On January 12, 2010 4:19:50 PM -0500 Frank Cusack
wrote:
I can't think of a scenario for ANY type of server that would *require*
multiple PTR records.
I coincidentally just came across such a case. zeroconf uses multiple
PTR records. Not in .in-addr.arpa zones, so you don't use them to
resol
On 1/12/2010 3:19 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
On January 12, 2010 2:52:58 PM -0600 Stan Hoeppner
wrote:
Frank Cusack put forth on 1/12/2010 2:29 PM:
Is it your opinion that the disadvantages I've described aren't valid?
When it comes to multiple PTRs on a single email emitting IP, yes, it is
my
On January 12, 2010 2:52:58 PM -0600 Stan Hoeppner
wrote:
Frank Cusack put forth on 1/12/2010 2:29 PM:
Is it your opinion that the disadvantages I've described aren't valid?
When it comes to multiple PTRs on a single email emitting IP, yes, it is
my opinion that that the disadvantages you des
Frank Cusack put forth on 1/12/2010 2:29 PM:
> Not to be rude, but I'm not sure why you asked me the question in the
> first place. It was in fact a great question. Your response however
> was merely to dismiss my problem. So it seems like your question was
> just rhetoric designed to sink this
On January 12, 2010 12:28:10 PM -0600 Stan Hoeppner
wrote:
Frank Cusack put forth on 1/12/2010 12:12 PM:
On January 12, 2010 12:09:28 PM -0600 Stan Hoeppner
wrote:
Frank Cusack put forth on 1/12/2010 12:04 PM:
I don't know why you would thank Wietse when there is no disadvantage
to acceptin
Frank Cusack put forth on 1/12/2010 12:12 PM:
> On January 12, 2010 12:09:28 PM -0600 Stan Hoeppner
> wrote:
>> Frank Cusack put forth on 1/12/2010 12:04 PM:
>>
>>> I don't know why you would thank Wietse when there is no disadvantage
>>> to accepting multiple PTR records. There is only a downsid
On January 12, 2010 1:10:51 PM -0500 Victor Duchovni
wrote:
If you have a specific use case in which you need guidance to configure
Postfix, please start a new thread, without the polemics.
That is why I stated originally, for my specific problem case I will be
writing in another thread. I am
On January 12, 2010 12:09:28 PM -0600 Stan Hoeppner
wrote:
Frank Cusack put forth on 1/12/2010 12:04 PM:
I don't know why you would thank Wietse when there is no disadvantage
to accepting multiple PTR records. There is only a downside.
What's the downside Frank?
Good question.
I can't ac
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:04:56PM -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On January 12, 2010 12:24:20 PM -0500 Frank Cusack
> wrote:
>> Apparently it only "honors" the first PTR record that getnameinfo()
>> returns to it. Additionally this appears to be a conscious decision
>> and in part designed to im
Frank Cusack put forth on 1/12/2010 12:04 PM:
> I don't know why you would thank Wietse when there is no disadvantage
> to accepting multiple PTR records. There is only a downside.
What's the downside Frank?
--
Stan
On January 12, 2010 12:24:20 PM -0500 Frank Cusack
wrote:
Apparently it only "honors" the first PTR record that getnameinfo()
returns to it. Additionally this appears to be a conscious decision
and in part designed to impose postfix's sense of order on the world.
Well, I see part of the probl
Quoting Frank Cusack :
Apparently it only "honors" the first PTR record that getnameinfo()
returns to it. Additionally this appears to be a conscious decision
and in part designed to impose postfix's sense of order on the world.
-frank
In this case at least, I think, "postfix's sense of o
On January 12, 2010 11:07:25 AM -0600 "/dev/rob0" wrote:
It's hard to focus on what you said when we don't know what you
said. :)
I thought it was pretty clear. :)
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:27:43AM -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
After searching the mailing list (and the web in general) what I
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:27:43AM -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
> After searching the mailing list (and the web in general) what I
> can gather about multiple PTR records is that postfix is adamant
> that hosts should not have multiple PTR records.
>
> Who cares? It's like saying DNS names should
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:27:43AM -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
> Yes we don't like it, but it's easy for postfix to accept and deal with it.
You write the code, deploy it on your systems, and suffer the consequences.
> I'll post my actual problem in another thread, to keep this one focused
> on t
15 matches
Mail list logo
