Eddie b wrote:
Hello, Well firstly, I hope my postfix experience is going to better than
the pathetic ancient mailing list server that took 3 attempts with gmail in
subscriber confirmations...
Anyways... I am looking at replacing our outdated Qmail/ Vpopmail system,
I've read the docs and it see
Alan Hicks wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:57:51 +0200
"Marcel Grandemange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Im looking for a programme that can run in daemon mode and watch one
of my mbox male files.
male??? :)
The idea I have is I would like to have the ability to send a email
to one of my addre
On Friday, August 29, 2008 at 20:13 CEST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you, but the lest time I tried using check_sender_access I ran
> into trouble.
How so?
> Would it be possible to force domain verification on a per domain
> basis, where the domain I want verified would be contained
On Friday, August 29, 2008 at 20:15 CEST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Do not start new topics by replying to old messages in old and
> > unrelated threads. Do use the "compose new message" feature of
> > your MUA.
>
> By the way, how did you catch this?
Decent MUAs display the threads as t
Hello list,
In the moment our mailtraffic is handled by four mailgateways which are
reachable through one round-robin dns-mx record. Each gateway runs postfix,
amavisd, spamassassin and clamav. The four gateways handle 2.8 millions
connections a day.
My employee likes to replace the gateways wi
Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> 3) Keep the actual server organisation: 4 servers with postfix,
> amavisd, spamassassin, clamav.
> Advantage: Known configuration, easy to extend
> Disadvantage: problem with loadbalancing
This is the option I would choose. What is the load-balancing problems
you're having
I'm using postfix 2.5.4.
When I read the following in the log:
postfix1/smtp[18518]: 4AD0517085: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
relay=myserver[myipaddr]:25, conn_use=4, delay=7.8,
delays=7.6/0/0.03/0.08, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
F3241EDAA)
I tend to think that _one_ email has bee
* Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm using postfix 2.5.4.
>
> When I read the following in the log:
>
> postfix1/smtp[18518]: 4AD0517085: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> relay=myserver[myipaddr]:25, conn_use=4, delay=7.8,
> delays=7.6/0/0.03/0.08, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
> F3
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I'm using postfix 2.5.4.
>>
>> When I read the following in the log:
>>
>> postfix1/smtp[18518]: 4AD0517085: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> relay=myserver[myipaddr]:25, conn_use=4, delay=7.8,
>> delays=7.6/0/0.03/0.08, dsn=2.0.0, status=
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 09:39 -1000, Camron W. Fox wrote:
> Noel Jones wrote:
> > Camron W. Fox wrote:
> >> Alle,
> >>
> >> We would like to filter all internal email so that it bypasses
> >> SpamAssassin. We have set up per_client_filters using:
> >>
> >> smtpd_client_restrictions =
> >> ch
* Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Aug 30 10:49:24 postfix1/smtp[18518]:
> Aug 30 10:49:52 postfix1/smtp[18518]:
> Aug 30 10:49:53 postfix1/smtp[18518]: conn_use=2,
> Aug 30 10:49:54 postfix1/smtp[18518]: conn_use=4,
> Aug 30 10:49:55 postfix1/smtp[18518]: conn_use=6,
> Aug 30 10:49:56 postfix1
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Odd, it works here:
>
> # fgrep "postfix/smtp[12851]" /var/log/mail.log| awk '{print $9}'
> delay=0.74,
> conn_use=2,
> conn_use=3,
> delay=0.18,
> conn_use=4,
> conn_use=5,
I've got more:
fgrep "postfix1/smtp[29938]" /var/log/mail | awk '{print
$1" "$2" "$3" "$9}'
Au
When Postfix reuses an SMTP connection, it may actually be reused
in a different SMTP client process. This maximizes reuse and
minimizes the time that a connection sits idle.
This is different from Sendmail or Exim, where a connection can be
reused only in the process that creates that connection.
Wietse Venema wrote:
> When Postfix reuses an SMTP connection, it may actually be reused
> in a different SMTP client process. This maximizes reuse and
> minimizes the time that a connection sits idle.
>
> This is different from Sendmail or Exim, where a connection can be
> reused only in the pro
Per Jessen:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > When Postfix reuses an SMTP connection, it may actually be reused
> > in a different SMTP client process. This maximizes reuse and
> > minimizes the time that a connection sits idle.
> >
> > This is different from Sendmail or Exim, where a connection can b
Rich Shepard wrote:
I just ran testsaslauthd for my wife's account from the server:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# testsaslauthd -u pamela -p
0: OK "Success."
You're testing this while running as root - you need to test this
running as the system user that ultimately will be used to run postfix.
Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Whilst on the subject of connection caching, I assume postfix will
>> (have
>> to) do a RSET between each reuse of a connection? (just a sanity
>> check on my part).
>
> Of course. See http://www.postfix.org/CONNECTION_CACHE_README.html
>
> Wietse
One more question then
Eddie b wrote:
[snip]
I know I can configure it the way I want writing perl scripts to split off,
using say the first and then second chars of users login name using
postfix's internal virtual, but using dovecot gives me greater flexibility
dovecot LDA is useful if you want to use its sieve fea
Stefan Palme wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 09:39 -1000, Camron W. Fox wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
Camron W. Fox wrote:
Alle,
We would like to filter all internal email so that it bypasses
SpamAssassin. We have set up per_client_filters using:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_client_ac
Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Friday, August 29, 2008 at 20:15 CEST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do not start new topics by replying to old messages in old and
unrelated threads. Do use the "compose new message" feature of
your MUA.
By the way, how did you catch this?
Decent MUAs display the threa
gishaust wrote:
hi everyone,
I have been working on putting postfix email server on unbuntu 8.04
server and after a very steep learn curve think I am ready to go online.
But I don't know if it is secure so below is what i have done. I need to
know if I have missed anything. So does anyone hav
Per Jessen:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> >> Whilst on the subject of connection caching, I assume postfix will
> >> (have
> >> to) do a RSET between each reuse of a connection? (just a sanity
> >> check on my part).
> >
> > Of course. See http://www.pos
Hi,
Running 2 servers, different locations geographically. I'd like to have
them both store emails for a domain locally, and transfer them between
each other. The virtual_alias_maps/domains are stored in a mysql db
thats already being replicated. Mainly I just need a configuration that
if
Matthew Crowe:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi,
>
> Running 2 servers, different locations geographically. I'd like to have
> them both store emails for a domain locally, and transfer them between
> each other. The virtual_alias_maps/domains are stored in a mysql db
> t
Hi,
I have a postfix+amavisd-new+spamassassin+clamav mail server which is
configured to store virus mail on a quarantine folder as standard
configuration. Ok, it's a good way but I have just a few questions
about quarantine strategy :
How end-users can manage their quaratined message with
Pierre Malard wrote:
Hi,
I have a postfix+amavisd-new+spamassassin+clamav mail server which is
configured to store virus mail on a quarantine folder as standard
configuration. Ok, it's a good way but I have just a few questions about
quarantine strategy :
How end-users can manage their quar
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Graham Leggett wrote:
You're testing this while running as root - you need to test this running
as the system user that ultimately will be used to run postfix.
Graham, Wietse, Noel, mouss:
I turned off SASL authorization and returned to the status we had for
years. Sinc
Stefan Jakobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) Keep the actual server organisation: 4 servers with postfix,
> amavisd, spamassassin, clamav.
> Advantage: Known configuration, easy to extend
> Disadvantage: problem with loadbalancing
Would you describe the problem you're having with load balancing
I have searched the web for the difference between defer and deferred
without any luck.
I have several machines with different versions of postfix that have old
emails in the defer directory. Are those old emails safe to delete? One
machine has files in that directory over a year old and the o
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:48 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> dovecot LDA is useful if you want to use its sieve features.
>
Yes we are hoping to , so we can move spam to a junk folder for them and so
on.
>
>
> select concat('/var/Mail/', %d, '/' , substring(%u, 1, 1), '/',
>sub
Francisco Reyes:
> I have searched the web for the difference between defer and deferred
> without any luck.
When everything fails, read the documentation.
If you type "defer" into the search window at http://www.postfix.org/,
the defer directory is explained in the first paragraph of the
first
Eddie b wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:48 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
dovecot LDA is useful if you want to use its sieve features.
Yes we are hoping to , so we can move spam to a junk folder for them and so
on.
select concat('/var/Mail/', %d, '/' , substring(%u, 1, 1), '/',
LuKreme wrote:
On 21-Aug-2008, at 11:26, mouss wrote:
Erm... at least that was in postfix22, not sure if it's in 2.5.x
That's the third-party spf patch. It's still available in the ports.
I don't see it. must be an old ports tree?
# cd /usr/ports/mail/postfix; make config
33 matches
Mail list logo
