Phil Howard wrote (on Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:10:39PM -0400): > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40, markus reichelt <m...@mareichelt.com> wrote: > > > ALso, I can only stress what has been said already: get your distro > > shit together; go along with your hunch about slackware, ask > > slackware specific questions on a slackware mailinglist/usenet group, > > and post postfix problems (which you researched yourself but couldnt > > solve on your own) in here. > > If one asks "How well does Postfix perform on Slackware" ... on a > Slackware list/forum ... better hope Jeroen isn't on that list/forum. > > -- > sHiFt HaPpEnS!
(I've installed PF on half a dozen Ubuntu boxes, with no hiccups significant enough to remember.) What I would say is that the differences between distros only involve setup and maybe maintenance, and do not involve performance, so that utlimately, what extra effort there is is only pocket change to sysadmins. Now, if someone would come forward with a claim that, "PF runs 10% slower/faster etc. on RH vs. Suse", I'm sure the list maintainers would be ALL over it. -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM aw...@ziskind.us Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants
