On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:15:01PM -0700, Richard Troy wrote:
> "Public Internet MX hosts without certificates signed by a "reputable" CA
> must generate, and be prepared to present to most clients, a self-signed
> or private-CA signed certificate. The remote SMTP client will generally
> not be ab
On 3/12/2012 3:15 PM, Richard Troy wrote:
>
>
> Noel,
>
> this is not a big deal to me, but here's where I became concerned about
> self-signed certs:
>
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Noel Jones wrote:
>>
>> On 3/12/2012 12:14 PM, Richard Troy wrote:
>>> The documentation found here:
>>>
>>> http://www
Noel,
this is not a big deal to me, but here's where I became concerned about
self-signed certs:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> On 3/12/2012 12:14 PM, Richard Troy wrote:
> > The documentation found here:
> >
> > http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html
> >
> > claims (intimates) that
On 3/12/2012 1:46 PM, Richard Troy wrote:
>> I'd be keen to know how I can, if I should, offload port 25; as I
>> > indicated I'm using port 25 because I didn't stumble over any other course
>> > of action. Please feel free to point me at what I _should_ be doing!
>> > -smile-
>
>...I'd still
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Troy wrote:
...None of the reject_* things seemed to apply, but then, well, CLEARLY
at least one of them did... Sure would be nice if the log contained the
reason for rejection, however, I'm not complaining; this community has
provided me with GREAT software for a LO
On 3/12/2012 12:14 PM, Richard Troy wrote:
> The documentation found here:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html
>
> claims (intimates) that it's not possible to run a site on a self-signed
> certificate, however, there's ZERO budget for a signed certificate, so
> unless I can get one for te
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> You're supposed to share the result, not say "looks correct". As
> the reporter of a problem, you are in the worst position to say
> that things are correct, because if you were able to see your
> mistake, then you would not be posting on this mailin
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Larry Stone wrote:
>
> > It's not clear if you're trying to do this on port 25 or port 587
> > (submission).
>
> I'd be keen to know how I can, if I should, offload port 25; as I
> indicated I'm using port 25 because I didn't stumble over any other course
> of action. Pleas
Richard Troy:
>
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Output from the "postconf -n" command is preferred here. If this
> > output differs from what you expect, then that it a possible
> > contributor to the problem.
>
> Yes, already checked: high fidelity, no discrepancies.
You're s
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Larry Stone wrote:
>
> I haven't seen any followups with the request postconf -n output but:
>
Um, nobody asked for it; Wietse only said it was preferred over sharing
the values individually. -smile- However, I'll take your statement as an
implicit request - it's below.
> It
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Output from the "postconf -n" command is preferred here. If this
> output differs from what you expect, then that it a possible
> contributor to the problem.
Yes, already checked: high fidelity, no discrepancies.
> TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.p
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Troy wrote:
My problem statement is simply, "it should be working", but doesn't, and I
don't get any announcement of "auth" when testing connections to Postfix
as per directions here:
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#server_test
I haven't seen any followu
Am 12.03.2012 18:44, schrieb Richard Troy:
>> with dovecot 2.x the follwoing in "dovecot.conf" is
>
> Using 1.2.8
this is really old
>> the mode/owner/group
> No, not missed, however:
>
>> unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth {
>
> My code reads:
> path = /var/spool/postfix/privat
Herr Harald,
> please describe you problem a little shorter
Ja, klein.
> with dovecot 2.x the follwoing in "dovecot.conf" is
Using 1.2.8.
> the mode/owner/group
No, not missed, however:
> unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth {
My code reads:
path = /var/spool/postfix/private/au
Richard Troy:
> My problem statement is simply, "it should be working", but doesn't, and I
> don't get any announcement of "auth" when testing connections to Postfix
> as per directions here:
...
> smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
> smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth
> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
> broken_sa
Am 12.03.2012 18:14, schrieb Richard Troy:
please describe you problem a little shorter
with dovecot 2.x the follwoing in "dovecot.conf" is
working like a charme, if i should guess you missed
the mode/owner/group
# configure backend for postfix sasl-auth
service auth {
unix_listener /var/s
Hello Folks,
I've been the admin of a site that uses Postfix with Dovecot on RedHat
since, oh, gosh, maybe 1996? It's been a long time. I've never built it
from source, though, just used the rpms (and I wonder if maybe that's my
problem now). It just works, is reliable, and lets me be a very-part
17 matches
Mail list logo
