Re: not logging to syslog

2012-07-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Leo Baltus: > Op 10/07/2012 om 06:55:43 -0400, schreef Wietse Venema: > > Leo Baltus: > > > It would be nice if postfix could jut open a logfile and reopen on a > > > signal like any other daemon does. > > > > Sending sighup to sendmail, postsuper, postqueue, etc. would not > > be productive. > >

Re: not logging to syslog

2012-07-10 Thread Scott Lambert
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:32:39AM +0200, Leo Baltus wrote: > Op 09/07/2012 om 13:52:04 -0400, schreef Wietse Venema: > > Leo Baltus: > > > I would like postfix to not log to the default syslog-daemon to > > > have better control over where each specific postfix instance logs to. I > > > am running

Re: not logging to syslog

2012-07-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 10.07.2012 14:30, schrieb Leo Baltus: > Op 10/07/2012 om 06:55:43 -0400, schreef Wietse Venema: >> Leo Baltus: >>> It would be nice if postfix could jut open a logfile and reopen on a >>> signal like any other daemon does. >> >> Sending sighup to sendmail, postsuper, postqueue, etc. would not

Re: not logging to syslog

2012-07-10 Thread Leo Baltus
Op 10/07/2012 om 06:55:43 -0400, schreef Wietse Venema: > Leo Baltus: > > It would be nice if postfix could jut open a logfile and reopen on a > > signal like any other daemon does. > > Sending sighup to sendmail, postsuper, postqueue, etc. would not > be productive. > Postfix could have its own

Re: not logging to syslog

2012-07-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Leo Baltus: > It would be nice if postfix could jut open a logfile and reopen on a > signal like any other daemon does. Sending sighup to sendmail, postsuper, postqueue, etc. would not be productive. Wietse

Re: not logging to syslog

2012-07-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 10.07.2012 10:32, schrieb Leo Baltus: > Op 09/07/2012 om 13:52:04 -0400, schreef Wietse Venema: >> Leo Baltus: >>> I would like postfix to not log to the default syslog-daemon to >>> have better control over where each specific postfix instance logs to. I >>> am running multiple instances on a

Re: not logging to syslog

2012-07-10 Thread Leo Baltus
Op 09/07/2012 om 13:52:04 -0400, schreef Wietse Venema: > Leo Baltus: > > I would like postfix to not log to the default syslog-daemon to > > have better control over where each specific postfix instance logs to. I > > am running multiple instances on a server. > > Postfix has syslog_facility to s

Re: not logging to syslog

2012-07-09 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.07.2012 19:52, schrieb Wietse Venema: > Leo Baltus: >> Hi, >> >> I would like postfix to not log to the default syslog-daemon to >> have better control over where each specific postfix instance logs to. I >> am running multiple instances on a server. > > Postfix has syslog_facility to spli

Re: not logging to syslog

2012-07-09 Thread Wietse Venema
Leo Baltus: > Hi, > > I would like postfix to not log to the default syslog-daemon to > have better control over where each specific postfix instance logs to. I > am running multiple instances on a server. Postfix has syslog_facility to split different syslog streams. Otherwise propose a new sys

not logging to syslog

2012-07-09 Thread Leo Baltus
Hi, I would like postfix to not log to the default syslog-daemon to have better control over where each specific postfix instance logs to. I am running multiple instances on a server. Postfix only knows about logging to syslog which is unfortunate, although I have read that someday postfix will c