mouss escribió:
> Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
>> What about creating a REJECT recipient rule for "abuse@", etc, with a
>> message like: "Mailbox disabled due to spam. Please, contact us by:
>> http://xxx/contact.php";.
>
> This defeats the purpose of [EMAIL PROTECTED] if I get attacks fro
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 8/26/2008, Robert Schetterer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
as far i know
blacklist reputation
is only related to
answering hostmaster@
postmaster@
abuse@
webmaster@
by rfc
My understanding is the RFC only requires postmaster and abuse to be
valid, NOT webmaster - and I'v
Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
What about creating a REJECT recipient rule for "abuse@", etc, with a
message like: "Mailbox disabled due to spam. Please, contact us by:
http://xxx/contact.php";.
This defeats the purpose of [EMAIL PROTECTED] if I get attacks from your
networks, and if you
Robert Schetterer wrote, at 08/26/2008 09:04 AM:
you may be right but having
webmaster an hostmaster does not harm,
webmaster is an arbitrary support address you can use however you like,
for any of your sites. But there is a convention that hostmaster is for
DNS issues, so you might want to
Charles Marcus wrote, at 08/26/2008 08:57 AM:
On 8/26/2008, Robert Schetterer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
as far i know
blacklist reputation
is only related to
answering hostmaster@
postmaster@
abuse@
webmaster@
by rfc
My understanding is the RFC only requires postmaster and abuse to be
valid,
What about creating a REJECT recipient rule for "abuse@", etc, with a
message like: "Mailbox disabled due to spam. Please, contact us by:
http://xxx/contact.php";. And then having some kind of ticket system in
contact.php requiring at least a Turing test -aka Captcha- to accept the
new request? In
Charles Marcus schrieb:
On 8/26/2008, Robert Schetterer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
as far i know
blacklist reputation
is only related to
answering hostmaster@
postmaster@
abuse@
webmaster@
by rfc
My understanding is the RFC only requires postmaster and abuse to be
valid, NOT webmaster - and I
On 8/26/2008, Robert Schetterer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> as far i know
> blacklist reputation
> is only related to
> answering hostmaster@
> postmaster@
> abuse@
> webmaster@
> by rfc
My understanding is the RFC only requires postmaster and abuse to be
valid, NOT webmaster - and I've NEVER us
Jeff wrote, at 08/25/2008 08:50 PM:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Tony Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nobody will
read those emails.
That is a very very bad idea and
Stefan Palme schrieb:
Hi Robert,
there is nothing you can do against people
writing/reply mails to adresses what ever, so i think
this problem is not really total solvable by
tec stuff , also there is less what you can do about
what people think about your reputation, so you better dont care
Hi Robert,
> there is nothing you can do against people
> writing/reply mails to adresses what ever, so i think
> this problem is not really total solvable by
> tec stuff , also there is less what you can do about
> what people think about your reputation, so you better dont care
It's not MY repu
Stefan Palme schrieb:
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 10:51 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Jeff schrieb:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Tony Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nob
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 10:51 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Jeff schrieb:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Tony Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nobody will
Jeff schrieb:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Tony Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nobody will
read those emails.
That is a very very bad idea and the best way to have y
Jeff wrote:
I'm afraid I don't see how sending mail with an unmonitored return
address (i.e., accepted and delivered locally to /dev/null) will get
you on an RBL. I get mail of that type from big companies all the
time. They usually have something in the message that explains that
you should not
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Tony Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nobody will
>> read those emails.
>
> That is a very very bad idea and the best way to have your s
> Instead of adding an ever-increasing list of features to Postfix
> (or throwing in a Turing-complete scripting language) I decided
> around 2000 to allow people to plug stuff into Postfix: content
> filters, policy daemons, and Milter applications.
This is absolutely ok - I've just asked to be
Stefan Palme:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> Thanks for all your answers. My first approach to just throw
> away all bounces caused by senseless data entered into a web
> form is obviously too naive ;-)
>
> I guess I will go the way to collect bounces by a script and
> establish an
Thanks for all your answers. My first approach to just throw
away all bounces caused by senseless data entered into a web
form is obviously too naive ;-)
I guess I will go the way to collect bounces by a script and
establish an smtpd_recipient_restrictions based on this list
of bouncing addresses.
Stefan Palme wrote:
I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nobody will
read those emails.
That is a very very bad idea and the best way to have your server added to
many RBLs.
You want to look at and process all
Stefan Palme wrote:
Hmmm. Maybe I did not understand you, or you me... ;-)
I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nobody will
read those emails.
The Reply-To-address will become a really existing address which i
> On this special server the one and only client is the web application,
> where anonymous users can use a web form to ask for an account. They
> have to fill in their email address. The web application sends a
> mail to this address with a dynamically generated link the user has
> to follow to rea
> > I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nobody will
> > read those emails.
>
> That is a very very bad idea and the best way to have your server added to
> many RBLs.
>
> You want to look at and process al
> I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nobody will
> read those emails.
That is a very very bad idea and the best way to have your server added to
many RBLs.
You want to look at and process all bounce messages
Hi,
> > It happens very very often that users enter an invalid email
> > address or just senseless texts. So the webmaster-address
> > receives all the backscatter from undeliverable mail.
>
> This is not backscatter. this is a legitimate bounce.
Ok, sorry, I've used the wrong term - I'm talking
Stefan Palme wrote:
Hello,
a little bit off topic - but maybe someone can comment this...
We are running a website where users can register themself, use
features like "send this page to a friend" etc. Those features
make the web application send an email to a user. The from
addresses (envelope
Hello,
a little bit off topic - but maybe someone can comment this...
We are running a website where users can register themself, use
features like "send this page to a friend" etc. Those features
make the web application send an email to a user. The from
addresses (envelope FROM and header From:
27 matches
Mail list logo
