On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:55:28PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 11/19/2010 05:56 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
>> I did say "fixed by running postfix-install", wasn't clear that
>> postfix-install fixed postfix fail-to-run problem.
>>
>> fsck or whatever Linux RH does to fix filesystems apparently c
On 11/19/2010 05:56 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
I did say "fixed by running postfix-install", wasn't clear that postfix-install
fixed postfix fail-to-run problem.
fsck or whatever Linux RH does to fix filesystems apparently converted "private/scan="
socket to "private/scan" dir, into which we got 21
Len Conrad wrote:
Len Conrad:
At 09:12 AM 11/19/2010, you wrote:
Len Conrad:
The scan dir ownership was fixed by running postfix-install. not
sure how another guy detected that scan was bad ownership, since
that finding was not logged after I moved the scan/* msgs out.
I've moved the 2176 ms
Len Conrad:
> I did say "fixed by running postfix-install", wasn't clear that
> postfix-install fixed postfix fail-to-run problem.
For the record, I take no responsibility for what happens when
Postfix is run on a corrupted file system. Just like I take no
responsibility for what happens when Post
>Len Conrad:
>> At 09:12 AM 11/19/2010, you wrote:
>> >Len Conrad:
>> >> The scan dir ownership was fixed by running postfix-install. not
>> >> sure how another guy detected that scan was bad ownership, since
>> >> that finding was not logged after I moved the scan/* msgs out.
>> >>
>> >> I've mo
Len Conrad:
> At 09:12 AM 11/19/2010, you wrote:
> >Len Conrad:
> >> The scan dir ownership was fixed by running postfix-install. not
> >> sure how another guy detected that scan was bad ownership, since
> >> that finding was not logged after I moved the scan/* msgs out.
> >>
> >> I've moved the 2
At 09:12 AM 11/19/2010, you wrote:
>Len Conrad:
>> The scan dir ownership was fixed by running postfix-install. not
>> sure how another guy detected that scan was bad ownership, since
>> that finding was not logged after I moved the scan/* msgs out.
>>
>> I've moved the 2176 msgs back to scan and
Len Conrad:
> The scan dir ownership was fixed by running postfix-install. not
> sure how another guy detected that scan was bad ownership, since
> that finding was not logged after I moved the scan/* msgs out.
>
> I've moved the 2176 msgs back to scan and set them to postfix:wheel,
> but there th
At 06:09 AM 11/19/2010, you wrote:
>Len Conrad:
>>
>> Had a power failure on a linux RHEL and postfix. disk got messed up a
>> little bit but linux seemed to fix it up. all apps and services are running
>> except postfix.
>>
>> I've had this problem before on another machine, and it was permi
Len Conrad:
>
> Had a power failure on a linux RHEL and postfix. disk got messed up a little
> bit but linux seemed to fix it up. all apps and services are running except
> postfix.
>
> I've had this problem before on another machine, and it was permissions.
>
> postfix set-permissions
>
Had a power failure on a linux RHEL and postfix. disk got messed up a little
bit but linux seemed to fix it up. all apps and services are running except
postfix.
I've had this problem before on another machine, and it was permissions.
postfix set-permissions
... doesn't solve it
postfix
11 matches
Mail list logo
