the spammers. Its only been a
> problem for a few weeks and I haven't yet been put on any blacklists.
Keep sending out backscatter spam, and you will most certainly end
J Sloan wrote:
Keep sending out backscatter spam, and you will most certainly end up on
blacklists.
I think you might have misread my intention. I definitely don't want to
continue sending backscatter. Per another suggestion on the list, I
made a change that stopped all of my backscatter sp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Grüner さんは書きました:
| Hello,
|
| I am installing a new server with SuSE Linux Enterprise SP2 and want to
| use the SuSE mail repository.
|
|
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/mail/SLE_10/x86_64/?C=M;O=D
|
|
| They offer a postf
Chris Turan wrote:
Terry Carmen wrote:
Don't do that. Once you've accepted a message, it's yours. Aside from
anything else, it makes you look bad when someone sends a legitimate
email that happens to "look" spammy and you bounce it back as spam.
Right, I'm trying to correct that problem. This
60 matches
Mail list logo
