On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 11:25:41AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> On 04.04.25 15:59, Joan Moreau via Postfix-users wrote:
> > I am follwoing the doc here
> >
> > https://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/mail_systems/postfix_documentation/FILTER_README_002.html
> >
> > Ho
On 04.04.25 15:59, Joan Moreau via Postfix-users wrote:
I am follwoing the doc here
https://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/mail_systems/postfix_documentation/FILTER_README_002.html
However, on resending the mail to the postfix instance (sendmail -G -i
), how to make sure it is using the right
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 06:06:40PM +, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> «sendmail -v myself@domain» however hangs.
Of course it does, it is waiting to read the message headers and body
from standard input as expected.
> until I press Ctrl+C. This is Postfix 3.4.13. On Postfix 2.11 the
> same command
As always, very grateful for your clarifications.
El 8/6/23 a las 18:12, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió:
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
Victor Rubiella Monfort via Postfix-users:
Hi,
I want to prevent that sendmail milter rejections generates bounces
messages. Reading sendmail doc
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Victor Rubiella Monfort via Postfix-users:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to prevent that sendmail milter rejections generates bounces
> > messages. Reading sendmail documentation I see "-N" option:
> >
> > echo "HELLO" | sendmail -N 'never' t...@test.es; echo $?
> >
Victor Rubiella Monfort via Postfix-users:
> Hi,
>
> I want to prevent that sendmail milter rejections generates bounces
> messages. Reading sendmail documentation I see "-N" option:
>
> echo "HELLO" | sendmail -N 'never' t...@test.es; echo $?
>
> 0
>
> Jun 8 13:51:30 server.test postfix/clea
Víctor Rubiella Monfort via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-06-08 14:06:
echo "HELLO" | sendmail -N 'never' t...@test.es; echo $?
-N parameter only controls DSN, it does not do REJECT or BOUNCES
sendmail -f t...@test.es -bv t...@test.es -N never
more funny results
hopefully test.es is your dom
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:01:52AM +0200, witcher wrote:
> >As to popularity, I use "mutt", which already supports setting the
> >envelope sender based on the "From:" header, passing the desired
> >envelope sender to sendmail(1).
>
> Huh, I didn't know it does that.
>From my .muttrc file:
s
There isn't.
Good to know.
As to popularity, I use "mutt", which already supports setting the
envelope sender based on the "From:" header, passing the desired
envelope sender to sendmail(1).
Huh, I didn't know it does that. I've only tried sending with
sendmail(1) via the command line before
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 07:51:52PM +0200, witcher wrote:
> I'm wondering whether there is an option for sendmail to read the
> "From:" field from a mbox file to fill the envelope sender address
> (like you otherwise would with the `-f` command line flag).
There isn't.
> It doesn't seem to be doc
> On Oct 24, 2017, at 2:41 AM, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
>
> root@zwirn:~# find / -name sendmail -ls
>19874 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Sep 27 06:56
> /usr/lib/sendmail -> ../sbin/sendmail
>19767 28 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root26776 Sep 27 06:56
> /usr/sbin/s
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 07:55:47PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ulrich Zehl:
> > Oct 23 22:44:18 zwirn postfix/master[18457]: daemon started -- version
> > 3.1.6, configuration /etc/postfix
> > Oct 23 22:44:25 zwirn postfix/sendmail[18460]: fatal: unsupported
> > dictionary type: cdb
>
> Do:
>
Ulrich Zehl:
> Oct 23 22:44:18 zwirn postfix/master[18457]: daemon started -- version 3.1.6,
> configuration /etc/postfix
> Oct 23 22:44:25 zwirn postfix/sendmail[18460]: fatal: unsupported dictionary
> type: cdb
Do:
find / -name sendmail -ls
Which one of these sendmail programs were you execu
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:44:47PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ulrich Zehl:
> > When I try to use a CDB table for authorized_submit_users with Postfix
> > 3.1.6, the sendmail command exits with error "unsupported dictionary
> > type: cdb".
