On 07/08/2010 06:10 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40, markus reichelt wrote:
ALso, I can only stress what has been said already: get your distro
shit together; go along with your hunch about slackware, ask
slackware specific questions on a slackware mailinglist/usenet gr
Phil Howard wrote:
> I wanted to get input on it. I'm still on the fence about making that
> change at work. The kind of input I was hoping was something that
> indicated general ease of setup from an administrative perspective.
> If the feedback with Ubuntu is that it works fine, then I'd consid
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 15:04, markus reichelt wrote:
> * Phil Howard wrote:
>
> A single user scares you? Good heavens.
>
>> So what was my question specific to, if not Postfix? It certainly
>> was not specific to any distro. Postfix was the common element.
>
> You are looking for the silver bu
* Phil Howard wrote:
A single user scares you? Good heavens.
> So what was my question specific to, if not Postfix? It certainly
> was not specific to any distro. Postfix was the common element.
You are looking for the silver bullet in times when there's only a
golden child. (pardon my pun)
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:15, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
> (I've installed PF on half a dozen Ubuntu boxes, with no hiccups
> significant enough to remember.)
>
> What I would say is that the differences between distros only involve
> setup and maybe maintenance, and do not involve performance, so
Phil Howard wrote (on Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:10:39PM -0400):
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40, markus reichelt wrote:
>
> > ALso, I can only stress what has been said already: get your distro
> > shit together; go along with your hunch about slackware, ask
> > slackware specific questions on a sla
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40, markus reichelt wrote:
> ALso, I can only stress what has been said already: get your distro
> shit together; go along with your hunch about slackware, ask
> slackware specific questions on a slackware mailinglist/usenet group,
> and post postfix problems (which you
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 08:30, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> Okay, I may have been baiting a bit there.
> The obvious inference is that you need to know your distro in order to be
> able to do anything useful with it.
> If that causes issues, that distribution's support is your first port of
> call, NOT
* Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> >Why did you bother responding if you have such a narrow view that you
> >cannot see it? Do you actually like to show off how arrogant you can
> >be?
> There was, simply, no postfix-specific question in your post
Agreed.
> I could replace every mention of the word "p
On 07/07/2010 08:02 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure
postfix properly.
Name it.
Okay, I may have been baiting a bit there.
The obvious inference is that you need t
Phil Howard wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:11, Joe wrote:
>
>
>> I currently run a number of production mail servers on ubuntu LTS and
>> have never seen any of the problems you're struggling with.
>>
>
> Are you using the packaged version of Postfix, or the source you
> compile yourse
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 15:22:22 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 15:13:00 Phil Howard wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:00, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 14:42:29 Phil Howard wrote:
> > >> Ubuntu works reasonably OK with everything else I've
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 15:14:08 Gary Chambers wrote:
> > No. Clearly not the case. Ubuntu is an example which interferes with
> > Postfix. I'm trying to determine if others are more or less so. I
> > suspect at least some surely must be less so.
>
> Why not simply avoid whatever hassles y
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 15:13:00 Phil Howard wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:00, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 14:42:29 Phil Howard wrote:
> >> Ubuntu works reasonably OK with everything else I've used on it.
> >> Problem exist with Postfix on it. They've said to a
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:14, Gary Chambers wrote:
>> No. Clearly not the case. Ubuntu is an example which interferes with
>> Postfix. I'm trying to determine if others are more or less so. I
>> suspect at least some surely must be less so.
>
> Why not simply avoid whatever hassles you're enco
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:11, Joe wrote:
> I currently run a number of production mail servers on ubuntu LTS and
> have never seen any of the problems you're struggling with.
Are you using the packaged version of Postfix, or the source you
compile yourself?
--
sHiFt HaPpEnS!
> No. Clearly not the case. Ubuntu is an example which interferes with
> Postfix. I'm trying to determine if others are more or less so. I
> suspect at least some surely must be less so.
Why not simply avoid whatever hassles you're encountering with your
distribution's version of the software
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:00, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 14:42:29 Phil Howard wrote:
>
>> Ubuntu works reasonably OK with everything else I've used on it.
>> Problem exist with Postfix on it. They've said to address it with
>> Postfix. I personally think the specific pr
Phil Howard wrote:
>
> No. Clearly not the case. Ubuntu is an example which interferes with
> Postfix. I'm trying to determine if others are more or less so. I
> suspect at least some surely must be less so.
>
No FUD please. I've deployed smtp servers running hpux, solaris,
slackware, redha
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 14:42:29 Phil Howard wrote:
> Ubuntu works reasonably OK with everything else I've used on it.
> Problem exist with Postfix on it. They've said to address it with
> Postfix. I personally think the specific problems are more of how
> Ubuntu handles Postfix poorly. On
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 14:30, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-07-07 2:02 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>>> I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure
>>> postfix properly.
>
>> Name it.
>
> All of them?
No. Clearly not
On 2010-07-07 2:02 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure
>> postfix properly.
> Name it.
All of them?
>> Anything that interferes with that is not worth the effort.
> Which do you
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure
> postfix properly.
Name it.
> Anything that interferes with that is not worth the effort.
Which do you use?
> Regardless, no specific distribution will be supported
On 07/07/2010 05:25 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
I am finally putting together a test mail server (something I wish I
had when putting together the first mail server, but lack of hardware
due to lack of funding flow limited that). But now I have another
machine.
But I am still seeing all the issues I
I am finally putting together a test mail server (something I wish I
had when putting together the first mail server, but lack of hardware
due to lack of funding flow limited that). But now I have another
machine.
But I am still seeing all the issues I had before with Ubuntu. At
first I tried to
25 matches
Mail list logo
