that's not the case. Postfix does not log client "syntax"
errors and sending "RCPT TO" once "MAIL FROM" is rejected "RCPT TO"
is a "50x" syntax error:
MAIL FROM:<...> SIZE=1234567890
552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds fixed limit
Thanks all!!!
digging it
Pete.
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 09:45:03 PM GMT+2, Wietse Venema via
Postfix-users wrote:
If no-one else posts one, I can post a solution that:
- relies on smtpd_delay_reject=yes to postpone check_policy lookup
until RCPT TO.
- disables the SIZE announcem
If no-one else posts one, I can post a solution that:
- relies on smtpd_delay_reject=yes to postpone check_policy lookup
until RCPT TO.
- disables the SIZE announcement in EHLO
- diusables the SIZE check in MAIL FROM
- calls check_policy to let postfwd (etc.) reject mail, but that
only works fo
that's not the case. Postfix does not log client "syntax"
errors and sending "RCPT TO" once "MAIL FROM" is rejected "RCPT TO"
is a "50x" syntax error:
MAIL FROM:<...> SIZE=1234567890
552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds fixed limit
uot;syntax"
errors and sending "RCPT TO" once "MAIL FROM" is rejected "RCPT TO"
is a "50x" syntax error:
MAIL FROM:<...> SIZE=1234567890
552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds fixed limit
RCPT TO:<...>
503 5.5.1 Error: need MAIL com
reject that email
> > after the RCPTO TO?
>
>http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_delay_reject
Rejection of "MAIL FROM:" when the advertised estimated message size
exceeds limits is not subject to "smtpd_delay_reject", which covers
access(5) checks, but not th
Currently Postfix do not show in log the Recipient of emails that exceed
Meesage_size_limit becasue MAIL FROM comes before RCPTO TO... but
is there any nice way of forcing Postfix to reject that email after the RCPTO
TO?
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_delay_reject
___
-}/ REJECT Message size is over limit
but i am concerned about performance!
Any feedback, please?
Thanks!
Pete.___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 05:27:09PM +, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> Is your attachment file exactly 7MB or a bit bigger? Encoding as Base64
> (to attach to an email) increases its size by c.37%.
> 1024/1.37=7.13MB. Any attachment bigger than this will hit your
> message_size_limit.
Base64 en
On 09/02/2022 16:53, Gary Aitken wrote:
Just got the message
smtp; 552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds fixed limit
when attempting to receive a 7MB file:
$ postconf -d | grep size_limit
body_checks_size_limit = 51200
bounce_size_limit = 5
header_size_limit = 102400
mailbox_size_limit
Just got the message
smtp; 552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds fixed limit
when attempting to receive a 7MB file:
$ postconf -d | grep size_limit
body_checks_size_limit = 51200
bounce_size_limit = 5
header_size_limit = 102400
mailbox_size_limit = 5120
message_size_limit = 1024
this value for special recipient ?
>>>> like al...@domain.ldt - "message_size_limit = 1468006"
>>> You can call postfwd from smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions to reject
>>> message sizes selectively. If you call postfwd earlier then Postfix
>>> does not know the real m
s any sollutions to change this value for special recipient ?
> >> like al...@domain.ldt - "message_size_limit = 1468006"
> > You can call postfwd from smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions to reject
> > message sizes selectively. If you call postfwd earlier then Postfix
> >
sage_size_limit = 1468006"
You can call postfwd from smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions to reject
message sizes selectively. If you call postfwd earlier then Postfix
does not know the real message size; Postfix knows only what the
client says in the MAIL FROM command.
Wietse
probab
smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions to reject
> message sizes selectively. If you call postfwd earlier then Postfix
> does not know the real message size; Postfix knows only what the
> client says in the MAIL FROM command.
>
> Wietse
>
>> probably not impossible in postfix but meybe "work around" like postfwd
>> or something ?
>>
>> --
>>
>>
--
estrictions to reject
message sizes selectively. If you call postfwd earlier then Postfix
does not know the real message size; Postfix knows only what the
client says in the MAIL FROM command.
Wietse
> probably not impossible in postfix but meybe "work around" like postfwd
> or something ?
>
> --
>
>
Hi
Server is only for incommin. I have a "message_size_limit = 146800640"
Is any sollutions to change this value for special recipient ?
like al...@domain.ldt - "message_size_limit = 1468006"
probably not impossible in postfix but meybe "work around" like postfwd
or something ?