>
> What is the COMPLETE error message including the PRO
Ulrich Zehl:
> When I try to use a CDB table for authorized_submit_users with Postfix
> 3.1.6, the sendmail command exits with error "unsupported dictionary
> type: cdb".
What is the COMPLETE error message including the PROGRAM NAME?
Wietse
Am 23.10.2017 um 17:16 schrieb Ulrich Zehl:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 01:37:19PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>
>> On October 23, 2017 9:15:17 AM EDT, Ulrich Zehl
>> wrote:
>>> When I try to use a CDB table for authorized_submit_users with Postfix
>>> 3.1.6, the sendmail command exits with er
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 01:37:19PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> On October 23, 2017 9:15:17 AM EDT, Ulrich Zehl
> wrote:
> >When I try to use a CDB table for authorized_submit_users with Postfix
> >3.1.6, the sendmail command exits with error "unsupported dictionary
> >type: cdb".
> [...]
>
On October 23, 2017 9:15:17 AM EDT, Ulrich Zehl
wrote:
>When I try to use a CDB table for authorized_submit_users with Postfix
>3.1.6, the sendmail command exits with error "unsupported dictionary
>type: cdb".
>
>To reproduce:
>
>
># postconf mail_version
>mail_version = 3.1.6
>
># postconf
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Make the default Postfix instance a local submission-only MTA:
For a more detailed overview:
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#split
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#quick
--
Viktor.
Robert Dahlem:
>
> On 17.08.2016 20:58, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> >> I have this in main.cf:
> >> inet_interfaces = 127.0.0.1, 192.168.x.x, 80.y.y.y
> >
> > Why not: "inet_interfaces = all"?
>
> Because I intend to run a second instance on the same machine with a
> different IP address. If the p
On 17.08.2016 20:58, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> I have this in main.cf:
>> inet_interfaces = 127.0.0.1, 192.168.x.x, 80.y.y.y
>
> Why not: "inet_interfaces = all"?
Because I intend to run a second instance on the same machine with a
different IP address. If the primary instance listens on all inte
Robert Dahlem:
> Hi,
>
> I have this in main.cf:
> inet_interfaces = 127.0.0.1, 192.168.x.x, 80.y.y.y
Why not: "inet_interfaces = all"?
Wietse
> The latter addresses are virtual IPs which are loaded by pacemaker
> before Postfix gets started.
>
> Sometimes I need to generate mail local
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 04:46:50PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > Does postfix have similar parameter for postqueue?
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#authorized_mailq_users
>
> > Also, why postfix set permission to postqueue to world-executable? Why
> > not restrict in to root o
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:18:39PM +0700, Masegaloeh wrote:
> When migrating configuration from sendmail to postfix, I notice there
> are configuration like
>
> "PrivacyOptions=restrictmailq"
>
> This page[1] explains this parameter basically limit who can examine a
> queue's contents.
>
> Does
On 01/23/2015 08:43 AM, Roger Goh wrote:
Q3:
Was told by our vendor that they set up 'commercial' version of
sendmail which has a
separate interface/module GUI for whitelisting & blacklisting. Is
there a commercial
version of 'postfix' which we can get official (eg: supported by RHEL)
suppor
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 08:45:38PM +0800, Roger Goh wrote:
> Does Redhat support postfix (ie provide patches, troubleshooting of
> crashes, slowness)?
Postfix is not prone to crashes, but if for some unexpected reason
it does, or you're experiencing performance issues, you'll likely
get better su
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 20:45:38 +0800, Roger Goh stated:
> Q4:
> Does Redhat support postfix (ie provide patches, troubleshooting of
> crashes, slowness)?
>
> Q5:
> We are on SendMail version 3.3.4 & I think it's a commercially-added
> tool Flow Control version 2.1.7.
> Are these versions rather out
Thanks Viktor.
Bear with me if this is OT.
Q4:
Does Redhat support postfix (ie provide patches, troubleshooting of
crashes, slowness)?
Q5:
We are on SendMail version 3.3.4 & I think it's a commercially-added
tool Flow Control version 2.1.7.
