On 4/3/2012 12:18 PM, Sam Jones wrote: > >>> I do apologise for the distress, offence and disturbance my rude stupid >>> question has obviously caused you. I won't repeat it and I hope you can >>> forgive me. >> >> Re-reading what I wrote, and reading your reply, leaves me at a bit of a >> loss as to what prompted this immature drivel. My reply was totally >> professional, if dry and somewhat canned. But how such would prompt a >> reply like this escapes me. Maybe you're just having a bad day? >> > I really don't want to start a war.
Disingenuous as you intended to, and continue it. > I'm old, tired and underpaid, but Pull sympathy strings. > you were rude, and quite unnecessarily so. You don't seem to be able to > help it, because when I was perfectly polite to you - if a touch Reverse projection, fabrication. > sarcastic in return to your 'dry and canned' response, you then went on > to describe it as 'immature drivel' - which, I'm sure you would agree, > is somewhat unprofessional and quite hypocritical. So sarcasm isn't rude, but my calling it out is rude. Calling me unprofessional after I pointed out my post was professional. Calling me a hypocrite. More reverse projection. > I'm sorry you did not know the answer, but the question has now been > addressed very professionally by polite, skilled people - to whom I am > most grateful and obliged. False assumption plus backhanded insults. > I'm sorry to have troubled you. Disingenuous. Normally I would have simply ignored your baseless rude remarks. But you made a personal attack out of your reply. Drawing you out a little more has clearly demonstrated to everyone who and what you are, so my job is done, so to speak. Feel free to have the last word, including any/all additional baseless insults you wish. P.S. be sure in the future to tell Wietse he doesn't know the answer every time he prompts a poster to follow the list instructions. :) -- Stan
