Just a note ONLY FOR:
Reindl Harald
>Sorry but what is your problem?
>you can not use your home-machine as mailserver and
>nothing will change this, so what is new in your
>message after this long thread where so many people
>made clear what happens and why?
If I know, you followed this thre
Non-authoritative answer:
108.234.71.85.in-addr.arpa name = 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz.
[85.71.234.108] blocked using zen.spamhaus.org
sorry but what is your problem?
you can not use your home-machine as mailserver and
nothing will change this, so what is new in your
message after this long
=<20110309100908.1185da2...@108.234.broadband4.iol.cz>
(FYI: This mail is send via webmail volny.cz)
--kapetr
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
Od: Jiří Pánek
Komu: Peter Evans
Předmět: Re: posfix rejected from google server
Datum: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:08:56 +0100
Hello,
this is a direct email (I have
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:01:21AM +0900, Peter Evans wrote:
> At the same time, please go here and request removal from the PBL.
>http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL043205
PBL removal will not be done for a host with generic rDNS. I am in a
PBL block too, but my host has custom reverse DNS.
Just out of curiosity, can you try to send mail directly to me?
After you have removed yourself, it should take less than about an hour to
clear from the CBL + PBL.
Then mail should go through.
Received: from 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz (108.234.broadband4.iol.cz
[85.71.234.108])
ap
Hello,
reply for:
"Peter Evans" and
Reindl Harald
My ISP (without need of request it and pay for it :-) assign every
time (via PPPOE on ADSL) the same IP address for the same client
(DSLAM port). So my IP is from "dynamic" range, but in practice is
it static IP.
I'm sure about it and it is v
Am 06.03.2011 07:51, schrieb kapetr:
> My "from:" address used by these tests of fresh Postfix installation
> I have and use many years - so it fit not in yours definition of
> "spamtrap adress".
seems you do not understand waht a spamtrap is
hint: your sender-address does not play in this game
http://cbl.abuseat.org/nat.html
http://cbl.abuseat.org/advanced.html
Some places NAT you without telling you.
This has happened on cable modems.
Are you sure your IP is the one you think it is?
I further highly doubt any link between Gmail and CBL exists.
There is no link.
Hello,
wrote:
>Subject: Re: posfix rejected from google server
>
>On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:29:08PM +0100, kapetr wrote:
>> first I have to say: the problem with home/dynamic IP ranges,
>> business accounts, ... and therefore the need of using relay of
>> my
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:29:08PM +0100, kapetr wrote:
> first I have to say: the problem with home/dynamic IP ranges,
> business accounts, ... and therefore the need of using relay of
> my ISP in my case I have well understand and I do it so.
>
> What I'm interesting for is still the:
>
> > htt
Hello.
first I have to say: the problem with home/dynamic IP ranges,
business accounts, ... and therefore the need of using relay of my
ISP in my case I have well understand and I do it so.
What I'm interesting for is still the:
> http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=85.71.234.108+&.submit=Looku
On 03/03/11 06:44, kapetr wrote:
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:11:53 + Ned Slider
wrote:
It's also listed in Spamhaus PBL:
http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL043205
I'd say it's pretty much a non-starter trying to reliably deliver
mail
>from that IP.
Sorry - I do not very well understand you
Zitat von kapetr :
And the:
http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=85.71.234.108+&.submit=Lookup
says -as you wrote:
IP Address 85.71.234.108 is listed in the CBL. It appears to be
infected with a spam sending trojan or proxy.
It was last detected at 2011-03-01 07:00 GMT (+/- 30 minutes),
approxi
On 03/03/2011 07:55 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:44 PM, kapetr wrote:
So once again, I am not spamer!
I hate spam and spamers !!
Being on a blacklist doesn't automatically make you a spammer, but it
does mean something's wrong (possibly with your Postfix config... to
kee
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:44 PM, kapetr wrote:
> So once again, I am not spamer!
> I hate spam and spamers !!
Being on a blacklist doesn't automatically make you a spammer, but it
does mean something's wrong (possibly with your Postfix config... to
keep things back on topic).
Check here to see w
Hello..
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:11:53 + Ned Slider
wrote:
>
>
>I think the original poster has bigger problems as his IP is listed
>on a
>>few DNSBLs:
>
>Enter server IP Address followed by [ENTER] to begin.
>
>RUNNING CHECKS FOR 85.71.234.108
>+
On 02/03/11 08:02, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.03.2011 08:56, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
So I can nothing to do with it (in Postfix) config - just to degrade
Postfix with "relayhost" to my ISP SMTP server - what is exactly
what I have did not want.
No need to route all mails to isp, just route n
Zitat von kapetr :
Thanks all for replays.
Just few remarks:
1. RDNS - e.g. for den...@bestcheer.com, li...@dguhl.org, ...
that's what I had try to correct with
myhostname = 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz
yes - it is what I get with dig -x , so then
dig 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz == this address
Am 02.03.2011 08:56, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
>> So I can nothing to do with it (in Postfix) config - just to degrade
>> Postfix with "relayhost" to my ISP SMTP server - what is exactly
>> what I have did not want.
>
> No need to route all mails to isp, just route needed mails. (for example
> all
2011/3/2 kapetr :
> Thanks all for replays.
>
> Just few remarks:
>
> 1. RDNS - e.g. for den...@bestcheer.com, li...@dguhl.org, ...
>
> that's what I had try to correct with
> myhostname = 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz
>
> yes - it is what I get with dig -x , so then
> dig 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz =
Thanks all for replays.
Just few remarks:
1. RDNS - e.g. for den...@bestcheer.com, li...@dguhl.org, ...
that's what I had try to correct with
myhostname = 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz
yes - it is what I get with dig -x , so then
dig 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz == this address.
