Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
>>> This is harder than it looks. do you really need to worry about all this
>>> stuff or are you inventing problems?
>
> Well, I don't think I'm inventing problems, maybe I could do it in a
> easier way, and that's why I sent this mail to this list. ;)
>
> I had a lot o
Robert Schetterer a écrit :
> Am 23.03.2010 00:14, schrieb mouss:
>> Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
>>> Hi Reinaldo,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Robert Schetterer
wrote:
> Am 23.03.2010 00:14, schrieb mouss:
>>> Also I droped the use of the VDA patches, since it implements
>>> everything in Postfix's LDA and I am actually using the Dovecot's
>>> (deliver).
>>
>> well, if you use dovecot, then forget about v
Am 23.03.2010 00:14, schrieb mouss:
> Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
>> Hi Reinaldo,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could
see, none
Am 22.03.2010 22:36, schrieb Mauro Faccenda:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Robert Schetterer
> wrote:
> [snip]
1. http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net/
>>>
>>> I took a look at it and, unless I missunderstood, I'll need to add a
>>> line for each mailbox in the databas
Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
> Hi Reinaldo,
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>>> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could
>>> see, none of the alternatives (that I've found) could
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Robert Schetterer
wrote:
[snip]
>>> 1. http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net/
>>
>> I took a look at it and, unless I missunderstood, I'll need to add a
>> line for each mailbox in the database and that's inviable for my
>> setup.
>>
[snip]
>
> Hi i d
Am 22.03.2010 21:53, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 22.03.2010 20:05, schrieb Mauro Faccenda:
>> Hi Reinaldo,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
Alternative to that patch? I did some searches
Am 22.03.2010 20:05, schrieb Mauro Faccenda:
> Hi Reinaldo,
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>>>
>>> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could
>>> see, none of the alternatives
Hi Reinaldo,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>>
>> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could
>> see, none of the alternatives (that I've found) could reject the
>> message in SMTP. I
Hi mouss,
Thank you and Reinaldo very much for your help.
I'll take a look at it. ;)
Mauro
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:14 AM, mouss wrote:
> Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
>>[snip]
>>
>> But I don't know yet how to do it with procmail (or similar), and
>> that's what I'm asking.
>>
>
> for procmail,
Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
>[snip]
>> you mean SMTP, not LMTP...
>
> Well, SMTP or LMTP, it's a instance to only receive local mails. But,
> I don't think it makes any difference here, right? ;)
>
postfix doesn't have an "LMTP server" (an lmtpd).
>[snip]
>
> But I don't know yet how to do it wit
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>
> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could
> see, none of the alternatives (that I've found) could reject the
> message in SMTP. I think it's nice to not generate bouncing
> messages/backscatter. But if someone ha
Hi Mouss,
Thanks for you answer.
Bellow some observations/questions.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:08 PM, mouss wrote:
[...]
>> This setup doesn't work well for me because it doesn't update the
>> maildirsize (I'm using the VDA patches in Postfix) file in the user's
>> Maildir and it doesn't automa
Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
> Hi again,
>
> I'm using a setup integrated with Active Directory with Maildir and I
> need to do some filtering in messages (basically manipulating some
> headers).
>
> Using procmail as a transport like:
> ---
> procmail unix - n n - - p
Hi again,
I'm using a setup integrated with Active Directory with Maildir and I
need to do some filtering in messages (basically manipulating some
headers).
Using procmail as a transport like:
---
procmail unix - n n - - pipe
flags=Ru user=vmail argv=/usr/bin/pro
16 matches
Mail list logo