--
t; narrow use-cases.
I think that this narrow problem can/should be solved with a
combination of smtp_delivery_status_filter that changes 5XX message
size errors into 4XX, plus an smtp_fallback_relay with more generous
size limits.
Or just use that fallback relay all the time.
Wuetse
d
>>>> when the outgoing message exceeds that size, it will be bounced.
>>>>
>>>> Any tips for filters or tools that would help me define another
>>>> relayhost based on the outgoing message size would be greatly
>>>> appreciated!
>>
On 16 Jan 2021, at 02:48, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Since the queue manager has no mechanism for size-dependent selection of
> a default transport
Postfix does, however, know the size of the message based if it is over or
under the message_size_limit, and it must know that before the message hits
ll be bounced.
> > >
> > > Any tips for filters or tools that would help me define another
> > > relayhost based on the outgoing message size would be greatly
> > > appreciated!
> >
> > Since the queue manager has no mechanism for size-dependent sel
ools that would help me define another
> > relayhost based on the outgoing message size would be greatly
> > appreciated!
>
> Since the queue manager has no mechanism for size-dependent selection of
> a default transport (with the help of trivial-rewrite), the only way
>
size
> (this includes images and attachments that are part of the message), and
> when the outgoing message exceeds that size, it will be bounced.
>
> Any tips for filters or tools that would help me define another
> relayhost based on the outgoing message size would be greatly
&g
ssage), and
when the outgoing message exceeds that size, it will be bounced.
Any tips for filters or tools that would help me define another
relayhost based on the outgoing message size would be greatly
appreciated!
Alex
d also
> >> address that.
> >
> > I asked about that some years ago and Wietse told me that it is
> > intentionally not documented:
> >> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/value-of-zero-not-documented-for-message-size-limit-td66874.html
>
o and Wietse told me that it is
intentionally not documented:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/value-of-zero-not-documented-for-message-size-limit-td66874.html
I just had this come up in the IRC chat room. It is becoming apparent
that even though message_size_limit=0 has undocum
On 19 Mar 2019, at 13:00, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Note that, perhaps unintentionally, the treatment of "message_size_limit
> = 0" is not documented to mean "no limit". Perhaps we should also
> address that.
By forbidding a setting of 0?
--
'They're the cream!' Rincewind sighed. 'Cohen, they
intentionally not documented:
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/value-of-zero-not-documented-for-message-size-limit-td66874.html
--
Regards
mks
_limit > 0` that in other places enables `0`
> > to mean "no limit", and thus it enforces a limit of 0 with my
> > config :(
> >
> >> state->error_mask |= MAIL_ERROR_POLICY;
> >> msg_warn("%s: BDAT request from %s exceeds message s
f (state->act_size > var_message_limit - chunk_size) {
> +if (var_message_limit > 0
> + && state->act_size > var_message_limit - chunk_size) {
> state->error_mask |= MAIL_ERROR_POLICY;
> msg_warn("%s: BDAT request from %s excee
OKEN *argv)
}
}
/* Block too large chunks. */
-if (state->act_size > var_message_limit - chunk_size) {
+if (var_message_limit > 0
+ && state->act_size > var_message_limit - chunk_size) {
state->error_mask |= MAIL_ERROR_POLICY;
msg_warn(&q
state->error_mask |= MAIL_ERROR_POLICY;
>> msg_warn("%s: BDAT request from %s exceeds message size
>> limit", state->queue_id ? state->queue_id : "NOQUEUE",
>> state->namaddr);
>> return skip_bdat(state, chunk_size, final_chunk,
>> "552 5.3.4 Chunk exceeds message size
>> limit"); }
>
> - T.
>
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:45:50 + (UTC)
Thorben Thuermer wrote:
> i am running postfix 3.4.1-1 (from debian sid).
>
> i recently noticed that mails from multiple senders (most importantly
> google mail) are being rejected with:
> > 552 5.3.4 Chunk exceeds message size limit
Hello,
i am running postfix 3.4.1-1 (from debian sid).
i recently noticed that mails from multiple senders (most importantly google
mail)
are being rejected with:
> 552 5.3.4 Chunk exceeds message size limit
postfix logs:
> Mar 19 17:42:48 ngs postfix/smtpd[22671]: warning: 25E74C1
In een bericht van 14-9-2016 5:11:
By "message" do you mean an actual piece of email reporting the problem
or a notification in the Thunderbird user interface?
I mean indeed by Thunderbird.
Email messages reporting a delivery failure are almost always generated
by some MTA, e.g. Postfix. The
r that
their message was too big. If a message is rejected later by a policy
server or milter that imposes more complex rules regarding message size,
the client should pass back to the user whatever rejection reply Postfix
passed along from that external program. For example, I use code run via
t
In een bericht van 13-9-2016 15:55:
Usually the sender will disconnect when they see your SIZE banner,
so you never have an opportunity to send them anything. All you'll
see in your logs is a connect/disconnect.
With Thunderbird I sometimes do see a message that attachments are
oversized. Wh
On 9/13/2016 8:39 AM, JosC wrote:
> Is it possible to return a message to someone who wants to attach
> files that pass my message_size_limit?
>
> Thanks,
> Jos Chrispijn
>
Usually the sender will disconnect when they see your SIZE banner,
so you never have an opportunity to send them anything.
Is it possible to return a message to someone who wants to attach files
that pass my message_size_limit?
Thanks,
Jos Chrispijn
Hi Bill,
Shameful admission : I didn't realise that a sending machine using EHLO
could declare the message size in the 'Mail from:'.
I have been able to replicate the log behaviour using Telnet using an
example in RFC1870.
After issuing a EHLO command;
>> mail from:
[google ignoring SIZE in EHLO response]
I believe that initially Postfix has done that as well, because the
number as announced might not be parseable with system library
routines (for example bigger than 4GB, at a time that Postfix
typically ran on 32-bit systems).
Later, Postfix got its own off
On 20 Jun 2016, at 20:54, Mick wrote:
I take it from your response (and noting the log 'reject: MAIL from')
that the sender just piled in over 10MB of data at the 'mail from:'
stage.
Unlikely, since it was a Google machine and that's not how size
restriction works. In this case the session s
e intended behaviour. I'm running Debianized Postfix 3.1.0.
Log excerpt;
Jun 20 03:53:34 skin P25/smtpd[13887]: connect from
mail-it0-x22b.google.com[2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b]
Jun 20 03:53:35 skin P25/smtpd[13887]: NOQUEUE: reject: MAIL from
mail-it0-x22b.google.com[2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b]: 452 4.3
#x27;m running Debianized Postfix 3.1.0.
>
> Log excerpt;
> Jun 20 03:53:34 skin P25/smtpd[13887]: connect from
> mail-it0-x22b.google.com[2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b]
> Jun 20 03:53:35 skin P25/smtpd[13887]: NOQUEUE: reject: MAIL from
> mail-it0-x22b.google.com[2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::
.
Log excerpt;
Jun 20 03:53:34 skin P25/smtpd[13887]: connect from
mail-it0-x22b.google.com[2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b]
Jun 20 03:53:35 skin P25/smtpd[13887]: NOQUEUE: reject: MAIL from
mail-it0-x22b.google.com[2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b]: 452 4.3.4 Message
size exceeds fixed limit; proto=ESMTP helo=
n MSA and mailstore front-end MTA that
are not the same as your Internet-facing inbound gateway. This
allows a larger message size for purely internal email.
You can also operate separate inbound and outbound MTAs (or just
Postfix instances) with separate message size limits, if it somehow
makes
Looking at message_size_limit and mailbox_size_limit, if I want to allow
internal users the ability to send 100M emails it seems like 1) applies to all
messages both in-bound and out-bound and 2) I'll need to increase
mailbox_size_limit to what factor of message_size_limit?
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:01:27PM +0200, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
> Claus Assmann wrote:
> >> With SMTP there is no per-recipiet end-of-data reply, and a
> >> reject reply will block mail for all recipients.
> >
> > AFAICT PRDR can do that -- it's implemented in exim and some other MTA.
> > Howe
Claus Assmann wrote:
>> With SMTP there is no per-recipiet end-of-data reply, and a
>> reject reply will block mail for all recipients.
>
> AFAICT PRDR can do that -- it's implemented in exim and some other MTA.
> However, it's barely used...
One way to "encourage" its implementation would be to
Claus Assmann:
> > With SMTP there is no per-recipiet end-of-data reply, and a
> > reject reply will block mail for all recipients.
>
> AFAICT PRDR can do that -- it's implemented in exim and some other MTA.
> However, it's barely used...
It's a chicken and egg thing; if enough systems implement
> With SMTP there is no per-recipiet end-of-data reply, and a
> reject reply will block mail for all recipients.
