Wietse Venema schrieb am 23.08.20 um 14:14:05 Uhr:
> > > >> with postfix version 2.11.11?
> > > >
> > > > You are running some Frankenstein Postfix, perhaps with features
> > > > backported by RHEL. Such backports are NOT part of the official
> > > > Postfix release, and are NOT SUPPORTED.
ratatouille:
> Peter schrieb am 23.08.20 um 16:10:19 Uhr:
>
> > On 23/08/20 2:16 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > >>
> > >> with postfix version 2.11.11?
> > >
> > > You are running some Frankenstein Postfix, perhaps with features
> > > backported by RHEL. Such backports are NOT part of the offici
On 23/08/20 8:18 pm, ratatouille wrote:
Peter schrieb am 23.08.20 um 16:10:19 Uhr:
On 23/08/20 2:16 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
with postfix version 2.11.11?
You are running some Frankenstein Postfix, perhaps with features
backported by RHEL. Such backports are NOT part of the official
Postfi
Peter schrieb am 23.08.20 um 16:10:19 Uhr:
> On 23/08/20 2:16 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>
> >> with postfix version 2.11.11?
> >
> > You are running some Frankenstein Postfix, perhaps with features
> > backported by RHEL. Such backports are NOT part of the official
> > Postfix release, and a
On 23/08/20 2:16 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
with postfix version 2.11.11?
You are running some Frankenstein Postfix, perhaps with features
backported by RHEL. Such backports are NOT part of the official
Postfix release, and are NOT SUPPORTED.
RHEL 7 has 2.10.1, RHEL 8 has 3.3.1. There is no r
Jaroslaw Rafa schrieb am 22.08.20 um 17:38:18 Uhr:
> Dnia 22.08.2020 o godz. 16:54:58 ratatouille pisze:
> >
> > What I don't understand at the moment is that when I send a mail
> > that contains german umlauts in the subjectline to the server in question,
> > it is delivered flawlessly.
> >
>
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:58:46 +0200
ratatouille wrote:
> Souji Thenria schrieb am 22.08.20 um 14:46:20 Uhr:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:34:36 +0200
> > ratatouille wrote:
>
> > > Any chance to circumvent a
> > >
> > > status=bounced (SMTPUTF8 is required, but was not offered by host
> > > s
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:34:36 +0200
ratatouille wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Any chance to circumvent a
>
> status=bounced (SMTPUTF8 is required, but was not offered by host
> smtp.bitclusive.de[92.60.38.182])
>
> with postfix version 2.11.11?
>
> I'm setting up an onlinestore and find this in the log
Dnia 22.08.2020 o godz. 16:54:58 ratatouille pisze:
>
> What I don't understand at the moment is that when I send a mail
> that contains german umlauts in the subjectline to the server in question,
> it is delivered flawlessly.
>
> Not so when the store (running on another server with mail_versio
ratatouille:
> > You are running some Frankenstein Postfix, perhaps with features
> > backported by RHEL. Such backports are NOT part of the official
> > Postfix release, and are NOT SUPPORTED.
>
> I'll migrate to a newer server when I find the time.
>
> What I don't understand at the moment is t
Wietse Venema schrieb am 22.08.20 um 10:16:36 Uhr:
> > Any chance to circumvent a
> >
> > status=bounced (SMTPUTF8 is required, but was not offered by host
> > smtp.bitclusive.de[92.60.38.182])
> >
> > with postfix version 2.11.11?
>
> Postfix 2.11 has no SMTPUTF8 support.
>
> % grep -ri s
ratatouille:
> Hello!
>
> Any chance to circumvent a
>
> status=bounced (SMTPUTF8 is required, but was not offered by host
> smtp.bitclusive.de[92.60.38.182])
>
> with postfix version 2.11.11?
Postfix 2.11 has no SMTPUTF8 support.
