y lookup the domains and dig -x the IPs,
>> so I don’t think bind is the issue?
>
> Red herrings.
>
>
>> Aug 29 01:30:13 mail.covisp.net postfix/smtpd[40178] 4Bdp5d3gF5z36j0y:
>> reject: RCPT from mx2.freebsd.org[96.47.72.81]: 451 4.3.0
>> : Temporary lookup
@lbutlr wrote:
> Bind is running, and I can manually lookup the domains and dig -x
> the IPs, so I don’t think bind is the issue?
Although dig and drill are good for tracing DNS queries the better
tool for tracing system default lookups is 'getent'. It will perform
a lookup using the same libc li
issue?
Red herrings.
> Aug 29 01:30:13 mail.covisp.net postfix/smtpd[40178] 4Bdp5d3gF5z36j0y:
> reject: RCPT from mx2.freebsd.org[96.47.72.81]: 451 4.3.0
> : Temporary lookup failure;
> from= to=
> proto=ESMTP helo=
Who said the lookup failure is a DNS problem? More likely
@lbutlr:
> Aug 29 01:30:13 mail.covisp.net postfix/smtpd[40178] 4Bdp5d3gF5z36j0y:
> reject: RCPT from mx2.freebsd.org[96.47.72.81]: 451 4.3.0
> : Temporary lookup failure;
> from= to=
> proto=ESMTP helo=
Your Postfix resolv.conf file may point to the wrong IP address.
Wietse
@lbutlr skrev den 2020-08-29 14:16:
After updating Bind and dovecot and rebooting the server, I am getting
these errors on almost every incoming mail.
try reboot ?
Current load os 0.29 instead of 12.9 and climbing, sp I don’t think
it’s related.
is
dig +trace google.com
working ?
is
pin
] 4Bdp5d3gF5z36j0y: reject:
RCPT from mx2.freebsd.org[96.47.72.81]: 451 4.3.0 :
Temporary lookup failure; from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=
# portmaster -l | egrep '(postfix|dovec|bind)'
===>>> bind-tools-9.16.6
===>>> dovecot-2.3.11.3
===>>> bind916-9.16.6_1
===>>
r (451): failed when adding the recipient "ad...@mail.zimbra.com"
> (4.3.0 : Temporary lookup failure)
>
>
> What should I do to correct this?
Look In The LOG.
Wietse
-setup-centos-7
I can connect with users in new domains and send mail locally.
When I try to send mail (with roundcube) to the outside, the following error
message appears in the webmail:
SMTP Error (451): failed when adding the recipient "ad...@mail.zimbra.com"
(4.3.0 : Temporary look
Thanks, it was solved as my previous answer.
2013/11/11 Wietse Venema
> Merve Temizer:
> > If i do not need why i am getting "Temporary lookup failure" for every
> > attempt while i was sending mail through telnet?
>
> Wietse
> > The reason for the failure
Merve Temizer:
> If i do not need why i am getting "Temporary lookup failure" for every
> attempt while i was sending mail through telnet?
Wietse
> The reason for the failure is in the MAILLOG file. Postfix does
> not provide configuration error details to SMTP client
Merve Temizer:
> If i do not need why i am getting "Temporary lookup failure" for every
> attempt while i was sending mail through telnet?
The reason for the failure is in the MAILLOG file.
Postfix does not provide configuration error details to SMTP clients.
Wietse
jectclasses and attributetypes like
mailacceptinggeneralid to my configuration?
If i do not need why i am getting "Temporary lookup failure" for every
attempt while i was sending mail through telnet?
My conf is below
/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf
server_host = 192.168.1.255
server_p
Zitat von Viktor Dukhovni :
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:13:05PM +, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
>Postfix reports that the LDAP client library could not connect to
>any of the LDAP servers. Don't shoot the messenger.
>
>Wietse
Would the "domain" parameter in th
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:13:05PM +, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> Zitat von Wietse Venema :
>
> >Postfix reports that the LDAP client library could not connect to
> >any of the LDAP servers. Don't shoot the messenger.