AFAICT PRDR can do that -- it's implemented in exim and some other MTA.
However, it's barely used...
> needs to inspect all the recipients. Ditto if it wants to permit
> provided *some* recipient's quota is not exceeded.
Look up the quota at "RCPT TO" time, and remember the smallest.
Enforce the quota at "end of data" time, when the actual message
size is known
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:44:47PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:54:56PM +0200, Alexandre Ellert wrote:
> >
> > > > Le 22 ao?t 2015 ? 15:46, Viktor Dukhovni a
> > > > ?crit :
> > > >
> > > > Is the policy service check in "smtpd_recipient_restrict
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:54:56PM +0200, Alexandre Ellert wrote:
>
> > > Le 22 ao?t 2015 ? 15:46, Viktor Dukhovni a
> > > ?crit :
> > >
> > > Is the policy service check in "smtpd_recipient_restrictions", in
> > > "smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions" or both?
> > The policy serv
ns" or both?
> The policy server is called at smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions stage.
At that stage you don't know who the recipients are (if there's
more than one). You need a policy service that is called for each
recipient and then finally at end of data.
> > The message size is not alway
> Le 22 août 2015 à 15:46, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit
> :
>
> Is the policy service check in "smtpd_recipient_restrictions", in
> "smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions" or both?
The policy server is called at smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions stage.
> The messag
ostfix uses the SIZE
information sent by the remote SMTP client. Postfix knows the true
message size only after the remote SMTP client sends "end-of-data".
This SMTP protocol stage does not have per-recipient replies, so a
REJECT reply would block the message for all recipients.
Wietse
ain and the size attribute is over 10 MB, then return a 5xx error.
> In most case, it works but sometime it doesn't and I don't understand why
> and how to debug?
The message size is not always known at "RCPT TO" time, the real
size is known only at "end of data"
Hello,
I have two Postfix inbound servers which serve multiple domain and I'd like to
accept 20 Mb email for all domain except one (I want 10 Mb limit for this one).
In main.cf I set message_size_limit = 20971520 and I use a policy server
(postfwd) to check the recipient and the mail size.
I con
Enabling debug for the Servers IP, here comes.
Aug 5 15:22:35 intsrv025 postfix/smtpd[1412]: >
SERVER_HOST[SERVER_IP]: 250-ERLAY_HOST
Aug 5 15:22:35 intsrv025 postfix/smtpd[1412]: >
SERVER_HOST[SERVER_IP]: 250-PIPELINING
Aug 5 15:22:35 intsrv025 postfix/smtpd[1412]: >
SERVER_HOST[SERVER_IP]: 25
On 05.08.2014 20:08, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/5/2014 12:53 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
>> 2014-08-05 14:47 GMT-03:00 Noel Jones :
>>> On 8/5/2014 12:23 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> This postfix act as a Relay.
>>
On 8/5/2014 12:53 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> 2014-08-05 14:47 GMT-03:00 Noel Jones :
>> On 8/5/2014 12:23 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> This postfix act as a Relay.
>>> From all servers, but one, the message size is 20M
On 8/5/14, 1:42 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> 2014-08-05 14:37 GMT-03:00 Glenn Sieb :
>> And was that command run on the relay that is showing SIZE 1000?
>
> The command is from the Server -> Relay. So, yes.
> All other servers (40 or so) the result is the same: 20MB.
>
>>
>> If so, did yo
On 8/5/14, 1:47 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> And this doesn't look like postfix. Either there's some sort of
> proxy interfering with SMTP, or this isn't connecting to the same
> server. Maybe some security software or firewall on the oddball server?
Good point.. I missed the difference in responses
2014-08-05 14:47 GMT-03:00 Noel Jones :
> On 8/5/2014 12:23 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> This postfix act as a Relay.
>> From all servers, but one, the message size is 20MB. For these one it's 10MB
>>
>> # postconf message_size_limit
>&
On 8/5/2014 12:23 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This postfix act as a Relay.
> From all servers, but one, the message size is 20MB. For these one it's 10MB
>
> # postconf message_size_limit
> message_size_limit = 20971520
>
>
> Here is t
On 8/5/14, 1:23 PM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> This postfix act as a Relay.
> From all servers, but one, the message size is 20MB. For these one it's 10MB
>
> # postconf message_size_limit
> message_size_limit = 20971520
And was that command run on the relay that is showin
Hi!