Are these versions rather outdated?
I won't comment on
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:43:39PM +0800, Roger Goh wrote:
> We are using a commercial version of sendmail (refer to sendmail.com)
> on RHEL 5.x
>
> We have seen something like 2 mails sent to it within 5 mins &
> it just hung up or caused severe delay in delivery.
Sendmail has no queue mana
bitozoid:
> When using sendmail binary, I have found two sources of errors.
> - No recipients.
> - Not authorized (user is not in 'authorized_submit_users').
>
> I have two questions:
>
> 1) Errors get logged, but is there a way for them to be reported by email?
Use a logfile monitor. Postfix lo
Timo Veith:
> 2012/6/28 Wietse Venema :
> > Timo Veith:
> >> that rejects messages in the smtp dialogue if the envelope recipient
> >> is unknown.
I answered that question, even though it was not about Postfix.
> I have not found a way to reject a message with
> a bad rcpt address based on invali
2012/6/28 Wietse Venema :
> Timo Veith:
>> I am searching for a similiar configuation parameter for sendmail,
>> that rejects messages in the smtp dialogue if the envelope recipient
>> is unknown.
>>
>> I've found Local_check_rcpt, check_rcpt check_compat, but these seem
>> not to be enough, is tha
Timo Veith:
> I am searching for a similiar configuation parameter for sendmail,
> that rejects messages in the smtp dialogue if the envelope recipient
> is unknown.
>
> I've found Local_check_rcpt, check_rcpt check_compat, but these seem
> not to be enough, is that correct?
Below is the first Go
Am 26.12.2009 15:20, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Hi @ll,
>> merry X-mas
>>
>> i have a webserver with some customers
>> using binary sendmail command deliver out mail to local postfix from the
>> www-data apache with i.e perl scripts, by ignorance of the customers the
>> often do
Robert Schetterer:
> Hi @ll,
> merry X-mas
>
> i have a webserver with some customers
> using binary sendmail command deliver out mail to local postfix from the
> www-data apache with i.e perl scripts, by ignorance of the customers the
> often dont debug their scripts ( in time )
> is there a setu
On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Chris Smith:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm hoping to obtain some confirmation on the data format the sendmail
> > interface expects, I am under the impression that as a NIX program it
> > will expect emails using LF for new lines as opposed to the SMTP
> >
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Chris Smith:
>> Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> The format should be consistent with RFC 5322 (RFC 2822, RFC 822)
>>> and with MIME if applicable. Text is expected to be in native UNIX
>>> stream-LF format.
>> Exactly what my thoughts were on the subject, how about folding of
>> he
Chris Smith:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The Postfix sendmail command expects a PRE-FORMATTED message. The
> > result of ill-formatted messages is undefined (gargabe in, garbage
> > out).
> >
> Yeah that's certainly what I would expect.
>
> > The format should be consistent with RFC 5322 (RFC 2822
Wietse Venema wrote:
> The Postfix sendmail command expects a PRE-FORMATTED message. The
> result of ill-formatted messages is undefined (gargabe in, garbage
> out).
>
Yeah that's certainly what I would expect.
> The format should be consistent with RFC 5322 (RFC 2822, RFC 822)
> and with MIME if
Chris Smith:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hoping to obtain some confirmation on the data format the sendmail
> interface expects, I am under the impression that as a NIX program it
> will expect emails using LF for new lines as opposed to the SMTP
> standard of CRLF. How does this apply to line folding? Does Pos
Chris Smith wrote:
Hi,
I'm hoping to obtain some confirmation on the data format the sendmail
interface expects, I am under the impression that as a NIX program it
will expect emails using LF for new lines as opposed to the SMTP
standard of CRLF. How does this apply to line folding? Does Postfix
joy mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello all.
> how we can create virtual domain`s in sendamil.
>
> any advice.
This is the *Postfix* mailing list. Ask your question on the Sendmail list.
If you are trolling, stop.
--
Sa
42 matches
Mail list logo