> >
> > Wietse
>
> Would the "domain" parameter in the LDAP config pr
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Alvaro Marin:
For a moment, one ActiveDirectory server for some domains was down, so
I've seen in logs:
warning: dict_ldap_connect: Unable to bind to server ldap://IP1
ldap://IP2 as cn=x,ou=x,dc=x,dc=x: -1 (Can't contact LDAP server)
...
Is anyway to configure Post
Alvaro Marin:
> For a moment, one ActiveDirectory server for some domains was down, so
> I've seen in logs:
>
> warning: dict_ldap_connect: Unable to bind to server ldap://IP1
> ldap://IP2 as cn=x,ou=x,dc=x,dc=x: -1 (Can't contact LDAP server)
...
> Is anyway to configure Postfix to avoid this s
://IP1 ldap://IP2 as
> cn=x,ou=x,dc=x,dc=x: -1 (Can't
> contact LDAP server)
>
> The other LDAP and AD server configured in Postfix, were responding ok but a
> lot of emails were being rejected with
> the "Temporary lookup failure" error (and not only emails for do
server configured in Postfix, were responding ok
but a lot of emails were being rejected with the "Temporary lookup
failure" error (and not only emails for domains in that down AD server,
emails for domains of working LDAP/AD too).
Mar 6 16:19:13 relay1 postfix/smtpd[21555]: warning: dict
Victor Duchovni:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:54:47PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > I am a bit reluctant at this time to assume that untyped data coming in
> > > that looks like UTF-8, really is UTF-8. Even if the LDAP lookup returns
> > > plausibly useful results, will the UTF-8 envelope su
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:54:47PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I am a bit reluctant at this time to assume that untyped data coming in
> > that looks like UTF-8, really is UTF-8. Even if the LDAP lookup returns
> > plausibly useful results, will the UTF-8 envelope survive related
> > processin
Victor Duchovni:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:53:03PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Currently, sites that send valid UTF-8 in MAIL/RCPT commands can
> > make meaningful LDAP queries in Postfix. Lots of MTAs are 8-bit
> > clean internally, so this can actually work today.
> >
> > Do we want t
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:53:03PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Currently, sites that send valid UTF-8 in MAIL/RCPT commands can
> make meaningful LDAP queries in Postfix. Lots of MTAs are 8-bit
> clean internally, so this can actually work today.
>
> Do we want to remove this ability from Post
Stefan Foerster:
> As of today, is u...@sch?n.example.com the same user as
> u...@xn--schn-7qa.example.com, as far as e.g. access(5) maps are
> concerned?
No, they are, and have always been, different.
If xn--schn-7qa.example.com is what Postfix receives, then
xn--schn-7qa.example.com is what Pos
* Wietse Venema :
> Currently, sites that send valid UTF-8 in MAIL/RCPT commands can
> make meaningful LDAP queries in Postfix. Lots of MTAs are 8-bit
> clean internally, so this can actually work today.
>
> Do we want to remove this ability from Postfix, or should we add
> a valid_utf_8() routin
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:54:00PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > Don't pass non-ASCII user names to your LDAP table.
> >
> > Hmm. If the Postfix LDAP driver handles only non-ASCII query keys
> > then we should have a smarter response from the mail system.
>
> Agreed. By
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:54:00PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Don't pass non-ASCII user names to your LDAP table.
>
> Hmm. If the Postfix LDAP driver handles only non-ASCII query keys
> then we should have a smarter response from the mail system.
Agreed. By the time I read your message, I h
efore passing them to LDAP.
>
> > In: RCPT TO:<"?myuser"@example.com>
> > Out: 451 4.3.0 < myu...@example.com>: Temporary lookup failure
>
> Don't pass non-ASCII user names to your LDAP table.
Hmm. If the Postfix LDAP driver handles only non-ASCII quer
ot;@example.com>
> Out: 451 4.3.0 < myu...@example.com>: Temporary lookup failure
Don't pass non-ASCII user names to your LDAP table.