This postfix act as a Relay.
>From all servers, but one, the message size is 20MB. For these one it's 10MB
# postconf message_size_limit
message_size_limit = 20971520
Here is the telnet response from all servers
# telnet relay 25
Trying XXX...
Connected to XXX.
Escape char
On 1/23/2013 6:22 AM, Antonio Tommasi wrote:
> Hi to all
> i need to block email if the number of recipients is greater than a specific
> number and message size exceeds fixed limit.
> In main.cf i can configure message_size_limit and smtpd_recipient_limit, but
> i want to re
Hi,
as always, postfwd might be the answer.
-nik
Antonio Tommasi schrieb:
>Hi to all
>i need to block email if the number of recipients is greater than a
>specific number and message size exceeds fixed limit.
>In main.cf i can configure message_size_limit and
>smtpd_recipie
Hi to all
i need to block email if the number of recipients is greater than a specific
number and message size exceeds fixed limit.
In main.cf i can configure message_size_limit and smtpd_recipient_limit, but i
want to reject email only
if (message_size > message_size_limit)
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 07:58 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 8/6/2011 1:26 AM, Rob Sterenborg (Lists) wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 01:04 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> Or do the smart thing: use a file transfer protocol for transferring
> >> files instead of an email protocol. HTTP and FTP
On 8/6/2011 1:26 AM, Rob Sterenborg (Lists) wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 01:04 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Or do the smart thing: use a file transfer protocol for transferring
>> files instead of an email protocol. HTTP and FTP are readily available
>> good examples.
>
> We don't know why t
On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 01:04 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Or do the smart thing: use a file transfer protocol for transferring
> files instead of an email protocol. HTTP and FTP are readily available
> good examples.
We don't know why the OP wants this so it may not be that simple.
Recently I h
On 8/5/2011 9:12 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Friday, August 05, 2011 at 15:37 CEST,
> Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
>> A quick question: message_size_limit refers to the MIME-encoded
>> (base64) "final" message size or to the initial (non-encoded) size
>> of m
On 5/8/2011 5:12 μμ, Magnus Bäck wrote:
A quick question: message_size_limit refers to the MIME-encoded
(base64) "final" message size or to the initial (non-encoded) size
of message + attachments?
The former. That's the only representation of an email that's ever sent
or st
On Friday, August 05, 2011 at 15:37 CEST,
Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> A quick question: message_size_limit refers to the MIME-encoded
> (base64) "final" message size or to the initial (non-encoded) size
> of message + attachments?
The former. That's the only represent
Hi everyone,
A quick question: message_size_limit refers to the MIME-encoded (base64)
"final" message size or to the initial (non-encoded) size of message +
attachments?
(Encoded message size should be about 30% larger than the original, so
if we want to allow attachments of ma
On 2010-09-28 8:12 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Charles Marcus wrote:
>> Are you submitting this message via a webmail client?
> Huh?
>> Maybe this is a web server/php upload size limitation?
> No. What in the log excerpt makes you suspect that?
The 127.0.0.1 IP address - but obviously I replied w
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-09-27 6:00 PM, Jim McIver wrote:
(message size 5414717 exceeds size limit 5242880 of server
127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1])
As already pointed out, this error is not from the postfix server, but
from the client...
Correct.
Are you submitting this message via a webmail
On 9/27/2010 6:53 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jim McIver put forth on 9/27/2010 5:00 PM:
I'm running postfix 2.5.6 on Freebsd 7.2 and am having an issue with
message size limit and a user not being able to send a file.
I'm trying to limit the message size to 6 megabytes and in the mai
On 2010-09-27 6:00 PM, Jim McIver wrote:
> (message size 5414717 exceeds size limit 5242880 of server
> 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1])
As already pointed out, this error is not from the postfix server, but
from the client...
Are you submitting this message via a webmail client?
Maybe this is
* Jim McIver :
> I'm trying to limit the message size to 6 megabytes and in the
> main.cf I set:
>
> message_size_limit = 600
That's not 6 megabytes
> (message size 5414717 exceeds size limit 5242880 of server
> 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1])
5242880 != 600
>
Jim McIver put forth on 9/27/2010 5:00 PM:
> I'm running postfix 2.5.6 on Freebsd 7.2 and am having an issue with
> message size limit and a user not being able to send a file.
