On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:15, N. Yaakov Ziskind <aw...@ziskind.us> wrote:
> (I've installed PF on half a dozen Ubuntu boxes, with no hiccups > significant enough to remember.) > > What I would say is that the differences between distros only involve > setup and maybe maintenance, and do not involve performance, so that > utlimately, what extra effort there is is only pocket change to > sysadmins. I guess you mean performance in terms of speed. I'm looking for the bigger picture, to include reliability, effective interoperability, administrator maintenance time, etc. > Now, if someone would come forward with a claim that, "PF runs 10% > slower/faster etc. on RH vs. Suse", I'm sure the list maintainers would > be ALL over it. In what way? If everything was slower on distro XYZ, I'd say that's an XYZ issue. If distros tend to be uniform but Postfix varies, then I'd wonder about Postfix. But I'm really right in the middle trying to figure it out. -- sHiFt HaPpEnS!
