On 4/3/2012 10:41 AM, Sam Jones wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 10:31 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> It's possible, but the devil is in the details, which you did not >> provide to us. > It really was just a general question as to how an MTA, specifically > Postfix, would respond if multiple alternating A records were returned > in respect of a forward DNS request for a PTR/Hostname connection > return. > > If you don't know, that's fine - just say so. You don't need to let > yourself down with the old flame: >> This was included in your list welcome message. >> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail >> Please read it and post the relevant information it instructs you to. >> In this case, at minimum, we need to see the SMTP responses from the >> remote MTA. > Because I actually had gone through that, which is why I was able to > find the configuration value that could impact in such a scneario. > > I do apologise for the distress, offence and disturbance my rude stupid > question has obviously caused you. I won't repeat it and I hope you can > forgive me. Re-reading what I wrote, and reading your reply, leaves me at a bit of a loss as to what prompted this immature drivel. My reply was totally professional, if dry and somewhat canned. But how such would prompt a reply like this escapes me. Maybe you're just having a bad day? -- Stan