> search_base = uid=%u,ou=users,dc=example,dc=com
In RFC 2253, all attribute values are assumed to be UTF-8. Postfix has
no idea what character-e
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:31:50AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Friday, March 26, 2010 6:28 PM +0100 Matias Surdi
> wrote:
>
>
>> Additionaly, on the postfix log I can see:
>>
>> Mar 26 15:44:17 calipso postfix/smtpd[27237]: warning:
>> dict_ldap_lookup: Search error 34: Invalid DN s
--On Friday, March 26, 2010 6:28 PM +0100 Matias Surdi
wrote:
Additionaly, on the postfix log I can see:
Mar 26 15:44:17 calipso postfix/smtpd[27237]: warning:
dict_ldap_lookup: Search error 34: Invalid DN syntax
Looks like dict_ldap_lookup is failing to properly encode the data before
qu
MAIL FROM:
Out: 250 2.1.0 Ok
In: RCPT TO:<"?myuser"@example.com>
Out: 451 4.3.0 < myu...@example.com>: Temporary lookup failure
In: QUIT
Out: 221 2.0.0 Bye
Additionaly, on the postfix log I can see:
Mar 26 15:44:17 calipso postfix/smtpd[27237]: warning:
dict_ldap_lookup: Se
wner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
Sent: 29 May 2009 17:17
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: temporary lookup failure
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 02:09:35AM +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
> 2009/5/29 Jon Harris :
> > However, I have tried putting "proxy:"
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 02:09:35AM +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
> 2009/5/29 Jon Harris :
> > However, I have tried putting "proxy:" in front of my mysql maps and it
> > stopped it being able to receive email. Presumably, I need to enable
> > proxymap to get proxy maps to work. This is something I
2009/5/29 Jon Harris :
> However, I have tried putting "proxy:" in front of my mysql maps and it
> stopped it being able to receive email. Presumably, I need to enable
> proxymap to get proxy maps to work. This is something I don't know how
> to do.
Error logs?
My suspicion is that the proxy map
Jon Harris wrote:
> Hi Brian
>
> Everything you said makes a great deal of sense - thanks very much. I
> have changed the RBL settings, as you advised.
>
> Yes, the load has gone up considerably, particularly, we are seeing a
> massive rise of spam traffic on this box (mainly on one or two of the
>
Hi Brian
Everything you said makes a great deal of sense - thanks very much. I
have changed the RBL settings, as you advised.
Yes, the load has gone up considerably, particularly, we are seeing a
massive rise of spam traffic on this box (mainly on one or two of the
domains 30 domains its responsi
Jon Harris wrote:
> Hi List
>
> A few of our clients use our postfix server for relaying. Generally, its
> working really well, but several users are reporting regular "451
> Temporary Lookup Failure" bounce errors. This is them sending "outgoing"
> (ie non-l
Hi List
A few of our clients use our postfix server for relaying. Generally, its
working really well, but several users are reporting regular "451
Temporary Lookup Failure" bounce errors. This is them sending "outgoing"
(ie non-local domains) and domains that Postfix should
Hungry Snail:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I have just started recieving emails from postfix telling me that there is a
> Temporary lookup failure.
>
>
> *
> Subject: Postfix SMTP server: errors from
> adsl190-28-1-167.epm.net.co[190.28.1.167]
> Out: 220 mail
Hi guys,
I have just started recieving emails from postfix telling me that there is a
Temporary lookup failure.
*
Subject: Postfix SMTP server: errors from
adsl190-28-1-167.epm.net.co[190.28.1.167]
Out: 220 mailserver.mydomain.tld ESMTP Postfix (Debian/GNU)
In: HELO equipo34
Out: 250
Jeff wrote:
Out: 451 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Temporary lookup failure
In: RSET
Out: 250 Ok
In: QUIT
Out: 221 Bye
What is the end result of this? Does the sender see an immediate
error? Does the sending MTA queue and retry? I have googled in vain
for the answer.
Response codes st
>
> Out: 451 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Temporary lookup failure
> In: RSET
> Out: 250 Ok
> In: QUIT
> Out: 221 Bye
>
> What is the end result of this? Does the sender see an immediate
> error?
No.
> Does the sending MTA queue and retry?
Hopefully yes.
--
Ra
We recently enabled LDAP lookups (against Active Directory) for
recipient verification. It's working great but I did get one "server
error" message from the postfix daemon that had a session transcript
that ended with:
Out: 451 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Temporary lookup failure
43 matches
Mail list logo