>
> I'm trying to limit the message size to 6 megabytes and in the main.cf I
> set:
>
&g
Jim McIver wrote:
On 9/27/2010 3:55 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 28/09/10 8:00 AM, Jim McIver wrote:
I'm running postfix 2.5.6 on Freebsd 7.2 and am having an issue with
message size limit and a user not being able to send a file.
I'm trying to limit the message size to 6 megabytes
On 9/27/2010 3:55 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 28/09/10 8:00 AM, Jim McIver wrote:
I'm running postfix 2.5.6 on Freebsd 7.2 and am having an issue with
message size limit and a user not being able to send a file.
I'm trying to limit the message size to 6 megabytes and in the mai
On 28/09/10 8:00 AM, Jim McIver wrote:
> I'm running postfix 2.5.6 on Freebsd 7.2 and am having an issue with
> message size limit and a user not being able to send a file.
>
> I'm trying to limit the message size to 6 megabytes and in the main.cf I
> set:
>
> me
I'm running postfix 2.5.6 on Freebsd 7.2 and am having an issue with
message size limit and a user not being able to send a file.
I'm trying to limit the message size to 6 megabytes and in the main.cf I
set:
message_size_limit = 600
maillog shows:
(message size 5414717 ex
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Squeeshh Me:
>> Wietse: ok, here it is:
>> egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /var/log/maillog | more
>>
>> Aug 22 21:50:17 node2 postfix/virtual[71240]: panic: file size limit
>> 100 <
Squeeshh Me:
> Wietse: ok, here it is:
> egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /var/log/maillog | more
>
> Aug 22 21:50:17 node2 postfix/virtual[71240]: panic: file size limit
> 100 < message size 1498997.
Your Postfix version was modified with an unofficial pa
warning|error|fatal|panic):' /var/log/maillog | more
Aug 22 21:50:17 node2 postfix/virtual[71240]: panic: file size limit
100 < message size 1498997. This causes large messages to be
delivered repeatedly after they were submitted with "sendmail -t" or
after recipients were added with
Squeeshh Me:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for replying. My bad, I realised I posted the log message from
> /var/log/message. It's quite similar to what I get in postfix log
> too. Here's the postfix /var/log/mailog version of a test mail that I just
> sent, hope this is better (also there are no other warnin
own[172.31.0.181]
Aug 22 21:50:17 node1 postfix/qmgr[59650]: 4F4056EB019: from=,
size=1498409, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Aug 22 21:50:17 node1 postfix/virtual[71240]: panic: file size limit 100
< message size 1498997. This causes large messages to be delivered
repeatedly after they were submitte
Squeeshh Me:
> Aug 21 11:12:55 node1 kernel: pid 40382 (virtual), uid 5000: exited on
> signal 6
For details, look in your MAILLOG file.
Wietse
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Look for obvious signs of trouble
Postfix logs all failed and successful deliveries to a logf
(5Mb), postfix panics and the mail would be stuck in the mail queue.
Case (B) : Incoming mail size = 6.8 Mb (6887595) .
/var/log/maillog:
Aug 21 11:12:54 node1 postfix/virtual[40382]: panic: file size limit 500
< message size 6887595. This causes large messages to be delivered
repeatedly af
Robert Bude:
> Hi !
>
> Is there a possibility to configure postfix to send an email
> notification to the sender and receiver of an email, which is not
> accepted because of exceeding the message size limit ?
> We have a client, who wants to get notified if someone send him
Hi !
Is there a possibility to configure postfix to send an email
notification to the sender and receiver of an email, which is not
accepted because of exceeding the message size limit ?
We have a client, who wants to get notified if someone send him an
email, which was rejected because of
David Southwell:
> How do I set an unlimited outgoing email attachment size?
If would do that, then you would also need an unlimited disk
for the mail queue.
For safety reasons Postfix will not accept mail when the amount of
free space in the queue is less than 1.5x message size li
Charles Marcus put forth on 10/2/2009 10:19 AM:
> On 10/2/2009 11:11 AM, David Southwell wrote:
>> How do I set an unlimited outgoing email attachment size?
>> thanks in advance
>> david
>
> message_size_limit =
>
> ### is in bytes
>
> This affects all messages though - if you need
On 2009-10-02 David Southwell wrote:
> How do I set an unlimited outgoing email attachment size?
Enable submission in your master.cf (with "-o message_size_limit=0" as
an additional option), and have your internal users send mail via
submission (port 587/tcp) instead of plain SMTP.
Regards
Ansgar
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