% grep -ri smtputf8 postfix-2.11.0 |wc -l
0
SMTPUTF8 s
ratatouille schrieb am 22.08.20 um 14:58:46 Uhr:
> Souji Thenria schrieb am 22.08.20 um 14:46:20 Uhr:
> > have you already looked into this?
> > http://www.postfix.org/SMTPUTF8_README.html
>
> Yes and I found it is not possible to set smtputf8_enable = yes with this
> postfix version.
I ch
Souji Thenria schrieb am 22.08.20 um 14:46:20 Uhr:
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:34:36 +0200
> ratatouille wrote:
> > Any chance to circumvent a
> >
> > status=bounced (SMTPUTF8 is required, but was not offered by host
> > smtp.bitclusive.de[92.60.38.182])
> >
> > with postfix version 2.11.11?
>
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:20:48 +0200, Patrick Proniewski stated:
>On 17 juin 2020, at 22:05, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:00:32PM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
>>
- disable SMTPUTF8 in Postfix.
>>>
>>> That means disabling it everywhere and let messages bou
On 17 juin 2020, at 22:05, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:00:32PM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
>
>>> - disable SMTPUTF8 in Postfix.
>>
>> That means disabling it everywhere and let messages bounce on MX servers.
>> Would not really change anything in the end.
>
> Ye
Hello,
> On 17 juin 2020, at 16:28, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Patrick Proniewski:
>> Jun 17 12:34:20 postfix-mailgw/smtp[77347]: 57F56EB256:
>> to=, orig_to=,
>> relay=Exchange-VIP[Exchange-VIP]:25, delay=0.01, delays=0.01/0/0/0,
>> dsn=5.6.7, status=bounced (SMTPUTF8 is required, but was not
Hello,
> On 17 juin 2020, at 22:48, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> On 17 Jun 2020, at 14:00, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
>> Not possible yet. A flag exists for Exchange 2019 but we are running 2016
>> now and upgrade is not scheduled for now.
>
> Perhaps showing the bouncing emails to whomever is in charge
On 17 Jun 2020, at 14:00, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
> Not possible yet. A flag exists for Exchange 2019 but we are running 2016 now
> and upgrade is not scheduled for now.
Perhaps showing the bouncing emails to whomever is in charge of this schedule
will change it, especially if any of the boun
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:00:32PM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
> > - disable SMTPUTF8 in Postfix.
>
> That means disabling it everywhere and let messages bounce on MX servers.
> Would not really change anything in the end.
Yes, but it is the right thing to do. Better than generating
backs
Hi,
> On 17 juin 2020, at 15:42, Bastian Blank
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:37:23PM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
>> For some time now I notice that some messages, either originating from
>> Internet or from internal servers are bounced when they arrive on the last
>> hop: Excha
Patrick Proniewski:
> Jun 17 12:34:20 postfix-mailgw/smtp[77347]: 57F56EB256:
> to=, orig_to=,
> relay=Exchange-VIP[Exchange-VIP]:25, delay=0.01, delays=0.01/0/0/0,
> dsn=5.6.7, status=bounced (SMTPUTF8 is required, but was not offered by host
> Exchange-VIP[Exchange-VIP])
>
It is required (i
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:37:23PM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
> For some time now I notice that some messages, either originating from
> Internet or from internal servers are bounced when they arrive on the last
> hop: Exchange.
> Jun 17 12:34:20 postfix-mailgw/smtp[77347]: 57F56EB256:
> t
Hi,
> On 17 juin 2020, at 15:08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 17.06.20 14:37, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
>> I have at work a Postfix infrastructure that sits between Internet and our
>> Exchange servers. Postfix is used for MX and SMTP roles, ensure filtering
>> with Amavisd/Clamav/etc
On 17.06.20 14:37, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
I have at work a Postfix infrastructure that sits between Internet and our
Exchange servers. Postfix is used for MX and SMTP roles, ensure filtering with
Amavisd/Clamav/etc.
For some time now I notice that some messages, either originating from Inter
25 matches
Mail list logo