So reverse DNS look
Hi Tri,
Have you also set the reverse DNS because lot of mail server check for
that. ISP could do this for you.
On 3/1/2011 5:12 PM, Tri H Trinh wrote:
On 3/1/11, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2011/3/1 Trinh Hoai Tri:
You might want to use DynDns.com's service (SendLab SMTP) at $20 for 150
relays
Emmanuel Seyman:
> * kapetr [01/03/2011 13:30] :
> >
> > In such situation the only function of Posfix left is the log.
>
> Note that you can use transport maps to use a relay only
> when sending to gmail.com .
Note that SMTP-level reject is not the only problem that you can
have when sending ma
Am 01.03.2011 16:57, schrieb Emmanuel Seyman:
> * kapetr [01/03/2011 13:30] :
>>
>> In such situation the only function of Posfix left is the log.
>
> Note that you can use transport maps to use a relay only
> when sending to gmail.com .
This does not solve the problem sending mails get russia
* kapetr [01/03/2011 13:30] :
>
> In such situation the only function of Posfix left is the log.
Note that you can use transport maps to use a relay only
when sending to gmail.com .
Emmanuel
On 3/1/11, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2011/3/1 Trinh Hoai Tri :
>> You might want to use DynDns.com's service (SendLab SMTP) at $20 for 150
>> relays per day for one year. I use this for years. Excellent service.
>
> Usually your isp provides working relayhost service for free..
>
> --
> Eero
>
Than
Thank You for explanation.
--kapetr
- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -
Od: "Reindl Harald"
Komu: "kapetr"
Předmět: Re: posfix rejected from google server
Datum: 1.3.2011 - 10:40:28
>
> Am 01.03.2011 09:28, schrieb kapetr:
> > So you mean, that this is not problem of b
Thank you,
I will have to :-(
In such situation the only function of Posfix left is the log.
--kapetr
- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -
Od: "Eero Volotinen"
Komu: "kapetr"
Předmět: Re: posfix rejected from google server
Datum: 1.3.2011 - 9:59:26
> 2011/3/1 kapetr :
> &
2011/3/1 Trinh Hoai Tri :
> You might want to use DynDns.com's service (SendLab SMTP) at $20 for 150
> relays per day for one year. I use this for years. Excellent service.
Usually your isp provides working relayhost service for free..
--
Eero
You might want to use DynDns.com's service (SendLab SMTP) at $20 for 150 relays
per day for one year. I use this for years. Excellent service.
-- Tri
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>Zitat von kapetr :
>
>> So you mean, that this is not problem of bad postfix config ?
>> So I can nothing do to get
Zitat von kapetr :
So you mean, that this is not problem of bad postfix config ?
So I can nothing do to get it working ?
Maybe must every, who wants to send mails to Google, have contract
with Google ?
It seems to be too improbable to be possible.
Is this sure or is there another possibility ?
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:40:28AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
[..]
> 108.234.71.85.in-addr.arpa is a typical homeuser-ptr
No. This is the way you ask for the PTR (eg with 'dig -x
85.71.234.108'):
% dig -x 85.71.234.108
; <<>> DiG 9.7.2-P3 <<>> -x 85.71.234.108
;; global options: +cmd
;; Go
PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -
> Od: "Eero Volotinen"
> Komu: "kapetr"
> Předmět: Re: posfix rejected from google server
> Datum: 1.3.2011 - 9:13:10
>
>> 2011/3/1 kapetr :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I need help to get sending e-mails o
> Maybe must every, who wants to send mails to Google, have contract
> with Google ?
> It seems to be too improbable to be possible.
>
> Is this sure or is there another possibility ?
>
> --kapetr
>
> - PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -
> Od: "Eero Volotinen"
>
2011/3/1 kapetr :
> So you mean, that this is not problem of bad postfix config ?
> So I can nothing do to get it working ?
>
> Maybe must every, who wants to send mails to Google, have contract
> with Google ?
> It seems to be too improbable to be possible.
>
> Is this sure or is there another pos
- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -
Od: "Eero Volotinen"
Komu: "kapetr"
Předmět: Re: posfix rejected from google server
Datum: 1.3.2011 - 9:13:10
> 2011/3/1 kapetr :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I need help to get sending e-mails out fo my
> > Ubuntu 10.10 box.
> &g
you need add a RDNS for ip address of your smtp server's.
On Tue,
1 Mar 2011 10:13:10 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2011/3/1 kapetr
:
>> Hello, I need help to get sending e-mails out fo my Ubuntu 10.10
box. My PC is connected via ADSL modem (NAT) with static public IP
adress. It is standar
On 03/01/2011 09:10 AM, kapetr wrote:
Hello,
I need help to get sending e-mails out fo my Ubuntu 10.10 box.
My PC is connected via ADSL modem (NAT) with static public IP
adress.
[...]
(Message slightly modified for easier reading:)
[85.71.234.108] The IP you're using to send mail is not au
> So I have try change my "myhostname" in main.cf (and restart
> postfix):
why? this can not chnge your home-ip
> The IP you're using to send mail is not authorized
> to 550-5.7.1 send email directly to our servers. Please use the SMTP
> relay at your 550-5.7.1 service provider instead
your ip i
2011/3/1 kapetr :
> Hello,
>
> I need help to get sending e-mails out fo my Ubuntu 10.10 box.
>
> My PC is connected via ADSL modem (NAT) with static public IP
> adress.
> It is standard "Internet client" standalone computer.
> I want to use Postix (e.g while logging of sent mails, ..) instead
> of
40 matches
Mail list logo
