Thanks Stan
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Jaques Cochet put forth on 1/17/2011 12:18 AM:
>> If postfix alone is running on the server, let's say as a mail router
>> or backend delivey system, would postfix processes make use of all
>> cores? would I be left with cores d
Jaques Cochet put forth on 1/17/2011 12:18 AM:
> If postfix alone is running on the server, let's say as a mail router
> or backend delivey system, would postfix processes make use of all
> cores? would I be left with cores doing nothing even If I have an
> important number of emails to process?
I
On 1/17/11 7:18 AM, Jaques Cochet wrote:
If postfix alone is running on the server, let's say as a mail router
or backend delivey system, would postfix processes make use of all
cores?
That's a loaded question, since "postfix" is not a process that consumes
CPU.
In one (1) postfix instance,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Jaques Cochet wrote:
> If postfix alone is running on the server, let's say as a mail router
> or backend delivey system, would postfix processes make use of all
> cores? would I be left with cores doing nothing even If I have an
> important number of emai
If postfix alone is running on the server, let's say as a mail router
or backend delivey system, would postfix processes make use of all
cores? would I be left with cores doing nothing even If I have an
important number of emails to process?
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 06:55:39AM +0200, Jaques Cochet wrote:
> Does increasing the number of cores on the same hardware platform add
> performance to a Postfix system or it is better to run several Postfix
> systems on different machines?
Yes, but only if the CPU is the bottleneck. Typically th
