Guys, have your pissing context somewhere else.
On 4/3/2012 12:18 PM, Sam Jones wrote:
>
>>> I do apologise for the distress, offence and disturbance my rude stupid
>>> question has obviously caused you. I won't repeat it and I hope you can
>>> forgive me.
>>
>> Re-reading what I wrote, and reading your reply, leaves me at a bit of a
>> loss as
> > I do apologise for the distress, offence and disturbance my rude stupid
> > question has obviously caused you. I won't repeat it and I hope you can
> > forgive me.
>
> Re-reading what I wrote, and reading your reply, leaves me at a bit of a
> loss as to what prompted this immature drivel. My
On 4/3/2012 10:41 AM, Sam Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 10:31 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> It's possible, but the devil is in the details, which you did not
>> provide to us.
> It really was just a general question as to how an MTA, specifically
> Postfix, would respond if multiple alter
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 11:53 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> With Postfix, multiple IP address per A record are fine, as long
> as the CLIENT IP address is listed among them.
>
> However, having multiple PTR records for one IP address, that is a
> different matter. Postfix will not try to guess which
Sam Jones:
> Good Afternoon,
>
> My senior tech and I have been having a squabble over PTR, Hostnames and
> reverse mapping.
>
> If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name lookup
> on that, so you get back host.example.com, would it impact on mail if a
> forward query for h
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 10:36 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> >
> > If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name
> > lookup on that, so you get back host.example.com, would it impact
> > on mail if a forward query for host.example.com returned multiple
> > A records, say 1.2.3.4 & 5.6
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 10:31 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 4/3/2012 9:56 AM, Sam Jones wrote:
> > Good Afternoon,
> >
> > My senior tech and I have been having a squabble over PTR, Hostnames and
> > reverse mapping.
> >
> > If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name looku
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:56:13PM +0100, Sam Jones wrote:
> My senior tech and I have been having a squabble over PTR,
> Hostnames and reverse mapping.
>
> If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name
> lookup on that, so you get back host.example.com, would it impact
> on ma
On 4/3/2012 9:56 AM, Sam Jones wrote:
> Good Afternoon,
>
> My senior tech and I have been having a squabble over PTR, Hostnames and
> reverse mapping.
>
> If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name lookup
> on that, so you get back host.example.com, would it impact on mail
Good Afternoon,
My senior tech and I have been having a squabble over PTR, Hostnames and
reverse mapping.
If you have a client connect from 1.2.3.4 and perform a host name lookup
on that, so you get back host.example.com, would it impact on mail if a
forward query for host.example.com returned mu
11 matches
Mail list logo
